Wuhan virus (coronavirus) arrives in the USA

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:New cases in South Kate’s, Japan and Thailand as well. When are we going to get updated numbers from China?

China appears to be releasing the number of deaths and new cases of the previous day every morning their time, which is the evening of the day before our time.

Yesterday evening we learned that 15 more people died on Saturday--the announcement was Sunday morning China time. We can expect a new update tonight our time.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Here is the SARS fatality list from the WHO. Anyone notice something? Something statistically interesting?

https://www.who.int/csr/sars/country/country2003_08_15.pdf?ua=1

Cases--Deaths--Fatality rate
TWN — 665 — 180 — 27%
HKG — 1775 — 299 — 16%
CHINA — 5327 — 349 — 6.6%
CAN — 251 — 44 — 17%
SGP — 238 — 33 — 13%

Amazing how one country did so much better treating and saving patients than the others.

No ones argues that police states aren’t efficient.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Here is the SARS fatality list from the WHO. Anyone notice something? Something statistically interesting?

https://www.who.int/csr/sars/country/country2003_08_15.pdf?ua=1

Cases--Deaths--Fatality rate
TWN — 665 — 180 — 27%
HKG — 1775 — 299 — 16%
CHINA — 5327 — 349 — 6.6%
CAN — 251 — 44 — 17%
SGP — 238 — 33 — 13%

Amazing how one country did so much better treating and saving patients than the others.

Who would trust China to be truthful about this, seriously? Cheating, stealing and lying is part of the culture.

I think we should stop flights from China.

Do we stop importing food? Over 50 percent of apple juice comes from China apples. Check this article. It’s older so the imports are prob a lot higher now. https://americanmanufacturing.org/blog/entry/the-u.s.-imports-a-lot-of-food-from-china-and-you-might-be-surprised-whats

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The speed with which China is building a new hospital is amazing. Having a command economy coupled with terrific transparency is serving as a model for the world in terms of how to handle this health matter.

ROTFL

i do my best.

DP. WaPo article this morning said that they are using excavators to tear up roads leading into the quarantine zone to keep people from going in there to care for relatives. Plus these 1,000 bed popup hospitals. It amazes me to see this cultural difference with the U.S.

The level of efficiency is really something.

That's an authoritarian regime for you. They're also really efficient at hiding and covering up things.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Here is the SARS fatality list from the WHO. Anyone notice something? Something statistically interesting?

https://www.who.int/csr/sars/country/country2003_08_15.pdf?ua=1

Cases--Deaths--Fatality rate
TWN — 665 — 180 — 27%
HKG — 1775 — 299 — 16%
CHINA — 5327 — 349 — 6.6%
CAN — 251 — 44 — 17%
SGP — 238 — 33 — 13%

Amazing how one country did so much better treating and saving patients than the others.

Is it the one responsible for the virus notorious for a lack of public health transparency who underreported it to save face?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The speed with which China is building a new hospital is amazing. Having a command economy coupled with terrific transparency is serving as a model for the world in terms of how to handle this health matter.

ROTFL

i do my best.

DP. WaPo article this morning said that they are using excavators to tear up roads leading into the quarantine zone to keep people from going in there to care for relatives. Plus these 1,000 bed popup hospitals. It amazes me to see this cultural difference with the U.S.

The level of efficiency is really something.

That's an authoritarian regime for you. They're also really efficient at hiding and covering up things.

The optics concern Dear Leader.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I can’t believe they’re allowing travel from China.

It's a very very large country.

I agree.

If I was at a city in China with no travel ban, I would take the whole family out for a 2-3 week vacation in the US or Europe.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I can’t believe they’re allowing travel from China.

It's a very very large country.

I agree.

If I was at a city in China with no travel ban, I would take the whole family out for a 2-3 week vacation in the US or Europe.

It spreads before symptoms show. That’s why it’s hard to identify. See the bbc article posted today. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/amp/world-asia-china-51254523?__twitter_impression=true

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I can’t believe they’re allowing travel from China.

It's a very very large country.

I agree.

If I was at a city in China with no travel ban, I would take the whole family out for a 2-3 week vacation in the US or Europe.

They've known about this since December. Many have.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Here is the SARS fatality list from the WHO. Anyone notice something? Something statistically interesting?

https://www.who.int/csr/sars/country/country2003_08_15.pdf?ua=1

Cases--Deaths--Fatality rate
TWN — 665 — 180 — 27%
HKG — 1775 — 299 — 16%
CHINA — 5327 — 349 — 6.6%
CAN — 251 — 44 — 17%
SGP — 238 — 33 — 13%

Amazing how one country did so much better treating and saving patients than the others.

