Kate Middleton looks really happy lately

[Anonymous]

If she had a thing for British accent, that's very common and not social climbing.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Was Lady Diana not a social climber? Why would a stunningly gorgeous woman with an inheritance marry a much older, balding, average looking and boring man who is already in love with a forbidden woman?

Of corse Diana was. I think both Kate and Diana are (were, respectively) social climbers.

Yes but then would you count Meghan and her mom as social climbers as well?

DP and I do think Meghan and her mom are strivers but I don't think Meghan is in the same category as Diana and Kate, both of whom I think married with the specific intent to marry into the royal family and become royals. Whereas I think Meghan is an opportunist who has always looked for ways to earn more money or gain more social status, whether through her acting career, her influencer website, or social media. I think Meghan genuinely fell for Harry and then looked for ways to make that work "synergistically" for her because that's how her brain works -- how does this play into my brand? how do I pivot my career to work with the BRF and this relationship? I don't think becoming a Princess was her ultimate goal, but she did seek to exploit it (and still does) to her benefit because I think she's always looking for more financial security and social leverage.

Whereas for Kate/Diana, the marriage and becoming Princess was the thing. In both cases because their families wanted/needed them to, but Kate was obviously much better prepared for the role and I think ultimately wanted the public-facing and responsibility side of it, whereas I think Diana just wanted the clothes and the parties, at least at first (eventually I do think she appreciated the way her position allowed her to help people she cared about, and overlooking her work with AIDS patients or land mine survivors shortchanges her, even if it's okay to acknowledge she was pretty shallow and not terribly intellectual most of her life).

Yes, but she had been seeking out British titled guys to date for a while. And she jumped at the chance to meet Harry and pursued him. She didn't have as realistic a plan and goal as Kate did but she wanted to marry a title, something that few American women really seek out in any way.

What do you base this on?

Meghan asked Harry’s childhood friend, Violet von Westenholz, to show Harry her Instagram picture. At the time Violet was repping Ralph Lauren and Meghan was in London to merch Ralph Lauren at Wimbledon. Meghan told Violet and other acquaintances from Soho House that she wanted to marry a rich Englishmen. It has been in theyr various interviews. Meghan was pushing 40 and the sex kitten roles dried up. She needed a 401K and some anchor babies before her biological click ran down

In my close in affluent area, this os not unusual fir women whose PR and media careers were based on looks and needed a retirement plan

Meghan just did it on a larger scale.

Why a rich Englishman vs. American or other nationality?

I am an Anglophile and follow a website with Brits who get some good gossip about the aristos. One speculated that because many upper class English men are sent to boarding schools at 8 to 10 years old, they are separated from Mi others at an early age and are easily controlled by women who become mommies to them. It somewhat fits with Harry listing his mother at age 12.

I know it is just speculation, but it is interesting. When I worked in London, there were public school men who had clear mommy issues.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Was Lady Diana not a social climber? Why would a stunningly gorgeous woman with an inheritance marry a much older, balding, average looking and boring man who is already in love with a forbidden woman?

Of corse Diana was. I think both Kate and Diana are (were, respectively) social climbers.

Yes but then would you count Meghan and her mom as social climbers as well?

Meghan, yea. Her mom…why? She hasn’t really received any benefit from Meghan being royal and unlike the Middleton’s doesn’t have (had) the type of business that benefits from the association.

+1, this is one of those allegations that feels transparently racist. I think a lot of people saw a black woman as the MIB at a royal wedding and felt she was way above her station, thus the idea that she's social climbing. But I bet you anything she would have preferred Meghan marry some American or Canadian actor/celeb and settle nearby in LA and not deal with all the BS they've been through in the last 7 years. I'm sure she likes Harry well enough and loves her grandkids, but it's not like Meghan was broke or struggling before Harry. She was on a successful TV show, making money, had a good and extensive group of friends.

