Prince Harry and Meghan in Near Catastrophic Car Chase in NYC

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:DCUM's version of Mean Girls featuring bored government workers is in effect. I suspect the posters who don't like H&M are probably just jealous of her beauty, money and high pedigree husband. Y'all need to get back to your boring suburban sh!t shacks and cheating husbands.

It's not DCUM. Sorry. The TMZ article above your post is not at all on H&M's side. They are losing goodwill every second. Ouch.

First South Park and now TMZ?! Early 2000s media is flipping on then left and right.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Who was taking care of their children?

Who takes care of your children when you go to work or on date night with your significant other?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Who was taking care of their children?

Same hired people who do every other day.

You mean like the people you hire to take care of your children?

[Anonymous]

Some extremists think their kids don’t even exist so good job caring about the children, pp.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Conrad Hotel is right next door. They could have easily gone out a back entrance of the Ziegfeld Ballroom and into the back entrance of the hotel and none of this would have happened.

Apparently they entered from a side door to avoid the paparazzi. They tried exiting a side or back door, but the paps waiting.

So their security team sucks. Any 22 year political campaign advance guy could do better.

Probably. But they didn’t. Ronald Reagan had security and he still ended up in GW hospital on the surgical table as the doctors pulled bullets out of his body. Former PM of Japan, Shinzo Abe, had security and now he is 6-feet under. Security isn’t infallible.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Sadly, the real reason his mother died was that her driver had a high blood alcohol level. He was driving while impaired and made some very bad decisions. If the driver of that car had not been drinking before getting behind the wheel, there very well may not have been a crash that night.

I'm rather fascinated with the evolution of this theory.

I watched the story unfold when the crash happened. The driver's family and friends emphatically stated he was NOT A DRINKER, NEVER DRANK, WOULDN'T HAVE BEEN DRUNK.

And yet, the official statements placed the blame on a dead man (who couldn't defend himself) for having a high alcohol level.

Veeerrryyy interesting, if you ask me. Diana was an inconvenient problem for the BRF.

This^. A man who friends and family swear didn’t drink was all of a sudden a drunk on the one night he was chauffeuring the former Prince of England. Not believable except for those individuals who want to believe a lie over the truth.

It’s more believable that someone would drive so recklessly when they’re a little tipsy than when they’re stone cold sober. It’s hard to believe a sober professional would take the kind of risks that were taken that night.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I heard from investigative journalist Leland Vittart that there really was no authentic catastrophic episode and that things are being pulled out of proportion:
https://www.instagram.com/reel/CsW27TcOGQs/?igshid=MmJiY2I4NDBkZg==

OF course it was. That's their MO for pretty much everything

But people are catching on! https://www.instagram.com/reel/CsW27TcOGQs/?igshid=MmJiY2I4NDBkZg==

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:While it’s shameful that they were hounded like this, the over the top dramatic language doesn’t do them any favors.

There were no accidents or injuries during this 2 hour debacle, so “near catastrophic” is a bit of a stretch.

Also, why let it go on for 2 hours? Seems the driver should have pulled over. This wasn’t a mob trying to kill them. It’s horribly invasive, but surely avoiding being photographed after appearing at a much-publicized public event isn’t worth anyone’s life. So stop the car. Surely someone had a phone and could call police?

+1 Exactly my thoughts when reading. Don't want to compromise your friend's house, then stay at a hotel. Pull over. Anything is better than endangering people's lives.

Nice victim blaming.

Yes, I can see that with the hotel. But, not with pulling over. It said the chase included driving on sidewalks. Prince Harry should have know it was highly dangerous given his mom’s death. Would your answer still be the same if a pedestrian was hurt or killed as a result?

If I truly wanted privacy however after a public event, I would stay at a hotel, since they are equipped at handling this.

You’ll never what you would do because you will never have the opportunity to make such a decision.

In the meantime the rest of us can give our opinions on people tearing around cities, driving dangerously, risking the lives of others because they don't want their photo taken. Their antics can't put the public at risk.

Hm. Did they risk others lives or did the paparazzi. Interesting how you blame them for others bad behavior. It was the paparazzi dodging inbetween traffic and in the sidewalk, yet you’re blaming H&M. Typical of shifting to blame from the guilty to the innocent.

