The Trump women and their fashion mishaps thread

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I missed this when it happened a couple weeks ago.

Ivanka posted for her sister (Tiffany's) birthday. So, interesting (is that the word?) she chose this particular pic.

I think it’s fabulous and artistic.

I agree with you but not for the reasons I'm sure you're thinking.

The composition highlights the difference and disconnect between the two figures. At a quick glance, this is what I see:

The women is mature and in a fancy, black dress - the traditional color of mourning or seduction. The child is young,nearly naked and depicted in a style associated with innocence and love.
There appears to be no relationship between the woman and child. It's as if the child were photoshopped into it. There's no warmth, no connection between the two.
The woman is leaning one way, the child another. Again, this emphasizes their distance and lack of relationship
Even the woman's hand on the child's thigh, with it's splayed straight fingers, indicates no possession or care of the child. There is nothing keeping the child from sliding off the couch - the child isn't even sitting on her lap.
The coloring and position of the child indicates she's part of the furniture/decor. She blends into the background. She's an afterthought, a prop. The focus is on the main figure in black.
The child is sucking on a bottle from which no milk could flow with a vacant, distant look in her eyes. She is alone an isolated even though she is surrounded by a woman.

For me, the photo epitomizes the selfishness of Ivanka and how the Trump family treats Tiffany. So, yes, it is fabulous and artistic.

Well done.

Who holds a baby, not on a lap? That jumped out immediately.

[Anonymous]

Caption: Don’t let your teens babysit their baby half-sibling after ugly divorce with their mom.

I do think Ivanka looks beautiful in that photo but it is the weirdest sibling photo I’ve ever seen and so weirdly narcissistic that she’d post it on her sister’s birthday. Does she not have a cute one of Tiffany where she looks happy to be with her? This one says “I am in tragically elegant mourning over my life, and this baby deepens my sadness, as I am meant for greater and more beautiful things than this, my life.” Or something like that. She looks like she stepped off a film noire set. This must have been for some kind of modeling shoot, no? Plus, don’t we all just hate the friend or sister that posts a fabulous shot of themselves, where they look gorgeous, and you are kind of staring off into space with a double chin?

[Anonymous]

Why isn't the baby wearing any clothes in that picture to protect her skin from the beading, tulle, crow feathers, and whatever else Ivanka's dress is made out of?

[Anonymous]

Why don't her clothes fit?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I missed this when it happened a couple weeks ago.

Ivanka posted for her sister (Tiffany's) birthday. So, interesting (is that the word?) she chose this particular pic.

I think it’s fabulous and artistic.

I agree with you but not for the reasons I'm sure you're thinking.

The composition highlights the difference and disconnect between the two figures. At a quick glance, this is what I see:

The women is mature and in a fancy, black dress - the traditional color of mourning or seduction. The child is young,nearly naked and depicted in a style associated with innocence and love.
There appears to be no relationship between the woman and child. It's as if the child were photoshopped into it. There's no warmth, no connection between the two.
The woman is leaning one way, the child another. Again, this emphasizes their distance and lack of relationship
Even the woman's hand on the child's thigh, with it's splayed straight fingers, indicates no possession or care of the child. There is nothing keeping the child from sliding off the couch - the child isn't even sitting on her lap.
The coloring and position of the child indicates she's part of the furniture/decor. She blends into the background. She's an afterthought, a prop. The focus is on the main figure in black.
The child is sucking on a bottle from which no milk could flow with a vacant, distant look in her eyes. She is alone an isolated even though she is surrounded by a woman.

For me, the photo epitomizes the selfishness of Ivanka and how the Trump family treats Tiffany. So, yes, it is fabulous and artistic.

Well done.

Who holds a baby, not on a lap? That jumped out immediately.

Is this Ivanka's original face?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I missed this when it happened a couple weeks ago.

Ivanka posted for her sister (Tiffany's) birthday. So, interesting (is that the word?) she chose this particular pic.

I think it’s fabulous and artistic.

I agree with you but not for the reasons I'm sure you're thinking.

The composition highlights the difference and disconnect between the two figures. At a quick glance, this is what I see:

The women is mature and in a fancy, black dress - the traditional color of mourning or seduction. The child is young,nearly naked and depicted in a style associated with innocence and love.
There appears to be no relationship between the woman and child. It's as if the child were photoshopped into it. There's no warmth, no connection between the two.
The woman is leaning one way, the child another. Again, this emphasizes their distance and lack of relationship
Even the woman's hand on the child's thigh, with it's splayed straight fingers, indicates no possession or care of the child. There is nothing keeping the child from sliding off the couch - the child isn't even sitting on her lap.
The coloring and position of the child indicates she's part of the furniture/decor. She blends into the background. She's an afterthought, a prop. The focus is on the main figure in black.
The child is sucking on a bottle from which no milk could flow with a vacant, distant look in her eyes. She is alone an isolated even though she is surrounded by a woman.