I think in some ways Meghan got very unlucky in meeting Harry when she did, because she fell for him, they got married, and because of their age they immediately had kids, and now she's in the royal family in some capacity forever. I don't really think that's what Meghan's mom wanted for her, to be perfectly honest.

I loved their whole wedding but I thought her mother was particularly elegant.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Was Lady Diana not a social climber? Why would a stunningly gorgeous woman with an inheritance marry a much older, balding, average looking and boring man who is already in love with a forbidden woman?

Of corse Diana was. I think both Kate and Diana are (were, respectively) social climbers.

Yes but then would you count Meghan and her mom as social climbers as well?

DP and I do think Meghan and her mom are strivers but I don't think Meghan is in the same category as Diana and Kate, both of whom I think married with the specific intent to marry into the royal family and become royals. Whereas I think Meghan is an opportunist who has always looked for ways to earn more money or gain more social status, whether through her acting career, her influencer website, or social media. I think Meghan genuinely fell for Harry and then looked for ways to make that work "synergistically" for her because that's how her brain works -- how does this play into my brand? how do I pivot my career to work with the BRF and this relationship? I don't think becoming a Princess was her ultimate goal, but she did seek to exploit it (and still does) to her benefit because I think she's always looking for more financial security and social leverage.

Whereas for Kate/Diana, the marriage and becoming Princess was the thing. In both cases because their families wanted/needed them to, but Kate was obviously much better prepared for the role and I think ultimately wanted the public-facing and responsibility side of it, whereas I think Diana just wanted the clothes and the parties, at least at first (eventually I do think she appreciated the way her position allowed her to help people she cared about, and overlooking her work with AIDS patients or land mine survivors shortchanges her, even if it's okay to acknowledge she was pretty shallow and not terribly intellectual most of her life).

Yes, but she had been seeking out British titled guys to date for a while. And she jumped at the chance to meet Harry and pursued him. She didn't have as realistic a plan and goal as Kate did but she wanted to marry a title, something that few American women really seek out in any way.

What do you base this on?

DP, I have seen this rumor posted on DCUM and nowhere else. At this point it seems pretty established that they became aware of each other via a mutual friend on Instagram and then were introduced by said friend (Violet von Westenholz, who knows Harry from their youth and met Meghan because she worked in PR for Ralph Lauren at the time) in London a short while later. There is zero evidence that Meghan was on the prowl for "British titled guys" and she has no known dating history in that set. She had few if any British friends and had not spent much time in the UK. She was also married until 2014.

https://www.yahoo.com/video/meghan-markle-asked-lizzy-cundy-to-help-her-find-a-famous-british-guy-and-then-ghosted-her-when-she-met-harry-090701263.html?
https://www.thesun.co.uk/tvandshowbiz/9116963/meghan-markle-lizzie-cundy-british-man/
https://www.hola.com/us/celebrities/2016111419628/meghan-markle-talks-her-love-for-british-guys/
https://pagesix.com/2021/06/12/meghan-markle-passed-over-by-soccer-star-before-meeting-prince-harry/

That said, who cares if either of them were 'chasing' anyone. This is not uncommon and we see plenty of examples here.

Sorry, but Markle saying she finds British accents sexy in 2013 and then the whining of Lizzie Cundy aren't exactly "evidence." I also find British accents sexy, am I secretly trying to marry into the royal family? Cundy was hawking a book and knew that any "dirt" on Meghan or Meghan and Harry would help it sell, which it did. But what does she actually even say? That Meghan once told her she loved English guys and was looking for men to date? She was in the midst of a divorce, that doesn't sound weird to me. Dating someone in London, as opposed to Toronto or LA, was probably appealing for a variety of reasons at that stage in her life.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Was Lady Diana not a social climber? Why would a stunningly gorgeous woman with an inheritance marry a much older, balding, average looking and boring man who is already in love with a forbidden woman?

Of corse Diana was. I think both Kate and Diana are (were, respectively) social climbers.