Did they stop and allow the pics or did they put up a chase? Hm?

. Nitwit. It has been explained to you multiple times and yet you continue to ignore the obvious to frame your own narrative. The paps had plenty of pictures. The papas were following them to determine their location.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:While it’s shameful that they were hounded like this, the over the top dramatic language doesn’t do them any favors.

There were no accidents or injuries during this 2 hour debacle, so “near catastrophic” is a bit of a stretch.

Also, why let it go on for 2 hours? Seems the driver should have pulled over. This wasn’t a mob trying to kill them. It’s horribly invasive, but surely avoiding being photographed after appearing at a much-publicized public event isn’t worth anyone’s life. So stop the car. Surely someone had a phone and could call police?

+1 Exactly my thoughts when reading. Don't want to compromise your friend's house, then stay at a hotel. Pull over. Anything is better than endangering people's lives.

Nice victim blaming.

Yes, I can see that with the hotel. But, not with pulling over. It said the chase included driving on sidewalks. Prince Harry should have know it was highly dangerous given his mom’s death. Would your answer still be the same if a pedestrian was hurt or killed as a result?

If I truly wanted privacy however after a public event, I would stay at a hotel, since they are equipped at handling this.

You’ll never what you would do because you will never have the opportunity to make such a decision.

In the meantime the rest of us can give our opinions on people tearing around cities, driving dangerously, risking the lives of others because they don't want their photo taken. Their antics can't put the public at risk.

Hm. Did they risk others lives or did the paparazzi. Interesting how you blame them for others bad behavior. It was the paparazzi dodging inbetween traffic and in the sidewalk, yet you’re blaming H&M. Typical of shifting to blame from the guilty to the innocent.

Recollections may vary on that. Also, like I tell my kids, they can't chase you if you don't run. I'm still confused why, if their lodging was so close, didn't they just GO THERE directly?

[Anonymous]

Remember when Barack and Michelle Obama came to NYC and had dinner at Blue Stone Barns and…nothing happened? Or when the UN convenes? Or when any number of celebrities and movie stars who are 100000000 more famous than this sad paid are just walking down the street or seen at the theater or dining out at the same restaurants as normal people? No paps, no chases, no press releases. These two as such brazen transparent liars.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Who was taking care of their children?

Who takes care of your children when you go to work or on date night with your significant other?

Of course, hiring someone to watch a child when you are unavailable is normal. The suggestion here is that Harry and Meghan do not take care of their own children regularly. I'm not suggesting this alone is wrong or bad -- millions of people have fulltime help so they can work. I suspect Harry and Meghan have fulltime nannies who watch and take care of the children.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:While it’s shameful that they were hounded like this, the over the top dramatic language doesn’t do them any favors.

There were no accidents or injuries during this 2 hour debacle, so “near catastrophic” is a bit of a stretch.

Also, why let it go on for 2 hours? Seems the driver should have pulled over. This wasn’t a mob trying to kill them. It’s horribly invasive, but surely avoiding being photographed after appearing at a much-publicized public event isn’t worth anyone’s life. So stop the car. Surely someone had a phone and could call police?

+1 Exactly my thoughts when reading. Don't want to compromise your friend's house, then stay at a hotel. Pull over. Anything is better than endangering people's lives.

Nice victim blaming.

Yes, I can see that with the hotel. But, not with pulling over. It said the chase included driving on sidewalks. Prince Harry should have know it was highly dangerous given his mom’s death. Would your answer still be the same if a pedestrian was hurt or killed as a result?

If I truly wanted privacy however after a public event, I would stay at a hotel, since they are equipped at handling this.

You’ll never what you would do because you will never have the opportunity to make such a decision.

In the meantime the rest of us can give our opinions on people tearing around cities, driving dangerously, risking the lives of others because they don't want their photo taken. Their antics can't put the public at risk.

Hm. Did they risk others lives or did the paparazzi. Interesting how you blame them for others bad behavior. It was the paparazzi dodging inbetween traffic and in the sidewalk, yet you’re blaming H&M. Typical of shifting to blame from the guilty to the innocent.

Did they stop and allow the pics or did they put up a chase? Hm?