For me, the photo epitomizes the selfishness of Ivanka and how the Trump family treats Tiffany. So, yes, it is fabulous and artistic.

Well done.

Who holds a baby, not on a lap? That jumped out immediately.

Is this Ivanka's original face?

No. This is after she tried teen modeling with her father’s friend, human trafficker John Casablancas, and she had her first nose job somewhere around there. This is fairly close to the face she had on that picture in which she appears to be dancing on her father’s lap (https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/ivanka-trump-lap-sitting/).

But the expensive widow’s weeds picture is much closer to her original face, so much so that I didn’t know who it was!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Why don't her clothes fit?

This version of her face is very Hillary.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I missed this when it happened a couple weeks ago.

Ivanka posted for her sister (Tiffany's) birthday. So, interesting (is that the word?) she chose this particular pic.

I think it’s fabulous and artistic.

I agree with you but not for the reasons I'm sure you're thinking.

The composition highlights the difference and disconnect between the two figures. At a quick glance, this is what I see:

The women is mature and in a fancy, black dress - the traditional color of mourning or seduction. The child is young,nearly naked and depicted in a style associated with innocence and love.
There appears to be no relationship between the woman and child. It's as if the child were photoshopped into it. There's no warmth, no connection between the two.
The woman is leaning one way, the child another. Again, this emphasizes their distance and lack of relationship
Even the woman's hand on the child's thigh, with it's splayed straight fingers, indicates no possession or care of the child. There is nothing keeping the child from sliding off the couch - the child isn't even sitting on her lap.
The coloring and position of the child indicates she's part of the furniture/decor. She blends into the background. She's an afterthought, a prop. The focus is on the main figure in black.
The child is sucking on a bottle from which no milk could flow with a vacant, distant look in her eyes. She is alone an isolated even though she is surrounded by a woman.

For me, the photo epitomizes the selfishness of Ivanka and how the Trump family treats Tiffany. So, yes, it is fabulous and artistic.

Ivanka here reminds me of the girl in the movie "Betelgeuse". I think actually it shows a realistic sister relationship when one of the sisters is a teenager. Teenagers are a bit drama queens, and like to keep their siblings in their place. But I actually feel affection there, of a teenage sort. She is, after all, allowing her definitely uncool sister in diapers to hang with her.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why don't her clothes fit?

This version of her face is very Hillary.

Totally agree! I had to look closer to be sure it wasn't a young Hillary.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The makeup is so odd. She used to do this well ... why not now?

She looks like Hillary Clinton in this picture.

LOL yes, minus the heels!

whoaa

OMG!! Wow. Spot on.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I missed this when it happened a couple weeks ago.

Ivanka posted for her sister (Tiffany's) birthday. So, interesting (is that the word?) she chose this particular pic.

I think it’s fabulous and artistic.

I agree with you but not for the reasons I'm sure you're thinking.

The composition highlights the difference and disconnect between the two figures. At a quick glance, this is what I see:

The women is mature and in a fancy, black dress - the traditional color of mourning or seduction. The child is young,nearly naked and depicted in a style associated with innocence and love.
There appears to be no relationship between the woman and child. It's as if the child were photoshopped into it. There's no warmth, no connection between the two.
The woman is leaning one way, the child another. Again, this emphasizes their distance and lack of relationship
Even the woman's hand on the child's thigh, with it's splayed straight fingers, indicates no possession or care of the child. There is nothing keeping the child from sliding off the couch - the child isn't even sitting on her lap.
The coloring and position of the child indicates she's part of the furniture/decor. She blends into the background. She's an afterthought, a prop. The focus is on the main figure in black.
The child is sucking on a bottle from which no milk could flow with a vacant, distant look in her eyes. She is alone an isolated even though she is surrounded by a woman.

For me, the photo epitomizes the selfishness of Ivanka and how the Trump family treats Tiffany. So, yes, it is fabulous and artistic.

Your analysis is excellent. I would like to add that both Ivanka and Tiffany are presented as objects. Ivanka is arranged in half sleep and half naked. Her breasts are partially exposed. The viewer is invited to rouse or touch her or invade her space. The baby's legs are open and of course she is undressed.

This is not a snapshot. It is a posed and carefully produced photo. Everything is deliberate.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why don't her clothes fit?

If the ridiculous size was deliberate, you'd think it would be ironed. Yikes, this is so very bad.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why don't her clothes fit?

This version of her face is very Hillary.

Totally agree! I had to look closer to be sure it wasn't a young Hillary.

She should sit out the puffy headband trend to avoid the comparison. She should sit out the oversized coat trend given the boobs. She won't. If she wore a heel hight suitable for keeping up with kids, the candid shots might come back less forlorn.

[Anonymous]

I love this coat. (Second to Pelosi’s coat. Love Max Mara!) I would only have the hem on this let out though.

[Anonymous]

I think she got too much filler.