Whistleblower accuses Biden of criminal conduct

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You had no problem with the FBI investigative practices when Hillary was the subject for the better part of the 1990's to 2016.

+1

It didn’t stop in 2016. The whole time Trump was belly aching about politically motivated investigations, he was running a politically motivated investigation. I’m sure all our resident FBI critics will be right by to voice their outrage at Trumps abuses.

No worries. The FBI has now destroyed all evidence they had regarding any Hillary investigations.

Oh look, the Trumpers are just fine with politically motivated investigations so long as they target people they don't like.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You had no problem with the FBI investigative practices when Hillary was the subject for the better part of the 1990's to 2016.

+1

It didn’t stop in 2016. The whole time Trump was belly aching about politically motivated investigations, he was running a politically motivated investigation. I’m sure all our resident FBI critics will be right by to voice their outrage at Trumps abuses.

No worries. The FBI has now destroyed all evidence they had regarding any Hillary investigations.

Oh look, the Trumpers are just fine with politically motivated investigations so long as they target people they don't like.

Actually, I am more interested in why the FBI looked the other way when it came to Clinton but not Trump.
After all, it was the Clinton campaign actually working with Russians.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You had no problem with the FBI investigative practices when Hillary was the subject for the better part of the 1990's to 2016.

+1

It didn’t stop in 2016. The whole time Trump was belly aching about politically motivated investigations, he was running a politically motivated investigation. I’m sure all our resident FBI critics will be right by to voice their outrage at Trumps abuses.

No worries. The FBI has now destroyed all evidence they had regarding any Hillary investigations.

Oh look, the Trumpers are just fine with politically motivated investigations so long as they target people they don't like.

Actually, I am more interested in why the FBI looked the other way when it came to Clinton but not Trump.
After all, it was the Clinton campaign actually working with Russians.

Spending 4 years investigating is hardly looking the other way. There was just nothing there because your conspiracy theories are just that.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You had no problem with the FBI investigative practices when Hillary was the subject for the better part of the 1990's to 2016.

+1

It didn’t stop in 2016. The whole time Trump was belly aching about politically motivated investigations, he was running a politically motivated investigation. I’m sure all our resident FBI critics will be right by to voice their outrage at Trumps abuses.

No worries. The FBI has now destroyed all evidence they had regarding any Hillary investigations.

Oh look, the Trumpers are just fine with politically motivated investigations so long as they target people they don't like.

Actually, I am more interested in why the FBI looked the other way when it came to Clinton but not Trump.
After all, it was the Clinton campaign actually working with Russians.

Spending 4 years investigating is hardly looking the other way. There was just nothing there because your conspiracy theories are just that.

Her campaign actually PAID Russians for phony dirt on Trump. And, then tried to cover up the fact that they paid for it.
That is not "nothing."

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You had no problem with the FBI investigative practices when Hillary was the subject for the better part of the 1990's to 2016.

+1

It didn’t stop in 2016. The whole time Trump was belly aching about politically motivated investigations, he was running a politically motivated investigation. I’m sure all our resident FBI critics will be right by to voice their outrage at Trumps abuses.

No worries. The FBI has now destroyed all evidence they had regarding any Hillary investigations.

Oh look, the Trumpers are just fine with politically motivated investigations so long as they target people they don't like.

Actually, I am more interested in why the FBI looked the other way when it came to Clinton but not Trump.
After all, it was the Clinton campaign actually working with Russians.

Spending 4 years investigating is hardly looking the other way. There was just nothing there because your conspiracy theories are just that.

Her campaign actually PAID Russians for phony dirt on Trump. And, then tried to cover up the fact that they paid for it.
That is not "nothing."

'
Uh huh, sure.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You had no problem with the FBI investigative practices when Hillary was the subject for the better part of the 1990's to 2016.

+1

It didn’t stop in 2016. The whole time Trump was belly aching about politically motivated investigations, he was running a politically motivated investigation. I’m sure all our resident FBI critics will be right by to voice their outrage at Trumps abuses.

No worries. The FBI has now destroyed all evidence they had regarding any Hillary investigations.

Oh look, the Trumpers are just fine with politically motivated investigations so long as they target people they don't like.

Actually, I am more interested in why the FBI looked the other way when it came to Clinton but not Trump.
After all, it was the Clinton campaign actually working with Russians.

Spending 4 years investigating is hardly looking the other way. There was just nothing there because your conspiracy theories are just that.

Her campaign actually PAID Russians for phony dirt on Trump. And, then tried to cover up the fact that they paid for it.
That is not "nothing."

'
Uh huh, sure.

Are you refuting pp’s assertion? Cite?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You had no problem with the FBI investigative practices when Hillary was the subject for the better part of the 1990's to 2016.

+1

It didn’t stop in 2016. The whole time Trump was belly aching about politically motivated investigations, he was running a politically motivated investigation. I’m sure all our resident FBI critics will be right by to voice their outrage at Trumps abuses.

No worries. The FBI has now destroyed all evidence they had regarding any Hillary investigations.

Oh look, the Trumpers are just fine with politically motivated investigations so long as they target people they don't like.

