Meghan and Prince Harry are moving to the U.S./Canada - OFFICIAL

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ha! “Meghan Seen Without Wedding Ring” news headline from today — picture doesn’t lie

https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/10702119/meghan-markle-theatre-ring-prince-harry/

Really? Not a fan of hers, but I forget my wedding ring often, it happens. I truly can't believe Harry fell for her s t. Could never forgive myself if I came between my husband and his brother, it's a relationship I would never meddle in, for that I do blame Meghan. I'm sorry for Harry, he is too young to understand the far reaching damage this will cause in HIS family.

Meghan is calculating and would never, ever forget her wedding ring. She clearly showed off her hands for the paps. No ring.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ha! “Meghan Seen Without Wedding Ring” news headline from today — picture doesn’t lie

https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/10702119/meghan-markle-theatre-ring-prince-harry/

Really? Not a fan of hers, but I forget my wedding ring often, it happens. I truly can't believe Harry fell for her s t. Could never forgive myself if I came between my husband and his brother, it's a relationship I would never meddle in, for that I do blame Meghan. I'm sorry for Harry, he is too young to understand the far reaching damage this will cause in HIS family.

Meghan is calculating and would never, ever forget her wedding ring. She clearly showed off her hands for the paps. No ring.

Correct.

I predict she’ll unveil a new ring. Cruelty free diamond or some other trendy gem demonstrating how woke they are.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ha! “Meghan Seen Without Wedding Ring” news headline from today — picture doesn’t lie

https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/10702119/meghan-markle-theatre-ring-prince-harry/

Really? Not a fan of hers, but I forget my wedding ring often, it happens. I truly can't believe Harry fell for her s t. Could never forgive myself if I came between my husband and his brother, it's a relationship I would never meddle in, for that I do blame Meghan. I'm sorry for Harry, he is too young to understand the far reaching damage this will cause in HIS family.

Meghan is calculating and would never, ever forget her wedding ring. She clearly showed off her hands for the paps. No ring.

Or maybe she’s pregnant and her fingers were swollen? WTF is it to you? Harry has clearly and obviously chosen her every step of the way.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Shouldn’t Brits be upset with Harry for dumping them? I mean, he has been afforded every privilege since birth. The only reason he has a platform and the capacity to build his wealth is because of his Royal title. Yet, that’s not enough. He wants to jump ship, forego any responsibility, and build his own fortune. Again: why aren’t Brits furious?

Fine. Let him go. But kick him out of Frogmore or make him reimburse them for renovations and start paying rent.

I mean Charles has been very clear on wanting to streamline the monarchy for years. So Harry and MM would have gotten the boot eventually, likely once William is on the throne and his kids are older.

I suspect Charles would have provided for Harry to ensure he and his kids would be financially set for life regardless.

Harry is ditching the royals so he can amass an even bigger fortune with no questions asked. It’s a dick move; William is left to shoulder the duties and he won’t be able to build a celebrity fortune.

I hope Charles leaves the bulk of his estate to Will.

Harry has been ‘shouldering the burden’ since his early 20s with his military career, Invictus Foundation, and royal duties.

It’s time William stepped up and actually produced something. So if this is the kick in the pants he needed - by all means.

Prince William put in the most work, attending 150 engagements in the United Kingdom and 70 engagements on official, overseas tours.

Prince Harry trails William with 108 engagements in the U.K. and 85 overseas.

Google it.

But Harry shouldn’t be his competition as Harry will never be king. How does he compare to Charles?

William did more than Charles.

Umm no not ever. Charles has out worked William everyday of his life. When he was in his 30s he was doing 400+ engagements a year. He founded the Prince’s Trust in his 20s. He’s run the Duchy of Cornwall since he was 21.

William hasn’t even gotten close to 200 engagements in a single year at the age of 37. He’s founded nothing - zip-zero. He won’t even take over the Prince’s Trust.

He has 3 little children and the means to spend plenty of time with them. His father appears to have been more interested in becoming his mistress’s tampon.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I’m Canadian from Vancouver island where Harry and Meghan were holidaying. Canadians won’t bother them on the west coast. Toronto is gross so hopefully they choose BC.

Why is toronto gross?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ha! “Meghan Seen Without Wedding Ring” news headline from today — picture doesn’t lie

https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/10702119/meghan-markle-theatre-ring-prince-harry/

Really? Not a fan of hers, but I forget my wedding ring often, it happens. I truly can't believe Harry fell for her s t. Could never forgive myself if I came between my husband and his brother, it's a relationship I would never meddle in, for that I do blame Meghan. I'm sorry for Harry, he is too young to understand the far reaching damage this will cause in HIS family.

