| 
 So you think there’s a personnel record of a sexual assault in his personal papers that he wasn’t even required to keep, that he voluntarily gave to a university archive? Are you daft? | 
| 
 We don’t know do we? Why is he blocking it if there’s nothing to hide? | 
| 
 No one said online for everyone to see. | 
| 
 Alright, I'll send someone to your house to go through everything for me. I promise they will be impartial. I would let you pick the investigator, but you are a potential rapist so we can't trust you. | 
| As long as you havent been colluding or taking mob money or and with the broad assumpiton that you are not trying to further your own interests bring it on. | 
| 
 So you are daft. He’s “blocking” it because no one ever releases papers like that while they’re still in public life. That archive is probably full of classified stuff since he was VP. | 
| And in November you will be flattened. | 
| 
 This is 'but her emails" 2.0 He is blocking it because 1) there is ZERO chance the document in question exists in his personal papers and 2) what is in is his personal papers are his notes about policy, about world leaders about other Senators that he doesn't want made public until he is not in public life anymore, and further, he rightfully doesn't want right wing zealots to take fragments of documents out of context and politicize them during the election season. If you are so interested in politicians having more candor, then ask Trump for his taxes, and for a court ordered DNA samples on a sexual assault proceeding. | 
| 
 +1 Going on Fox should have nothing to do with any threats she might be receiving. She pulled out because her story fell apart and Chris Wallace would be smart enough to poke the holes that exist for Trump world to see firsthand. | 
| 
 Maybe, maybe not. I have no faith in our democracy anyway. Not when the outcome depends on convincing Neonazis in Michigan that the President ought not tell people to drink bleach. | 
| Now Katie Halper is deleting her tweets. Credibility blown. | 
| 
 Just like you insist on Trump tax returns, even though there’s no law requiring them. I’m just using your logic, there must be "something to hide" | 
| Eh, we have one old rapey smarter geezer taking on an old rapey stupid corrupt geezer who is currently president. I voting for the smart rapey one, who will probably only serve one term anyhow and won't be as corrupt. If the republican party of "conservative and family values" can vote in a corrupt rapist as president.... |