Yes but then would you count Meghan and her mom as social climbers as well?

DP and I do think Meghan and her mom are strivers but I don't think Meghan is in the same category as Diana and Kate, both of whom I think married with the specific intent to marry into the royal family and become royals. Whereas I think Meghan is an opportunist who has always looked for ways to earn more money or gain more social status, whether through her acting career, her influencer website, or social media. I think Meghan genuinely fell for Harry and then looked for ways to make that work "synergistically" for her because that's how her brain works -- how does this play into my brand? how do I pivot my career to work with the BRF and this relationship? I don't think becoming a Princess was her ultimate goal, but she did seek to exploit it (and still does) to her benefit because I think she's always looking for more financial security and social leverage.

Whereas for Kate/Diana, the marriage and becoming Princess was the thing. In both cases because their families wanted/needed them to, but Kate was obviously much better prepared for the role and I think ultimately wanted the public-facing and responsibility side of it, whereas I think Diana just wanted the clothes and the parties, at least at first (eventually I do think she appreciated the way her position allowed her to help people she cared about, and overlooking her work with AIDS patients or land mine survivors shortchanges her, even if it's okay to acknowledge she was pretty shallow and not terribly intellectual most of her life).

Yes, but she had been seeking out British titled guys to date for a while. And she jumped at the chance to meet Harry and pursued him. She didn't have as realistic a plan and goal as Kate did but she wanted to marry a title, something that few American women really seek out in any way.

What do you base this on?

DP, I have seen this rumor posted on DCUM and nowhere else. At this point it seems pretty established that they became aware of each other via a mutual friend on Instagram and then were introduced by said friend (Violet von Westenholz, who knows Harry from their youth and met Meghan because she worked in PR for Ralph Lauren at the time) in London a short while later. There is zero evidence that Meghan was on the prowl for "British titled guys" and she has no known dating history in that set. She had few if any British friends and had not spent much time in the UK. She was also married until 2014.

https://www.yahoo.com/video/meghan-markle-asked-lizzy-cundy-to-help-her-find-a-famous-british-guy-and-then-ghosted-her-when-she-met-harry-090701263.html?
https://www.thesun.co.uk/tvandshowbiz/9116963/meghan-markle-lizzie-cundy-british-man/
https://www.hola.com/us/celebrities/2016111419628/meghan-markle-talks-her-love-for-british-guys/
https://pagesix.com/2021/06/12/meghan-markle-passed-over-by-soccer-star-before-meeting-prince-harry/

That said, who cares if either of them were 'chasing' anyone. This is not uncommon and we see plenty of examples here.

Sorry, but Markle saying she finds British accents sexy in 2013 and then the whining of Lizzie Cundy aren't exactly "evidence." I also find British accents sexy, am I secretly trying to marry into the royal family? Cundy was hawking a book and knew that any "dirt" on Meghan or Meghan and Harry would help it sell, which it did. But what does she actually even say? That Meghan once told her she loved English guys and was looking for men to date? She was in the midst of a divorce, that doesn't sound weird to me. Dating someone in London, as opposed to Toronto or LA, was probably appealing for a variety of reasons at that stage in her life.

Only someone who is naive or disingenuous would say this...

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Since the ball boy thread was removed: if anyone is interested. There is a YouTube of Kate and Roger Federer training with the ball boys and girls in which Kate interacts with many of them. She acknowledges a mistake and then plats a set with Federer

The ball boys and girls at Wimbledon meet and see the best tennis players in the world. That may be more important to these tennis players than a handshake from a royal.

As a tennis fan I’m sure they don’t care about the royals and are there to see the professionals.

Also not to nitpick but there is no way Federer and Kate “played a set”. Maybe they hit some balls around but as good of a recreational player as Kate is there’s no chance she could even return one of his serves. He’s one of the greatest tennis players of all time a D1 women’s tennis athlete would have a hard time keeping up with him.