Meghan is calculating and would never, ever forget her wedding ring. She clearly showed off her hands for the paps. No ring.

Or maybe she’s pregnant and her fingers were swollen? WTF is it to you? Harry has clearly and obviously chosen her every step of the way.

Ha! No way she is pregnant. Divorce on the way!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Shouldn’t Brits be upset with Harry for dumping them? I mean, he has been afforded every privilege since birth. The only reason he has a platform and the capacity to build his wealth is because of his Royal title. Yet, that’s not enough. He wants to jump ship, forego any responsibility, and build his own fortune. Again: why aren’t Brits furious?

Fine. Let him go. But kick him out of Frogmore or make him reimburse them for renovations and start paying rent.

I mean Charles has been very clear on wanting to streamline the monarchy for years. So Harry and MM would have gotten the boot eventually, likely once William is on the throne and his kids are older.

I suspect Charles would have provided for Harry to ensure he and his kids would be financially set for life regardless.

Harry is ditching the royals so he can amass an even bigger fortune with no questions asked. It’s a dick move; William is left to shoulder the duties and he won’t be able to build a celebrity fortune.

I hope Charles leaves the bulk of his estate to Will.

Harry has been ‘shouldering the burden’ since his early 20s with his military career, Invictus Foundation, and royal duties.

It’s time William stepped up and actually produced something. So if this is the kick in the pants he needed - by all means.

Prince William put in the most work, attending 150 engagements in the United Kingdom and 70 engagements on official, overseas tours.

Prince Harry trails William with 108 engagements in the U.K. and 85 overseas.

Google it.

But Harry shouldn’t be his competition as Harry will never be king. How does he compare to Charles?

William did more than Charles.

Umm no not ever. Charles has out worked William everyday of his life. When he was in his 30s he was doing 400+ engagements a year. He founded the Prince’s Trust in his 20s. He’s run the Duchy of Cornwall since he was 21.

William hasn’t even gotten close to 200 engagements in a single year at the age of 37. He’s founded nothing - zip-zero. He won’t even take over the Prince’s Trust.

He has 3 little children and the means to spend plenty of time with them. His father appears to have been more interested in becoming his mistress’s tampon.

Right. He’s the only royal who’s ever had small children.

That’s aside from the rumors that he lives in Anmer Hall during the week while Kate takes care of the kiddies at Kensington Palace. (You never see him with them while shes always out at the nearby park with at least 2.)

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ha! “Meghan Seen Without Wedding Ring” news headline from today — picture doesn’t lie

https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/10702119/meghan-markle-theatre-ring-prince-harry/

Really? Not a fan of hers, but I forget my wedding ring often, it happens. I truly can't believe Harry fell for her s t. Could never forgive myself if I came between my husband and his brother, it's a relationship I would never meddle in, for that I do blame Meghan. I'm sorry for Harry, he is too young to understand the far reaching damage this will cause in HIS family.

Meghan is calculating and would never, ever forget her wedding ring. She clearly showed off her hands for the paps. No ring.

Or maybe she’s pregnant and her fingers were swollen? WTF is it to you? Harry has clearly and obviously chosen her every step of the way.

Ha! No way she is pregnant. Divorce on the way!

Yeah, a statement saying they’re leaving the royal family together is a great way to start divorce proceedings.

[Anonymous]

Meghan clearly showed off her hands in that photo. Who walks down stairs wit their hands on their front thighs like that? She’s signaling something. For someone who merches endlessly, this was no innocent “I forgot my rings.”

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Shouldn’t Brits be upset with Harry for dumping them? I mean, he has been afforded every privilege since birth. The only reason he has a platform and the capacity to build his wealth is because of his Royal title. Yet, that’s not enough. He wants to jump ship, forego any responsibility, and build his own fortune. Again: why aren’t Brits furious?

Fine. Let him go. But kick him out of Frogmore or make him reimburse them for renovations and start paying rent.

I mean Charles has been very clear on wanting to streamline the monarchy for years. So Harry and MM would have gotten the boot eventually, likely once William is on the throne and his kids are older.

I suspect Charles would have provided for Harry to ensure he and his kids would be financially set for life regardless.

Harry is ditching the royals so he can amass an even bigger fortune with no questions asked. It’s a dick move; William is left to shoulder the duties and he won’t be able to build a celebrity fortune.

I hope Charles leaves the bulk of his estate to Will.

Harry has been ‘shouldering the burden’ since his early 20s with his military career, Invictus Foundation, and royal duties.

It’s time William stepped up and actually produced something. So if this is the kick in the pants he needed - by all means.

Prince William put in the most work, attending 150 engagements in the United Kingdom and 70 engagements on official, overseas tours.