Actually, I am more interested in why the FBI looked the other way when it came to Clinton but not Trump.
After all, it was the Clinton campaign actually working with Russians.

Spending 4 years investigating is hardly looking the other way. There was just nothing there because your conspiracy theories are just that.

Her campaign actually PAID Russians for phony dirt on Trump. And, then tried to cover up the fact that they paid for it.
That is not "nothing."

'
Uh huh, sure.

The FEC fined Mrs. Clinton’s campaign $8,000 and levied a heftier punishment on the DNC, which must pay a $105,000 penalty.
The agency said the two entities “misreported the purpose of certain disbursements.”

The group that filed the FEC complaint accused the Clinton campaign and the DNC of conspiring with foreigners in violation of federal campaign finance law to undermine Mr. Trump, who was then the Republican presidential nominee.

According to the complaint, the Clinton campaign and the DNC used the law firm Perkins Coie to “scheme” with Mr. Steele, a British national, to write and disseminate the salacious and unverified Steele dossier, which was produced using information from current and former Russian government officials.

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2022/mar/30/fec-fines-clinton-campaign-dnc-spending-steele-dos/

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You had no problem with the FBI investigative practices when Hillary was the subject for the better part of the 1990's to 2016.

+1

It didn’t stop in 2016. The whole time Trump was belly aching about politically motivated investigations, he was running a politically motivated investigation. I’m sure all our resident FBI critics will be right by to voice their outrage at Trumps abuses.

No worries. The FBI has now destroyed all evidence they had regarding any Hillary investigations.

Oh look, the Trumpers are just fine with politically motivated investigations so long as they target people they don't like.

+1

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You had no problem with the FBI investigative practices when Hillary was the subject for the better part of the 1990's to 2016.

+1

It didn’t stop in 2016. The whole time Trump was belly aching about politically motivated investigations, he was running a politically motivated investigation. I’m sure all our resident FBI critics will be right by to voice their outrage at Trumps abuses.

No worries. The FBI has now destroyed all evidence they had regarding any Hillary investigations.

Oh look, the Trumpers are just fine with politically motivated investigations so long as they target people they don't like.

Actually, I am more interested in why the FBI looked the other way when it came to Clinton but not Trump.
After all, it was the Clinton campaign actually working with Russians.

Hillary Clinton was investigated thoroughly since the early 1990's - from Whitewater to Vince Foster to Benghazi and Emailzzz.

If you don't think a Trump AG or a W AG or Ken Starr wouldn't have charged her if they found an actual crime, then no one is going to disabuse you of your tin foil hat.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You had no problem with the FBI investigative practices when Hillary was the subject for the better part of the 1990's to 2016.

+1

It didn’t stop in 2016. The whole time Trump was belly aching about politically motivated investigations, he was running a politically motivated investigation. I’m sure all our resident FBI critics will be right by to voice their outrage at Trumps abuses.

No worries. The FBI has now destroyed all evidence they had regarding any Hillary investigations.

Oh look, the Trumpers are just fine with politically motivated investigations so long as they target people they don't like.

Actually, I am more interested in why the FBI looked the other way when it came to Clinton but not Trump.
After all, it was the Clinton campaign actually working with Russians.

Hillary Clinton was investigated thoroughly since the early 1990's - from Whitewater to Vince Foster to Benghazi and Emailzzz.

If you don't think a Trump AG or a W AG or Ken Starr wouldn't have charged her if they found an actual crime, then no one is going to disabuse you of your tin foil hat.

Oh, please. Even Comey admitted she committed crimes when it came to her server.
But, in all his arrogance, HE determined not to bring any charges. Which was NOT his decision to make.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You had no problem with the FBI investigative practices when Hillary was the subject for the better part of the 1990's to 2016.

+1

It didn’t stop in 2016. The whole time Trump was belly aching about politically motivated investigations, he was running a politically motivated investigation. I’m sure all our resident FBI critics will be right by to voice their outrage at Trumps abuses.

No worries. The FBI has now destroyed all evidence they had regarding any Hillary investigations.

Oh look, the Trumpers are just fine with politically motivated investigations so long as they target people they don't like.

Actually, I am more interested in why the FBI looked the other way when it came to Clinton but not Trump.
After all, it was the Clinton campaign actually working with Russians.

Spending 4 years investigating is hardly looking the other way. There was just nothing there because your conspiracy theories are just that.

Her campaign actually PAID Russians for phony dirt on Trump. And, then tried to cover up the fact that they paid for it.
That is not "nothing."

'
Uh huh, sure.

The FEC fined Mrs. Clinton’s campaign $8,000 and levied a heftier punishment on the DNC, which must pay a $105,000 penalty.
The agency said the two entities “misreported the purpose of certain disbursements.”

The group that filed the FEC complaint accused the Clinton campaign and the DNC of conspiring with foreigners in violation of federal campaign finance law to undermine Mr. Trump, who was then the Republican presidential nominee.

According to the complaint, the Clinton campaign and the DNC used the law firm Perkins Coie to “scheme” with Mr. Steele, a British national, to write and disseminate the salacious and unverified Steele dossier, which was produced using information from current and former Russian government officials.