Wut

What is confusing? Playing a set in tennis means playing a number of games. Roger Federer is an elite tennis player. Kate is not. I don’t believe Kate could play a number of games against Federer.

DP. There's a reason that people prefer to watch women's tennis, fwiw. In women's tennis, they return serves, unlike men's.

You try returning a 140 mph serve

Right. In men's tennis, no one returns serves.

But that's boring. In women's tennis, they volley. Much better to watch.

Agree.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Was Lady Diana not a social climber? Why would a stunningly gorgeous woman with an inheritance marry a much older, balding, average looking and boring man who is already in love with a forbidden woman?

Of corse Diana was. I think both Kate and Diana are (were, respectively) social climbers.

Yes but then would you count Meghan and her mom as social climbers as well?

DP and I do think Meghan and her mom are strivers but I don't think Meghan is in the same category as Diana and Kate, both of whom I think married with the specific intent to marry into the royal family and become royals. Whereas I think Meghan is an opportunist who has always looked for ways to earn more money or gain more social status, whether through her acting career, her influencer website, or social media. I think Meghan genuinely fell for Harry and then looked for ways to make that work "synergistically" for her because that's how her brain works -- how does this play into my brand? how do I pivot my career to work with the BRF and this relationship? I don't think becoming a Princess was her ultimate goal, but she did seek to exploit it (and still does) to her benefit because I think she's always looking for more financial security and social leverage.

Whereas for Kate/Diana, the marriage and becoming Princess was the thing. In both cases because their families wanted/needed them to, but Kate was obviously much better prepared for the role and I think ultimately wanted the public-facing and responsibility side of it, whereas I think Diana just wanted the clothes and the parties, at least at first (eventually I do think she appreciated the way her position allowed her to help people she cared about, and overlooking her work with AIDS patients or land mine survivors shortchanges her, even if it's okay to acknowledge she was pretty shallow and not terribly intellectual most of her life).

Yes, but she had been seeking out British titled guys to date for a while. And she jumped at the chance to meet Harry and pursued him. She didn't have as realistic a plan and goal as Kate did but she wanted to marry a title, something that few American women really seek out in any way.

What do you base this on?

DP, I have seen this rumor posted on DCUM and nowhere else. At this point it seems pretty established that they became aware of each other via a mutual friend on Instagram and then were introduced by said friend (Violet von Westenholz, who knows Harry from their youth and met Meghan because she worked in PR for Ralph Lauren at the time) in London a short while later. There is zero evidence that Meghan was on the prowl for "British titled guys" and she has no known dating history in that set. She had few if any British friends and had not spent much time in the UK. She was also married until 2014.

https://www.yahoo.com/video/meghan-markle-asked-lizzy-cundy-to-help-her-find-a-famous-british-guy-and-then-ghosted-her-when-she-met-harry-090701263.html?
https://www.thesun.co.uk/tvandshowbiz/9116963/meghan-markle-lizzie-cundy-british-man/
https://www.hola.com/us/celebrities/2016111419628/meghan-markle-talks-her-love-for-british-guys/
https://pagesix.com/2021/06/12/meghan-markle-passed-over-by-soccer-star-before-meeting-prince-harry/

That said, who cares if either of them were 'chasing' anyone. This is not uncommon and we see plenty of examples here.

Sorry, but Markle saying she finds British accents sexy in 2013 and then the whining of Lizzie Cundy aren't exactly "evidence." I also find British accents sexy, am I secretly trying to marry into the royal family? Cundy was hawking a book and knew that any "dirt" on Meghan or Meghan and Harry would help it sell, which it did. But what does she actually even say? That Meghan once told her she loved English guys and was looking for men to date? She was in the midst of a divorce, that doesn't sound weird to me. Dating someone in London, as opposed to Toronto or LA, was probably appealing for a variety of reasons at that stage in her life.

