Prince Harry and Meghan in Near Catastrophic Car Chase in NYC

[Anonymous]

Who was taking care of their children?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Who was taking care of their children?

The help.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Who was taking care of their children?

Same hired people who do every other day.

[Anonymous]

They seem very confused about what their rights are here. If they are in public, they may be photographed without their consent.

[Anonymous]

Why is Harry photographing the photographers? They aren't breaking any laws.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:DCUM's version of Mean Girls featuring bored government workers is in effect. I suspect the posters who don't like H&M are probably just jealous of her beauty, money and high pedigree husband. Y'all need to get back to your boring suburban sh!t shacks and cheating husbands.

Are you a troll or do you actually believe this? PPs are identifying facts that contradict M&H’s statement and your rebuttal is:

Y’all just jealous
Y’all have boring jobs
Y’all’s husbands are cheating on you
Y’all live in suburban shacks

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:DCUM's version of Mean Girls featuring bored government workers is in effect. I suspect the posters who don't like H&M are probably just jealous of her beauty, money and high pedigree husband. Y'all need to get back to your boring suburban sh!t shacks and cheating husbands.

It's not DCUM. Sorry. The TMZ article above your post is not at all on H&M's side. They are losing goodwill every second. Ouch.

They can't lose what they never had - the minute Harry announced that he was going to marry her the claws came out for her.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Sadly, the real reason his mother died was that her driver had a high blood alcohol level. He was driving while impaired and made some very bad decisions. If the driver of that car had not been drinking before getting behind the wheel, there very well may not have been a crash that night.

I'm rather fascinated with the evolution of this theory.

I watched the story unfold when the crash happened. The driver's family and friends emphatically stated he was NOT A DRINKER, NEVER DRANK, WOULDN'T HAVE BEEN DRUNK.

And yet, the official statements placed the blame on a dead man (who couldn't defend himself) for having a high alcohol level.

Veeerrryyy interesting, if you ask me. Diana was an inconvenient problem for the BRF.

This^. A man who friends and family swear didn’t drink was all of a sudden a drunk on the one night he was chauffeuring the former Prince of England. Not believable except for those individuals who want to believe a lie over the truth.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The Conrad Hotel is right next door. They could have easily gone out a back entrance of the Ziegfeld Ballroom and into the back entrance of the hotel and none of this would have happened.

Apparently they entered from a side door to avoid the paparazzi. They tried exiting a side or back door, but the paps waiting.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Conrad Hotel is right next door. They could have easily gone out a back entrance of the Ziegfeld Ballroom and into the back entrance of the hotel and none of this would have happened.

Apparently they entered from a side door to avoid the paparazzi. They tried exiting a side or back door, but the paps waiting.

So their security team sucks. Any 22 year political campaign advance guy could do better.

[Anonymous]

This headline has the prepositions wrong. It was surely H&M who were chasing the paparazzi.

These two are desperate for relevance and attention. They planted this story, obviously. A two hour high speed car chase in Manhattan is literally impossible.

Furthermore, they are FAR from the biggest stars in NYC (laughably far). And yet after living there for forty years I have never once heard any luminary, movie star, famous person complain of being chased in a car by the paparazzi—the whole point of NYC is that your fame is unremarkable (bc there are so many other famous people too) and they leave you alone.

This story is 100% fiction and they are pathetic.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't know if I believe it. I think it's another ploy for attention.

Yep. She is freaking out about how irrelevant she is and she desperately needs to remind everyone that she's Diana #2. Lol.

So irrelevant you are 24 pages deep in a thread about her. Stop, you are a stan. It's ok to admit that you love and adore her.

...you need help.

Like, if you actually believe the Grifters of Sussex are being hounded by paps in cars in a city where that's next to impossible, in the era of the Internet where dozens of passers-by and motorists would've confirmed it, in an era of surveillance where there are cameras EVERYWHERE (and paparazzi know that, and she's not worth the trouble), you need help.

This is not the Nineties. Very few celebrities today command the kind of glittering rock-star status Princess Diana had, and paparazzi don't chase people through the streets anymore precisely because of what happened to Princess Diana.

They attended some random event where I saw a Hertz sign. Hardly glamorous enough to chase for photos. She doesn't have the shine of a princess, and she knows it, and she's making up a sick lie because she wants people to believe she's a reincarnation of Diana or something. People like her need help.

