How is the Supreme Court confirmation going to go?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Bam. ACB nailed Klobuchar with RBG’s own words. Nicely done.

I'm so glad that "owning" a "lib" Senator with a deceased Justice's words, when that Justice has been dead not even a month, is giving you such joy, and is now apparently the purpose of Senate confirmation hearings and the highest court in our country. Do you even hear yourself?

What are you nattering on about? The point was that she very aptly paraphrased a revered justice’s words regarding giving her personal opinions: “No hints, no previews, no forecasts.” Klobuchar couldn’t argue with that. Why on earth are you?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think Barrett is definitely holding her own.

Really? Do tell.

The fact that she couldn't answer this question or the one about delaying an election, on which the law is also clear, is egregious.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:According to the Economist, she is least popular SC nominee in recent history:

https://www.economist.com/graphic-detail/2020/10/12/amy-coney-barrett-is-the-least-popular-supreme-court-nominee-in-recent-history

I've subscribed to the economist from 1988 until November 2016 when their apolitical free market approached changed to globalism with leaders who protected it. PP just proved why I deleted my subscription.

+100

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Bam. ACB nailed Klobuchar with RBG’s own words. Nicely done.

I'm so glad that "owning" a "lib" Senator with a deceased Justice's words, when that Justice has been dead not even a month, is giving you such joy, and is now apparently the purpose of Senate confirmation hearings and the highest court in our country. Do you even hear yourself?

The fact that she doesn't hesitate to weaponize very select RBG words, taken out of original context, despite the offense it causes to RBG'S many admirers tells me all I need to know about what a horrible person she is.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Bam. ACB nailed Klobuchar with RBG’s own words. Nicely done.

I'm so glad that "owning" a "lib" Senator with a deceased Justice's words, when that Justice has been dead not even a month, is giving you such joy, and is now apparently the purpose of Senate confirmation hearings and the highest court in our country. Do you even hear yourself?

What are you nattering on about? The point was that she very aptly paraphrased a revered justice’s words regarding giving her personal opinions: “No hints, no previews, no forecasts.” Klobuchar couldn’t argue with that. Why on earth are you?

Are you cool with her aptly paraphrasing that it's ok to call black people the n-word at work?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:According to the Economist, she is least popular SC nominee in recent history:

https://www.economist.com/graphic-detail/2020/10/12/amy-coney-barrett-is-the-least-popular-supreme-court-nominee-in-recent-history

Well, she did say that it's ok to use the n-word at work...

What??? Cite on that?

It's earlier in this thread.

But it's worth a refresher:

Appears that she made a sound legal decision.

Agreed. Honestly, I think her detractors take the most scandalous sound byte and run with it - looks like they didn’t even bother to read her own words.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:According to the Economist, she is least popular SC nominee in recent history:

https://www.economist.com/graphic-detail/2020/10/12/amy-coney-barrett-is-the-least-popular-supreme-court-nominee-in-recent-history

Well, she did say that it's ok to use the n-word at work...

What??? Cite on that?

It's earlier in this thread.

But it's worth a refresher:

Appears that she made a sound legal decision.

Agreed. Honestly, I think her detractors take the most scandalous sound byte and run with it - looks like they didn’t even bother to read her own words.

You think black people are happy to be called the n-word? Do you call them that?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This is holder her own?

No, she is a political hack with minimal jurist experience or curiousity. It is so sad the the bar in our country has been lowered to the idea that people like Judge Barrett or Justice Kavanaugh are keen intellectuals.

Gorisch, Roberts? Sure.

These two, not so much.

She has no business stating her personal opinion in a HYPOTHETICAL case, you twit. She is absolutely correct. And Klobuchar knew it. ACB is very much holding her own.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:According to the Economist, she is least popular SC nominee in recent history:

https://www.economist.com/graphic-detail/2020/10/12/amy-coney-barrett-is-the-least-popular-supreme-court-nominee-in-recent-history

I've subscribed to the economist from 1988 until November 2016 when their apolitical free market approached changed to globalism with leaders who protected it. PP just proved why I deleted my subscription.

+100

Don't see anyone criticizing their polling methodology though, right? Sorry to remind you--you are in the minority party which wouldn't have a prayer in national elections were it not for the electoral college syste rigged in its favor. Barrett is unpopular because the majority of Americans dislike the profound hypocrisy of Graham's "Play my words back to me--you'd be right to" GOP and the majority also do not agree with originalist law or her conservative jurisprudence.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Bam. ACB nailed Klobuchar with RBG’s own words. Nicely done.

I'm so glad that "owning" a "lib" Senator with a deceased Justice's words, when that Justice has been dead not even a month, is giving you such joy, and is now apparently the purpose of Senate confirmation hearings and the highest court in our country. Do you even hear yourself?

The fact that she doesn't hesitate to weaponize very select RBG words, taken out of original context, despite the offense it causes to RBG'S many admirers tells me all I need to know about what a horrible person she is.

Yes her cynical strategy is disgraceful.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Bam. ACB nailed Klobuchar with RBG’s own words. Nicely done.

I'm so glad that "owning" a "lib" Senator with a deceased Justice's words, when that Justice has been dead not even a month, is giving you such joy, and is now apparently the purpose of Senate confirmation hearings and the highest court in our country. Do you even hear yourself?

The fact that she doesn't hesitate to weaponize very select RBG words, taken out of original context, despite the offense it causes to RBG'S many admirers tells me all I need to know about what a horrible person she is.

PP here who was told I was "nattering" (is that a word?). This. Couldn't have said it better. It's also just too cute by half. "Look at me, I know what RBG said!"

[Anonymous]

"I'm not here to destroy the ACA" - ACB

She is humble and fair even while Coons tries otherwise.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:According to the Economist, she is least popular SC nominee in recent history:

https://www.economist.com/graphic-detail/2020/10/12/amy-coney-barrett-is-the-least-popular-supreme-court-nominee-in-recent-history

Well, she did say that it's ok to use the n-word at work...

What??? Cite on that?

It's earlier in this thread.

But it's worth a refresher:

Appears that she made a sound legal decision.

If you're racist, sure.

+1
That is appalling.

Does she think black people are happy to be called the n-word or something? Based on historical precedent of slavery and segregation?

she’s substituting her own “common sense” for how the black plaintiff experienced the word. This is exactly what she needs to be grilled on - this was not a decision about the law, but a decision about what SHE personally believes the word means.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:"I'm not here to destroy the ACA" - ACB

She is humble and fair even while Coons tries otherwise.

Her professional history says otherwise

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Bam. ACB nailed Klobuchar with RBG’s own words. Nicely done.

I'm so glad that "owning" a "lib" Senator with a deceased Justice's words, when that Justice has been dead not even a month, is giving you such joy, and is now apparently the purpose of Senate confirmation hearings and the highest court in our country. Do you even hear yourself?

What are you nattering on about? The point was that she very aptly paraphrased a revered justice’s words regarding giving her personal opinions: “No hints, no previews, no forecasts.” Klobuchar couldn’t argue with that. Why on earth are you?

Are you cool with her aptly paraphrasing that it's ok to call black people the n-word at work?

The fact that you’re twisting her actual words to suit your obviously biased narrative is so telling. Take your outrage out of the picture and read her decision - a decision, btw, that was the MAJORITY.