. Nitwit. It has been explained to you multiple times and yet you continue to ignore the obvious to frame your own narrative. The paps had plenty of pictures. The papas were following them to determine their location.

So? Its not a state secret. They created this situation.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Who was taking care of their children?

Who takes care of your children when you go to work or on date night with your significant other?

Of course, hiring someone to watch a child when you are unavailable is normal. The suggestion here is that Harry and Meghan do not take care of their own children regularly. I'm not suggesting this alone is wrong or bad -- millions of people have fulltime help so they can work. I suspect Harry and Meghan have fulltime nannies who watch and take care of the children.

Especially since, by his own admission, Harry requires an hour+ of meditation daily just to keep his sanity.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:While it’s shameful that they were hounded like this, the over the top dramatic language doesn’t do them any favors.

There were no accidents or injuries during this 2 hour debacle, so “near catastrophic” is a bit of a stretch.

Also, why let it go on for 2 hours? Seems the driver should have pulled over. This wasn’t a mob trying to kill them. It’s horribly invasive, but surely avoiding being photographed after appearing at a much-publicized public event isn’t worth anyone’s life. So stop the car. Surely someone had a phone and could call police?

+1 Exactly my thoughts when reading. Don't want to compromise your friend's house, then stay at a hotel. Pull over. Anything is better than endangering people's lives.

Nice victim blaming.

Yes, I can see that with the hotel. But, not with pulling over. It said the chase included driving on sidewalks. Prince Harry should have know it was highly dangerous given his mom’s death. Would your answer still be the same if a pedestrian was hurt or killed as a result?

If I truly wanted privacy however after a public event, I would stay at a hotel, since they are equipped at handling this.

You’ll never what you would do because you will never have the opportunity to make such a decision.

In the meantime the rest of us can give our opinions on people tearing around cities, driving dangerously, risking the lives of others because they don't want their photo taken. Their antics can't put the public at risk.

Hm. Did they risk others lives or did the paparazzi. Interesting how you blame them for others bad behavior. It was the paparazzi dodging inbetween traffic and in the sidewalk, yet you’re blaming H&M. Typical of shifting to blame from the guilty to the innocent.

Recollections may vary on that. Also, like I tell my kids, they can't chase you if you don't run. I'm still confused why, if their lodging was so close, didn't they just GO THERE directly?

Maybe they don't want the public to know who was lodging them while in NYC.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:While it’s shameful that they were hounded like this, the over the top dramatic language doesn’t do them any favors.

There were no accidents or injuries during this 2 hour debacle, so “near catastrophic” is a bit of a stretch.

Also, why let it go on for 2 hours? Seems the driver should have pulled over. This wasn’t a mob trying to kill them. It’s horribly invasive, but surely avoiding being photographed after appearing at a much-publicized public event isn’t worth anyone’s life. So stop the car. Surely someone had a phone and could call police?

+1 Exactly my thoughts when reading. Don't want to compromise your friend's house, then stay at a hotel. Pull over. Anything is better than endangering people's lives.

Nice victim blaming.

Yes, I can see that with the hotel. But, not with pulling over. It said the chase included driving on sidewalks. Prince Harry should have know it was highly dangerous given his mom’s death. Would your answer still be the same if a pedestrian was hurt or killed as a result?

If I truly wanted privacy however after a public event, I would stay at a hotel, since they are equipped at handling this.

You’ll never what you would do because you will never have the opportunity to make such a decision.

In the meantime the rest of us can give our opinions on people tearing around cities, driving dangerously, risking the lives of others because they don't want their photo taken. Their antics can't put the public at risk.

Hm. Did they risk others lives or did the paparazzi. Interesting how you blame them for others bad behavior. It was the paparazzi dodging inbetween traffic and in the sidewalk, yet you’re blaming H&M. Typical of shifting to blame from the guilty to the innocent.

Did they stop and allow the pics or did they put up a chase? Hm?

. Nitwit. It has been explained to you multiple times and yet you continue to ignore the obvious to frame your own narrative. The paps had plenty of pictures. The papas were following them to determine their location.

So? Its not a state secret. They created this situation.

Exactly. Their top notch security team couldn't figure out how this might play out? They really thought they could move in secrecy in NYC?