Is it the one responsible for the virus notorious for a lack of public health transparency who underreported it to save face?

Ask the microbiologist who says we have good statistics from China.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Here is the SARS fatality list from the WHO. Anyone notice something? Something statistically interesting?

https://www.who.int/csr/sars/country/country2003_08_15.pdf?ua=1

Cases--Deaths--Fatality rate
TWN — 665 — 180 — 27%
HKG — 1775 — 299 — 16%
CHINA — 5327 — 349 — 6.6%
CAN — 251 — 44 — 17%
SGP — 238 — 33 — 13%

Amazing how one country did so much better treating and saving patients than the others.

Is it the one responsible for the virus notorious for a lack of public health transparency who underreported it to save face?

Ask the microbiologist who says we have good statistics from China.

And Art Vanderlay about their quick build hospital.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Here is the SARS fatality list from the WHO. Anyone notice something? Something statistically interesting?

https://www.who.int/csr/sars/country/country2003_08_15.pdf?ua=1

Cases--Deaths--Fatality rate
TWN — 665 — 180 — 27%
HKG — 1775 — 299 — 16%
CHINA — 5327 — 349 — 6.6%
CAN — 251 — 44 — 17%
SGP — 238 — 33 — 13%

Amazing how one country did so much better treating and saving patients than the others.

Is it the one responsible for the virus notorious for a lack of public health transparency who underreported it to save face?

Ask the microbiologist who says we have good statistics from China.

The microbiologist expressed the view that the statistics coming out of China on the Wuhan virus were good.

She said nothing about the SARS statistics from China, which pretty much everyone agrees were deeply suspect.

China does seem to have learned from SARS that lying about an epidemic can have lasting adverse effects on one's international reputation. Hence, the tendency to think the Wuhan numbers are much more accurate.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Here is the SARS fatality list from the WHO. Anyone notice something? Something statistically interesting?

https://www.who.int/csr/sars/country/country2003_08_15.pdf?ua=1

Cases--Deaths--Fatality rate
TWN — 665 — 180 — 27%
HKG — 1775 — 299 — 16%
CHINA — 5327 — 349 — 6.6%
CAN — 251 — 44 — 17%
SGP — 238 — 33 — 13%

Amazing how one country did so much better treating and saving patients than the others.

Is it the one responsible for the virus notorious for a lack of public health transparency who underreported it to save face?

Really?

Ask the microbiologist who says we have good statistics from China.

The microbiologist expressed the view that the statistics coming out of China on the Wuhan virus were good.

She said nothing about the SARS statistics from China, which pretty much everyone agrees were deeply suspect.

China does seem to have learned from SARS that lying about an epidemic can have lasting adverse effects on one's international reputation. Hence, the tendency to think the Wuhan numbers are much more accurate.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Here is the SARS fatality list from the WHO. Anyone notice something? Something statistically interesting?

https://www.who.int/csr/sars/country/country2003_08_15.pdf?ua=1

Cases--Deaths--Fatality rate
TWN — 665 — 180 — 27%
HKG — 1775 — 299 — 16%
CHINA — 5327 — 349 — 6.6%
CAN — 251 — 44 — 17%
SGP — 238 — 33 — 13%

Amazing how one country did so much better treating and saving patients than the others.

Is it the one responsible for the virus notorious for a lack of public health transparency who underreported it to save face?

Ask the microbiologist who says we have good statistics from China.

And Art Vanderlay about their quick build hospital.

Is that a titleist?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Here is the SARS fatality list from the WHO. Anyone notice something? Something statistically interesting?

https://www.who.int/csr/sars/country/country2003_08_15.pdf?ua=1

Cases--Deaths--Fatality rate
TWN — 665 — 180 — 27%
HKG — 1775 — 299 — 16%
CHINA — 5327 — 349 — 6.6%
CAN — 251 — 44 — 17%
SGP — 238 — 33 — 13%

Amazing how one country did so much better treating and saving patients than the others.

Is it the one responsible for the virus notorious for a lack of public health transparency who underreported it to save face?

Really?

Ask the microbiologist who says we have good statistics from China.

The microbiologist expressed the view that the statistics coming out of China on the Wuhan virus were good.

She said nothing about the SARS statistics from China, which pretty much everyone agrees were deeply suspect.

China does seem to have learned from SARS that lying about an epidemic can have lasting adverse effects on one's international reputation. Hence, the tendency to think the Wuhan numbers are much more accurate.

Lol