Someone said they had not seen evidence of MMs' british social climbing. I provided context. And l like I said, who cares if she was.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Was Lady Diana not a social climber? Why would a stunningly gorgeous woman with an inheritance marry a much older, balding, average looking and boring man who is already in love with a forbidden woman?

Of corse Diana was. I think both Kate and Diana are (were, respectively) social climbers.

Yes but then would you count Meghan and her mom as social climbers as well?

DP and I do think Meghan and her mom are strivers but I don't think Meghan is in the same category as Diana and Kate, both of whom I think married with the specific intent to marry into the royal family and become royals. Whereas I think Meghan is an opportunist who has always looked for ways to earn more money or gain more social status, whether through her acting career, her influencer website, or social media. I think Meghan genuinely fell for Harry and then looked for ways to make that work "synergistically" for her because that's how her brain works -- how does this play into my brand? how do I pivot my career to work with the BRF and this relationship? I don't think becoming a Princess was her ultimate goal, but she did seek to exploit it (and still does) to her benefit because I think she's always looking for more financial security and social leverage.

Whereas for Kate/Diana, the marriage and becoming Princess was the thing. In both cases because their families wanted/needed them to, but Kate was obviously much better prepared for the role and I think ultimately wanted the public-facing and responsibility side of it, whereas I think Diana just wanted the clothes and the parties, at least at first (eventually I do think she appreciated the way her position allowed her to help people she cared about, and overlooking her work with AIDS patients or land mine survivors shortchanges her, even if it's okay to acknowledge she was pretty shallow and not terribly intellectual most of her life).

Yes, but she had been seeking out British titled guys to date for a while. And she jumped at the chance to meet Harry and pursued him. She didn't have as realistic a plan and goal as Kate did but she wanted to marry a title, something that few American women really seek out in any way.

What do you base this on?

Meghan asked Harry’s childhood friend, Violet von Westenholz, to show Harry her Instagram picture. At the time Violet was repping Ralph Lauren and Meghan was in London to merch Ralph Lauren at Wimbledon. Meghan told Violet and other acquaintances from Soho House that she wanted to marry a rich Englishmen. It has been in theyr various interviews. Meghan was pushing 40 and the sex kitten roles dried up. She needed a 401K and some anchor babies before her biological click ran down

In my close in affluent area, this os not unusual fir women whose PR and media careers were based on looks and needed a retirement plan

Meghan just did it on a larger scale.

Why a rich Englishman vs. American or other nationality?

I am an Anglophile and follow a website with Brits who get some good gossip about the aristos. One speculated that because many upper class English men are sent to boarding schools at 8 to 10 years old, they are separated from Mi others at an early age and are easily controlled by women who become mommies to them. It somewhat fits with Harry listing his mother at age 12.

I know it is just speculation, but it is interesting. When I worked in London, there were public school men who had clear mommy issues.

Ooooh. Which website?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Was Lady Diana not a social climber? Why would a stunningly gorgeous woman with an inheritance marry a much older, balding, average looking and boring man who is already in love with a forbidden woman?

Of corse Diana was. I think both Kate and Diana are (were, respectively) social climbers.

Yes but then would you count Meghan and her mom as social climbers as well?

DP and I do think Meghan and her mom are strivers but I don't think Meghan is in the same category as Diana and Kate, both of whom I think married with the specific intent to marry into the royal family and become royals. Whereas I think Meghan is an opportunist who has always looked for ways to earn more money or gain more social status, whether through her acting career, her influencer website, or social media. I think Meghan genuinely fell for Harry and then looked for ways to make that work "synergistically" for her because that's how her brain works -- how does this play into my brand? how do I pivot my career to work with the BRF and this relationship? I don't think becoming a Princess was her ultimate goal, but she did seek to exploit it (and still does) to her benefit because I think she's always looking for more financial security and social leverage.