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2022/mar/30/fec-fines-clinton-campaign-dnc-spending-steele-dos/

I'm confused why you posted an article that does NOT say that the Clinton campaign PAID Russian nationals. Were you intentionally trying to disprove your own point?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You had no problem with the FBI investigative practices when Hillary was the subject for the better part of the 1990's to 2016.

+1

It didn’t stop in 2016. The whole time Trump was belly aching about politically motivated investigations, he was running a politically motivated investigation. I’m sure all our resident FBI critics will be right by to voice their outrage at Trumps abuses.

No worries. The FBI has now destroyed all evidence they had regarding any Hillary investigations.

Oh look, the Trumpers are just fine with politically motivated investigations so long as they target people they don't like.

Actually, I am more interested in why the FBI looked the other way when it came to Clinton but not Trump.
After all, it was the Clinton campaign actually working with Russians.

Hillary Clinton was investigated thoroughly since the early 1990's - from Whitewater to Vince Foster to Benghazi and Emailzzz.

If you don't think a Trump AG or a W AG or Ken Starr wouldn't have charged her if they found an actual crime, then no one is going to disabuse you of your tin foil hat.

Oh, please. Even Comey admitted she committed crimes when it came to her server.
But, in all his arrogance, HE determined not to bring any charges. Which was NOT his decision to make.

Just stop. No crimes. No emails that were classified at the time. She received some unclassified emails from her staff that fact-checked newspaper articles, etc., as is normal. After the fact, when every State Dept. and FBI investigator went through her emails, a handful of the staff emails were deemed to have referenced information that came from classified sources, not actual classified documents or classified emails, but things like, “the New York Times article about drone strikes is accurate about this point but not accurate about that point” where how the staffer knew what was true came from a classified source that was not included, named, or referenced in the email. That is the kind of absurd after-the-fact over-classification that is the “classified” information in her emails.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You had no problem with the FBI investigative practices when Hillary was the subject for the better part of the 1990's to 2016.

+1

It didn’t stop in 2016. The whole time Trump was belly aching about politically motivated investigations, he was running a politically motivated investigation. I’m sure all our resident FBI critics will be right by to voice their outrage at Trumps abuses.

No worries. The FBI has now destroyed all evidence they had regarding any Hillary investigations.

Oh look, the Trumpers are just fine with politically motivated investigations so long as they target people they don't like.

Actually, I am more interested in why the FBI looked the other way when it came to Clinton but not Trump.
After all, it was the Clinton campaign actually working with Russians.

Exactly.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You had no problem with the FBI investigative practices when Hillary was the subject for the better part of the 1990's to 2016.

+1

It didn’t stop in 2016. The whole time Trump was belly aching about politically motivated investigations, he was running a politically motivated investigation. I’m sure all our resident FBI critics will be right by to voice their outrage at Trumps abuses.

No worries. The FBI has now destroyed all evidence they had regarding any Hillary investigations.

Oh look, the Trumpers are just fine with politically motivated investigations so long as they target people they don't like.

Actually, I am more interested in why the FBI looked the other way when it came to Clinton but not Trump.
After all, it was the Clinton campaign actually working with Russians.

Exactly.

Not exactly. Trump's first campaign manager was an umdeclared foreign agent working for Russian interests.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You had no problem with the FBI investigative practices when Hillary was the subject for the better part of the 1990's to 2016.

+1

It didn’t stop in 2016. The whole time Trump was belly aching about politically motivated investigations, he was running a politically motivated investigation. I’m sure all our resident FBI critics will be right by to voice their outrage at Trumps abuses.

Google it.

John Podesta sworn deposition 50 percent DNC 50 percent Hillarty Clinton paid dossier

No worries. The FBI has now destroyed all evidence they had regarding any Hillary investigations.

Oh look, the Trumpers are just fine with politically motivated investigations so long as they target people they don't like.

Actually, I am more interested in why the FBI looked the other way when it came to Clinton but not Trump.
After all, it was the Clinton campaign actually working with Russians.

Spending 4 years investigating is hardly looking the other way. There was just nothing there because your conspiracy theories are just that.

Her campaign actually PAID Russians for phony dirt on Trump. And, then tried to cover up the fact that they paid for it.
That is not "nothing."

'
Uh huh, sure.

The FEC fined Mrs. Clinton’s campaign $8,000 and levied a heftier punishment on the DNC, which must pay a $105,000 penalty.
The agency said the two entities “misreported the purpose of certain disbursements.”

The group that filed the FEC complaint accused the Clinton campaign and the DNC of conspiring with foreigners in violation of federal campaign finance law to undermine Mr. Trump, who was then the Republican presidential nominee.

According to the complaint, the Clinton campaign and the DNC used the law firm Perkins Coie to “scheme” with Mr. Steele, a British national, to write and disseminate the salacious and unverified Steele dossier, which was produced using information from current and former Russian government officials.

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2022/mar/30/fec-fines-clinton-campaign-dnc-spending-steele-dos/

I'm confused why you posted an article that does NOT say that the Clinton campaign PAID Russian nationals. Were you intentionally trying to disprove your own point?