Valor

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Hoping in without reading the past couple post the op was talking about huh. Great work, clearly talking about the girls side. Please stay in your lane

Are you suggesting that Valor girls frequently move up to ECNL teams? LOL! Valor coaching sucks on both sides.

What I don't understand, with charging way above market rates for all of their rec/revenue teams...why doesn't Valor hire better coaches? Do the people in charge not know what a good coach looks like? Are they cheaping out on coach pay such that they can only get inexperienced coaches or parents? Because that is who they hire. It really doesn't make sense.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Hoping in without reading the past couple post the op was talking about huh. Great work, clearly talking about the girls side. Please stay in your lane

Are you suggesting that Valor girls frequently move up to ECNL teams? LOL! Valor coaching sucks on both sides.

What I don't understand, with charging way above market rates for all of their rec/revenue teams...why doesn't Valor hire better coaches? Do the people in charge not know what a good coach looks like? Are they cheaping out on coach pay such that they can only get inexperienced coaches or parents? Because that is who they hire. It really doesn't make sense.

I think part of the issue is management from the top. There seems to be very few standards and consistency pushed down. It feels more like coaches are able to go rogue other than adhering to the 5 tourneys assigned each year. Practices and technical development vary completely and there is very little standardization. This creates a number of issues that parents may not understand unless they go elsewhere. Once you do go elsewhere, you start to see what a more professionally run club looks like. Valor’s growing pains from 2021 are now in the past. There should be some club identity, but there isnt.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Hoping in without reading the past couple post the op was talking about huh. Great work, clearly talking about the girls side. Please stay in your lane

Are you suggesting that Valor girls frequently move up to ECNL teams? LOL! Valor coaching sucks on both sides.

What I don't understand, with charging way above market rates for all of their rec/revenue teams...why doesn't Valor hire better coaches? Do the people in charge not know what a good coach looks like? Are they cheaping out on coach pay such that they can only get inexperienced coaches or parents? Because that is who they hire. It really doesn't make sense.

I think part of the issue is management from the top. There seems to be very few standards and consistency pushed down. It feels more like coaches are able to go rogue other than adhering to the 5 tourneys assigned each year. Practices and technical development vary completely and there is very little standardization. This creates a number of issues that parents may not understand unless they go elsewhere. Once you do go elsewhere, you start to see what a more professionally run club looks like. Valor’s growing pains from 2021 are now in the past. There should be some club identity, but there isnt.

Do you mean coaches can decide to do less than 5, or more than 5, or just different ones than "assigned".

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Hoping in without reading the past couple post the op was talking about huh. Great work, clearly talking about the girls side. Please stay in your lane

Are you suggesting that Valor girls frequently move up to ECNL teams? LOL! Valor coaching sucks on both sides.

What I don't understand, with charging way above market rates for all of their rec/revenue teams...why doesn't Valor hire better coaches? Do the people in charge not know what a good coach looks like? Are they cheaping out on coach pay such that they can only get inexperienced coaches or parents? Because that is who they hire. It really doesn't make sense.

yes, compared to other local low-level clubs, Valor has a ton of admin staff and managerial types sucking up profit that should be going to pay for good coaches. the club was founded specifically so the dudes in charge could pay themselves more than they could get away with under the umbrella of a traditional rec sports league (CYA).

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Hoping in without reading the past couple post the op was talking about huh. Great work, clearly talking about the girls side. Please stay in your lane

Are you suggesting that Valor girls frequently move up to ECNL teams? LOL! Valor coaching sucks on both sides.

What I don't understand, with charging way above market rates for all of their rec/revenue teams...why doesn't Valor hire better coaches? Do the people in charge not know what a good coach looks like? Are they cheaping out on coach pay such that they can only get inexperienced coaches or parents? Because that is who they hire. It really doesn't make sense.

I think part of the issue is management from the top. There seems to be very few standards and consistency pushed down. It feels more like coaches are able to go rogue other than adhering to the 5 tourneys assigned each year. Practices and technical development vary completely and there is very little standardization. This creates a number of issues that parents may not understand unless they go elsewhere. Once you do go elsewhere, you start to see what a more professionally run club looks like. Valor’s growing pains from 2021 are now in the past. There should be some club identity, but there isnt.

Do you mean coaches can decide to do less than 5, or more than 5, or just different ones than "assigned".

other than the tourneys that are assigned, they pretty much have free reign on everything else