The Trump women and their fashion mishaps thread

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The makeup is so odd. She used to do this well ... why not now?

She looks like Hillary Clinton in this picture.

Not even close, homie.

Sorry to break it to you Ivanka but the comparison is spot-on.

No, Hillary wore non tailored pant suits in senior citizen monotone colors. Hillary wore senior citizen shoes with her pant suits. Hilary's pant suits were probably
not polyester but had that look.

OK, Ivanka looks like she's dressed up as Sexy Hillary Clinton for Halloween

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I have a non-Ivanka nitpick. I hate that a 100% polyester dress retails for $1800. I love certain luxury brands but the increasing use of poly, acrylic, and stretch materials in higher and higher percentages of extremely expensive garments is repulsive and wasteful as hell.

Plus 1. I prefer cotton blends, silk, and wool blends.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Hillary’s face is so much more attractive than Ivanka’s in these images. The douchebro loser who comes in here to troll, drool, and j/o over insect-head Ivanka’s “hotness” is either blind or doesn’t know she has a face.

Also, Hillary’s face is her own. Ivanka’s belongs to the derm and her surgeon. She paid all that money to look like the almost seventh year old popular winner.

Welcome to the resistance, Ivanka?

Orrrr: Welcome to the resistance, Ivanka's surgeon. We welcome you.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The makeup is so odd. She used to do this well ... why not now?

She looks like Hillary Clinton in this picture.

Not even close, homie.

Sorry to break it to you Ivanka but the comparison is spot-on.

No, Hillary wore non tailored pant suits in senior citizen monotone colors. Hillary wore senior citizen shoes with her pant suits. Hilary's pant suits were probably
not polyester but had that look.

Keep up.

[Anonymous]

I missed this when it happened a couple weeks ago.

Ivanka posted for her sister (Tiffany's) birthday. So, interesting (is that the word?) she chose this particular pic.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I missed this when it happened a couple weeks ago.

Ivanka posted for her sister (Tiffany's) birthday. So, interesting (is that the word?) she chose this particular pic.

I think it’s fabulous and artistic.

[Anonymous]

Clearly Ivanka agreed with you ... but there is fabulous art and there is trying to be fabulous art.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

The waist seems off and the sleeves too short.

This is a nice dress and Ivanka has the height to carry it off. Her face these days however looks like a Madam Tussauds replica.

The proportions look off on her. That dress is supposed to hang on a body that is less built up on top, or else is fuller in the bottom - she's got this huge top and no hips or butt, and it makes the dress look really off.

I do appreciate that the dress has pockets. Sisterhood in pockets.

And yeah her face totally looks like it's made of wax.

What is the white peeking out from the hem?

That’s my question, too. The original dress was ankle length. I think this is more cut rate tailoring. If the dress was lined, the lining needs to be hemmed shorter than the dress, so it can’t hang out.

It’s absolutely the lining.

This is amazing from someone who HAD HER OWN FASHION COMPANY.

Which I think tells you all you need to know about how much Ivanka actually did at her own fashion company. Professional, knowledgeable people ran it, she just slapped her name on it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I missed this when it happened a couple weeks ago.

Ivanka posted for her sister (Tiffany's) birthday. So, interesting (is that the word?) she chose this particular pic.

I think it’s fabulous and artistic.

I agree with you but not for the reasons I'm sure you're thinking.

The composition highlights the difference and disconnect between the two figures. At a quick glance, this is what I see:

The women is mature and in a fancy, black dress - the traditional color of mourning or seduction. The child is young,nearly naked and depicted in a style associated with innocence and love.
There appears to be no relationship between the woman and child. It's as if the child were photoshopped into it. There's no warmth, no connection between the two.
The woman is leaning one way, the child another. Again, this emphasizes their distance and lack of relationship
Even the woman's hand on the child's thigh, with it's splayed straight fingers, indicates no possession or care of the child. There is nothing keeping the child from sliding off the couch - the child isn't even sitting on her lap.
The coloring and position of the child indicates she's part of the furniture/decor. She blends into the background. She's an afterthought, a prop. The focus is on the main figure in black.
The child is sucking on a bottle from which no milk could flow with a vacant, distant look in her eyes. She is alone an isolated even though she is surrounded by a woman.

For me, the photo epitomizes the selfishness of Ivanka and how the Trump family treats Tiffany. So, yes, it is fabulous and artistic.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The makeup is so odd. She used to do this well ... why not now?

She looks like Hillary Clinton in this picture.

Not even close, homie.

Sorry to break it to you Ivanka but the comparison is spot-on.

No, Hillary wore non tailored pant suits in senior citizen monotone colors. Hillary wore senior citizen shoes with her pant suits. Hilary's pant suits were probably
not polyester but had that look.

OK, Ivanka looks like she's dressed up as Sexy Hillary Clinton for Halloween

Yes!! Nailed it (so to speak)

[Anonymous]

Let’s be clear, there is no such thing as sexy Hillary Clinton.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

The waist seems off and the sleeves too short.

This is a nice dress and Ivanka has the height to carry it off. Her face these days however looks like a Madam Tussauds replica.

The proportions look off on her. That dress is supposed to hang on a body that is less built up on top, or else is fuller in the bottom - she's got this huge top and no hips or butt, and it makes the dress look really off.

I do appreciate that the dress has pockets. Sisterhood in pockets.

And yeah her face totally looks like it's made of wax.

What is the white peeking out from the hem?

That’s my question, too. The original dress was ankle length. I think this is more cut rate tailoring. If the dress was lined, the lining needs to be hemmed shorter than the dress, so it can’t hang out.

It’s absolutely the lining.

This is amazing from someone who HAD HER OWN FASHION COMPANY.

Which I think tells you all you need to know about how much Ivanka actually did at her own fashion company. Professional, knowledgeable people ran it, she just slapped her name on it.

I mean, that is usually the case with most names. From Kathy Ireland at KMart to Calvin Klein that you can buy at Macy’s, it’s all licensing of a name.

[Anonymous]

https://www.instagram.com/p/B35BqPKBBTx/

ivanka, jared and the kids walking home from church.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:https://www.instagram.com/p/B35BqPKBBTx/

ivanka, jared and the kids walking home from synagogue .

she is channeling Hillary! The short blonde hair and thick headband!

kids are in cardigans and she's in a wool trench. ?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:https://www.instagram.com/p/B35BqPKBBTx/

ivanka, jared and the kids walking home from church.

synagogue