Whereas for Kate/Diana, the marriage and becoming Princess was the thing. In both cases because their families wanted/needed them to, but Kate was obviously much better prepared for the role and I think ultimately wanted the public-facing and responsibility side of it, whereas I think Diana just wanted the clothes and the parties, at least at first (eventually I do think she appreciated the way her position allowed her to help people she cared about, and overlooking her work with AIDS patients or land mine survivors shortchanges her, even if it's okay to acknowledge she was pretty shallow and not terribly intellectual most of her life).

Yes, but she had been seeking out British titled guys to date for a while. And she jumped at the chance to meet Harry and pursued him. She didn't have as realistic a plan and goal as Kate did but she wanted to marry a title, something that few American women really seek out in any way.

What do you base this on?

DP, I have seen this rumor posted on DCUM and nowhere else. At this point it seems pretty established that they became aware of each other via a mutual friend on Instagram and then were introduced by said friend (Violet von Westenholz, who knows Harry from their youth and met Meghan because she worked in PR for Ralph Lauren at the time) in London a short while later. There is zero evidence that Meghan was on the prowl for "British titled guys" and she has no known dating history in that set. She had few if any British friends and had not spent much time in the UK. She was also married until 2014.

https://www.yahoo.com/video/meghan-markle-asked-lizzy-cundy-to-help-her-find-a-famous-british-guy-and-then-ghosted-her-when-she-met-harry-090701263.html?
https://www.thesun.co.uk/tvandshowbiz/9116963/meghan-markle-lizzie-cundy-british-man/
https://www.hola.com/us/celebrities/2016111419628/meghan-markle-talks-her-love-for-british-guys/
https://pagesix.com/2021/06/12/meghan-markle-passed-over-by-soccer-star-before-meeting-prince-harry/

That said, who cares if either of them were 'chasing' anyone. This is not uncommon and we see plenty of examples here.

Sorry, but Markle saying she finds British accents sexy in 2013 and then the whining of Lizzie Cundy aren't exactly "evidence." I also find British accents sexy, am I secretly trying to marry into the royal family? Cundy was hawking a book and knew that any "dirt" on Meghan or Meghan and Harry would help it sell, which it did. But what does she actually even say? That Meghan once told her she loved English guys and was looking for men to date? She was in the midst of a divorce, that doesn't sound weird to me. Dating someone in London, as opposed to Toronto or LA, was probably appealing for a variety of reasons at that stage in her life.

Only someone who is naive or disingenuous would say this...

To be fair Meghan was living with a high profile man in Toronto when she began dating Harry. Probably not a good idea to date someone else in Toronto.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Was Lady Diana not a social climber? Why would a stunningly gorgeous woman with an inheritance marry a much older, balding, average looking and boring man who is already in love with a forbidden woman?

Of corse Diana was. I think both Kate and Diana are (were, respectively) social climbers.

Yes but then would you count Meghan and her mom as social climbers as well?

Meghan, yea. Her mom…why? She hasn’t really received any benefit from Meghan being royal and unlike the Middleton’s doesn’t have (had) the type of business that benefits from the association.

+1, this is one of those allegations that feels transparently racist. I think a lot of people saw a black woman as the MIB at a royal wedding and felt she was way above her station, thus the idea that she's social climbing. But I bet you anything she would have preferred Meghan marry some American or Canadian actor/celeb and settle nearby in LA and not deal with all the BS they've been through in the last 7 years. I'm sure she likes Harry well enough and loves her grandkids, but it's not like Meghan was broke or struggling before Harry. She was on a successful TV show, making money, had a good and extensive group of friends.

I think in some ways Meghan got very unlucky in meeting Harry when she did, because she fell for him, they got married, and because of their age they immediately had kids, and now she's in the royal family in some capacity forever. I don't really think that's what Meghan's mom wanted for her, to be perfectly honest.

I loved their whole wedding but I thought her mother was particularly elegant.

She was and looked more more classy than Elizbeth and Camilla.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Piers Morgan also said MM ghosted him.