Here is a perfect take in Meghan, the Wannabe queen of hearts of Wonderland!

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12098661/amp/MAUREEN-CALLAHANs-hand-account-Meghans-word-salad-appearance-New-York-award-gala.html?ito=smartnews

This article is hilarious! And Meghan went from 0-60 fast. She only just left the brf and she already needs to pull the Diana car chase antic to keep the public’s interest?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:While it’s shameful that they were hounded like this, the over the top dramatic language doesn’t do them any favors.

There were no accidents or injuries during this 2 hour debacle, so “near catastrophic” is a bit of a stretch.

Also, why let it go on for 2 hours? Seems the driver should have pulled over. This wasn’t a mob trying to kill them. It’s horribly invasive, but surely avoiding being photographed after appearing at a much-publicized public event isn’t worth anyone’s life. So stop the car. Surely someone had a phone and could call police?

+1 Exactly my thoughts when reading. Don't want to compromise your friend's house, then stay at a hotel. Pull over. Anything is better than endangering people's lives.

Nice victim blaming.

Yes, I can see that with the hotel. But, not with pulling over. It said the chase included driving on sidewalks. Prince Harry should have know it was highly dangerous given his mom’s death. Would your answer still be the same if a pedestrian was hurt or killed as a result?

If I truly wanted privacy however after a public event, I would stay at a hotel, since they are equipped at handling this.

You’ll never what you would do because you will never have the opportunity to make such a decision.

In the meantime the rest of us can give our opinions on people tearing around cities, driving dangerously, risking the lives of others because they don't want their photo taken. Their antics can't put the public at risk.

Hm. Did they risk others lives or did the paparazzi. Interesting how you blame them for others bad behavior. It was the paparazzi dodging inbetween traffic and in the sidewalk, yet you’re blaming H&M. Typical of shifting to blame from the guilty to the innocent.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:While it’s shameful that they were hounded like this, the over the top dramatic language doesn’t do them any favors.

There were no accidents or injuries during this 2 hour debacle, so “near catastrophic” is a bit of a stretch.

Also, why let it go on for 2 hours? Seems the driver should have pulled over. This wasn’t a mob trying to kill them. It’s horribly invasive, but surely avoiding being photographed after appearing at a much-publicized public event isn’t worth anyone’s life. So stop the car. Surely someone had a phone and could call police?

+1 Exactly my thoughts when reading. Don't want to compromise your friend's house, then stay at a hotel. Pull over. Anything is better than endangering people's lives.

Nice victim blaming.

Yes, I can see that with the hotel. But, not with pulling over. It said the chase included driving on sidewalks. Prince Harry should have know it was highly dangerous given his mom’s death. Would your answer still be the same if a pedestrian was hurt or killed as a result?

If I truly wanted privacy however after a public event, I would stay at a hotel, since they are equipped at handling this.

You’ll never what you would do because you will never have the opportunity to make such a decision.

In the meantime the rest of us can give our opinions on people tearing around cities, driving dangerously, risking the lives of others because they don't want their photo taken. Their antics can't put the public at risk.

Hm. Did they risk others lives or did the paparazzi. Interesting how you blame them for others bad behavior. It was the paparazzi dodging inbetween traffic and in the sidewalk, yet you’re blaming H&M. Typical of shifting to blame from the guilty to the innocent.

Did they stop and allow the pics or did they put up a chase? Hm?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:they're such attention whoring liars. Nothing about this is true. I really wish they would go away. Thought they wanted peace and quiet? Nope, clearly not.

It's not funny to make sarcastic comments about their near catastrophic experience.

When did this catastrophic event happen? It is not possible for this to have happened in NY as reported.

It wasn't catastrophic - it was NEAR catastrophic. A car accident almost happened on a week day in New York. Certainly newsworthy and unusual, such that it is being described as "near catastrophic." Seriously though, a catastrophic accident is defined as:


A catastrophic accident (also called a traumatic accident) is one that causes ‘catastrophic impairments’, as defined by the Statutory Accident Benefits Schedule of Ontario. Severe injuries such as to the brain or spinal cord, permanent disabilities, and other irreversible harm can be considered catastrophic.


There is no way that an accident of this level is happening in NYC where they were driving. You can't even drive fast enough. Meghan was trying to be incognito in her bright shiny yellow dress but the paps found her anyway. WAH! Meghan is nuts!!!

"Waaaha! It's our privacy tour!"