Prince Harry trails William with 108 engagements in the U.K. and 85 overseas.

Google it.

But Harry shouldn’t be his competition as Harry will never be king. How does he compare to Charles?

William did more than Charles.

Umm no not ever. Charles has out worked William everyday of his life. When he was in his 30s he was doing 400+ engagements a year. He founded the Prince’s Trust in his 20s. He’s run the Duchy of Cornwall since he was 21.

William hasn’t even gotten close to 200 engagements in a single year at the age of 37. He’s founded nothing - zip-zero. He won’t even take over the Prince’s Trust.

He has 3 little children and the means to spend plenty of time with them. His father appears to have been more interested in becoming his mistress’s tampon.

Right. He’s the only royal who’s ever had small children.

That’s aside from the rumors that he lives in Anmer Hall during the week while Kate takes care of the kiddies at Kensington Palace. (You never see him with them while shes always out at the nearby park with at least 2.)

It’s no secret that Elizabeth’s kids were mostly raised by nannies and Charles doesn’t seem to have been all that involved till Diana’s passing, so just having little kids doesn’t automatically confer parent-of-the-year status.

[Anonymous]

I still remember Harry saying his family would be the family Meghan never had (much to her own family’s dismay). She was welcomed with open arms. Charles even walked her down the aisle! It seems like she’s pulled him away from his family. Fine are the smiling photos of Harry, William and Kate laughing and joking.

I wonder if he knows that isolating himself and relying only on Meghan for support is not healthy. Not that he ever seemed particularly healthy ....

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They’ll be divorced in five years and he will go back to the family.

After popping out another kid or two.

At her age? Not happening.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Shouldn’t Brits be upset with Harry for dumping them? I mean, he has been afforded every privilege since birth. The only reason he has a platform and the capacity to build his wealth is because of his Royal title. Yet, that’s not enough. He wants to jump ship, forego any responsibility, and build his own fortune. Again: why aren’t Brits furious?

Fine. Let him go. But kick him out of Frogmore or make him reimburse them for renovations and start paying rent.

I mean Charles has been very clear on wanting to streamline the monarchy for years. So Harry and MM would have gotten the boot eventually, likely once William is on the throne and his kids are older.

I suspect Charles would have provided for Harry to ensure he and his kids would be financially set for life regardless.

Harry is ditching the royals so he can amass an even bigger fortune with no questions asked. It’s a dick move; William is left to shoulder the duties and he won’t be able to build a celebrity fortune.

I hope Charles leaves the bulk of his estate to Will.

Harry has been ‘shouldering the burden’ since his early 20s with his military career, Invictus Foundation, and royal duties.

It’s time William stepped up and actually produced something. So if this is the kick in the pants he needed - by all means.

Prince William put in the most work, attending 150 engagements in the United Kingdom and 70 engagements on official, overseas tours.

Prince Harry trails William with 108 engagements in the U.K. and 85 overseas.

Google it.

But Harry shouldn’t be his competition as Harry will never be king. How does he compare to Charles?

William did more than Charles.

Umm no not ever. Charles has out worked William everyday of his life. When he was in his 30s he was doing 400+ engagements a year. He founded the Prince’s Trust in his 20s. He’s run the Duchy of Cornwall since he was 21.

William hasn’t even gotten close to 200 engagements in a single year at the age of 37. He’s founded nothing - zip-zero. He won’t even take over the Prince’s Trust.

He has 3 little children and the means to spend plenty of time with them. His father appears to have been more interested in becoming his mistress’s tampon.

Right. He’s the only royal who’s ever had small children.

That’s aside from the rumors that he lives in Anmer Hall during the week while Kate takes care of the kiddies at Kensington Palace. (You never see him with them while shes always out at the nearby park with at least 2.)

It’s no secret that Elizabeth’s kids were mostly raised by nannies and Charles doesn’t seem to have been all that involved till Diana’s passing, so just having little kids doesn’t automatically confer parent-of-the-year status.

Okay but the point is if he’s not out there being Super Dad, wth is he doing with all his time?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I still remember Harry saying his family would be the family Meghan never had (much to her own family’s dismay). She was welcomed with open arms. Charles even walked her down the aisle! It seems like she’s pulled him away from his family. Fine are the smiling photos of Harry, William and Kate laughing and joking.

I wonder if he knows that isolating himself and relying only on Meghan for support is not healthy. Not that he ever seemed particularly healthy ....

That’s what narcs do. Meghan is a narc.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They’ll be divorced in five years and he will go back to the family.

After popping out another kid or two.

At her age? Not happening.

The Queen had Edward at the same age...