I doubt she was interested in him, probably meeting to network.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Was Lady Diana not a social climber? Why would a stunningly gorgeous woman with an inheritance marry a much older, balding, average looking and boring man who is already in love with a forbidden woman?

Of corse Diana was. I think both Kate and Diana are (were, respectively) social climbers.

Yes but then would you count Meghan and her mom as social climbers as well?

Meghan, yea. Her mom…why? She hasn’t really received any benefit from Meghan being royal and unlike the Middleton’s doesn’t have (had) the type of business that benefits from the association.

+1, this is one of those allegations that feels transparently racist. I think a lot of people saw a black woman as the MIB at a royal wedding and felt she was way above her station, thus the idea that she's social climbing. But I bet you anything she would have preferred Meghan marry some American or Canadian actor/celeb and settle nearby in LA and not deal with all the BS they've been through in the last 7 years. I'm sure she likes Harry well enough and loves her grandkids, but it's not like Meghan was broke or struggling before Harry. She was on a successful TV show, making money, had a good and extensive group of friends.

I think in some ways Meghan got very unlucky in meeting Harry when she did, because she fell for him, they got married, and because of their age they immediately had kids, and now she's in the royal family in some capacity forever. I don't really think that's what Meghan's mom wanted for her, to be perfectly honest.

I loved their whole wedding but I thought her mother was particularly elegant.

She was and looked more more classy than Elizbeth and Camilla.

“Looked” classy rather than “is” classy. She deserted Meghan when she was 2 years old, returned when she was 9 and Meghan’s father was the custodial parent. Meghan had only a slight relationship with her mother until she needed at least one relative at the wedding. Meghan set her up in a dubious home health care business with no employees. It is similar to the business that Thomas Markel set up for her in which she paid no taxes. Markel bailed her out to avoid jail for her and this caused his bankruptcy.

Look a little more into Doria Ragland’s before you judge a book by its cover

Don’t try to play the race card. I am blacker than Meghan or her mother.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Was Lady Diana not a social climber? Why would a stunningly gorgeous woman with an inheritance marry a much older, balding, average looking and boring man who is already in love with a forbidden woman?

Of corse Diana was. I think both Kate and Diana are (were, respectively) social climbers.

Yes but then would you count Meghan and her mom as social climbers as well?

Meghan, yea. Her mom…why? She hasn’t really received any benefit from Meghan being royal and unlike the Middleton’s doesn’t have (had) the type of business that benefits from the association.

+1, this is one of those allegations that feels transparently racist. I think a lot of people saw a black woman as the MIB at a royal wedding and felt she was way above her station, thus the idea that she's social climbing. But I bet you anything she would have preferred Meghan marry some American or Canadian actor/celeb and settle nearby in LA and not deal with all the BS they've been through in the last 7 years. I'm sure she likes Harry well enough and loves her grandkids, but it's not like Meghan was broke or struggling before Harry. She was on a successful TV show, making money, had a good and extensive group of friends.

I think in some ways Meghan got very unlucky in meeting Harry when she did, because she fell for him, they got married, and because of their age they immediately had kids, and now she's in the royal family in some capacity forever. I don't really think that's what Meghan's mom wanted for her, to be perfectly honest.

I loved their whole wedding but I thought her mother was particularly elegant.

She was and looked more more classy than Elizbeth and Camilla.

“Looked” classy rather than “is” classy. She deserted Meghan when she was 2 years old, returned when she was 9 and Meghan’s father was the custodial parent. Meghan had only a slight relationship with her mother until she needed at least one relative at the wedding. Meghan set her up in a dubious home health care business with no employees. It is similar to the business that Thomas Markel set up for her in which she paid no taxes. Markel bailed her out to avoid jail for her and this caused his bankruptcy.

Look a little more into Doria Ragland’s before you judge a book by its cover

Don’t try to play the race card. I am blacker than Meghan or her mother.

These are all unsubstantiated rumors.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Was Lady Diana not a social climber? Why would a stunningly gorgeous woman with an inheritance marry a much older, balding, average looking and boring man who is already in love with a forbidden woman?

