Whistleblower accuses Biden of criminal conduct

[Anonymous]

oh hey, another exoneration after the GOP smear campaign

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Meanwhile this Friday the first IRS whistleblower will testify behind closed doors on Capitol Hill. This right after another senior IRS investigator came forward just yesterday.

So?

They should both be locked in a dank cell somewhere and never heard from again. They’re not whistle blowers they’re politically motivated troublemakers. No credibility at all. They should go to prison for life.

It seems some whistleblowers aren't as "equal" as other whistleblowers.
What might be the difference? Hmmmm........

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Meanwhile this Friday the first IRS whistleblower will testify behind closed doors on Capitol Hill. This right after another senior IRS investigator came forward just yesterday.

So?

They should both be locked in a dank cell somewhere and never heard from again. They’re not whistle blowers they’re politically motivated troublemakers. No credibility at all. They should go to prison for life.

It seems some whistleblowers aren't as "equal" as other whistleblowers.
What might be the difference? Hmmmm........

These guys were paid shills who were sympathetic to a coup attempt on our country.

That *might* be the difference.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:oh hey, another exoneration after the GOP smear campaign

Conservative. I agree with this decision. There’s a difference between deliberately working with the Chinese and being led around by your gonads.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Meanwhile this Friday the first IRS whistleblower will testify behind closed doors on Capitol Hill. This right after another senior IRS investigator came forward just yesterday.

So?

They should both be locked in a dank cell somewhere and never heard from again. They’re not whistle blowers they’re politically motivated troublemakers. No credibility at all. They should go to prison for life.

It seems some whistleblowers aren't as "equal" as other whistleblowers.
What might be the difference? Hmmmm........

These guys were paid shills who were sympathetic to a coup attempt on our country.

That *might* be the difference.

I think you are getting your whistleblowers confused......the IRS whistleblowers have not yet testified.

p.s. None of them were paid shills.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:oh hey, another exoneration after the GOP smear campaign

Conservative. I agree with this decision. There’s a difference between deliberately working with the Chinese and being led around by your gonads.

The statement he put out is pretty funny considering he was one who said he had "strong evidence" of "clear" Russian collusion.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Meanwhile this Friday the first IRS whistleblower will testify behind closed doors on Capitol Hill. This right after another senior IRS investigator came forward just yesterday.

So?

They should both be locked in a dank cell somewhere and never heard from again. They’re not whistle blowers they’re politically motivated troublemakers. No credibility at all. They should go to prison for life.

It seems some whistleblowers aren't as "equal" as other whistleblowers.
What might be the difference? Hmmmm........

These guys were paid shills who were sympathetic to a coup attempt on our country.

That *might* be the difference.

Neither of these two have been identified. Nice try.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:oh hey, another exoneration after the GOP smear campaign

Conservative. I agree with this decision. There’s a difference between deliberately working with the Chinese and being led around by your gonads.

The statement he put out is pretty funny considering he was one who said he had "strong evidence" of "clear" Russian collusion.

No doubt he lies. Liars are easily fooled by others’ lies

[Anonymous]

Now the FBI director is talking...

[Anonymous]

[Anonymous]

If the FBI director is refusing to provide this because of a pending indictment against the president's son, good. But I'm not holding my breath, especially with Garlands lie under oath and alleged interference, which prompted one whistleblower to come forward.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:If the FBI director is refusing to provide this because of a pending indictment against the president's son, good. But I'm not holding my breath, especially with Garlands lie under oath and alleged interference, which prompted one whistleblower to come forward.

Lol. See you are still smoking that crack!

[Anonymous]

Speaking of smoking crack... which is worse - Manafort going to jail for FARA or Hunter not going to jail for the same crime?

[Anonymous]

Maybe the so called Biden crime syndicate should start floating a pardons selling scheme?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Speaking of smoking crack... which is worse - Manafort going to jail for FARA or Hunter not going to jail for the same crime?

Step one: prove there is a crime.

You have to at least complete step one. Wake us up when that has happened.