Of corse Diana was. I think both Kate and Diana are (were, respectively) social climbers.

Yes but then would you count Meghan and her mom as social climbers as well?

Meghan, yea. Her mom…why? She hasn’t really received any benefit from Meghan being royal and unlike the Middleton’s doesn’t have (had) the type of business that benefits from the association.

+1, this is one of those allegations that feels transparently racist. I think a lot of people saw a black woman as the MIB at a royal wedding and felt she was way above her station, thus the idea that she's social climbing. But I bet you anything she would have preferred Meghan marry some American or Canadian actor/celeb and settle nearby in LA and not deal with all the BS they've been through in the last 7 years. I'm sure she likes Harry well enough and loves her grandkids, but it's not like Meghan was broke or struggling before Harry. She was on a successful TV show, making money, had a good and extensive group of friends.

I think in some ways Meghan got very unlucky in meeting Harry when she did, because she fell for him, they got married, and because of their age they immediately had kids, and now she's in the royal family in some capacity forever. I don't really think that's what Meghan's mom wanted for her, to be perfectly honest.

I loved their whole wedding but I thought her mother was particularly elegant.

She was and looked more more classy than Elizbeth and Camilla.

“Looked” classy rather than “is” classy. She deserted Meghan when she was 2 years old, returned when she was 9 and Meghan’s father was the custodial parent. Meghan had only a slight relationship with her mother until she needed at least one relative at the wedding. Meghan set her up in a dubious home health care business with no employees. It is similar to the business that Thomas Markel set up for her in which she paid no taxes. Markel bailed her out to avoid jail for her and this caused his bankruptcy.

Look a little more into Doria Ragland’s before you judge a book by its cover

Don’t try to play the race card. I am blacker than Meghan or her mother.

Good post. Thank you.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Was Lady Diana not a social climber? Why would a stunningly gorgeous woman with an inheritance marry a much older, balding, average looking and boring man who is already in love with a forbidden woman?

Of corse Diana was. I think both Kate and Diana are (were, respectively) social climbers.

Yes but then would you count Meghan and her mom as social climbers as well?

Meghan, yea. Her mom…why? She hasn’t really received any benefit from Meghan being royal and unlike the Middleton’s doesn’t have (had) the type of business that benefits from the association.

+1, this is one of those allegations that feels transparently racist. I think a lot of people saw a black woman as the MIB at a royal wedding and felt she was way above her station, thus the idea that she's social climbing. But I bet you anything she would have preferred Meghan marry some American or Canadian actor/celeb and settle nearby in LA and not deal with all the BS they've been through in the last 7 years. I'm sure she likes Harry well enough and loves her grandkids, but it's not like Meghan was broke or struggling before Harry. She was on a successful TV show, making money, had a good and extensive group of friends.

I think in some ways Meghan got very unlucky in meeting Harry when she did, because she fell for him, they got married, and because of their age they immediately had kids, and now she's in the royal family in some capacity forever. I don't really think that's what Meghan's mom wanted for her, to be perfectly honest.

I loved their whole wedding but I thought her mother was particularly elegant.

She was and looked more more classy than Elizbeth and Camilla.

“Looked” classy rather than “is” classy. She deserted Meghan when she was 2 years old, returned when she was 9 and Meghan’s father was the custodial parent. Meghan had only a slight relationship with her mother until she needed at least one relative at the wedding. Meghan set her up in a dubious home health care business with no employees. It is similar to the business that Thomas Markel set up for her in which she paid no taxes. Markel bailed her out to avoid jail for her and this caused his bankruptcy.

Look a little more into Doria Ragland’s before you judge a book by its cover

Don’t try to play the race card. I am blacker than Meghan or her mother.

Sources? If Thomas Markle has told the world Meghan had a hysterectomy, why wouldn’t he have spilled the tea on Doria too?