Meghan and Prince Harry are moving to the U.S./Canada - OFFICIAL

[Anonymous]

https://blindgossip.com/wtf-branding/#more-10019

Funny

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Looks like their “royal” titles will go away after March 31, but they’ll reassess in a year.
https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-51565325

This is a direct quote from the article you posted:

The couple will formally retain their HRH titles

Maybe read the article next time?

N

That only means that the Queen isn’t (yet) formally stripping them of the HRH. She would need to issue letters patent to do so. My speculation is that she expects Harry to come back to the fold (Meghan too maybe, but I peg the likelihood at near zero) with tail tucked between his legs. It would look silly to formally strip him of the HRH then give it back. Hence the statement about revisiting the arrangement in a year. I also
think that what that really means is that if H and M make such fools of themselves, then the Queen will formally strip them.

On the other hand, they are not allowed to call themselves royal, they are “required” to step back from all of the royal duties, lose all the royal patronages etc. Most importantly to them - they can’t brand themselves as ‘Sussex Royal’. What matters is what happens in practice.

Except they've already made $1 million in cash and its only been a month since they left. Why in the world would this happen? I can easily see them bringing in $20 million in contracts this year alone. The Bon Jovi song by itself is worth millions.

Isn't the song meant for the foundation though?

Yes the money will benefit Invictus and Bon Jovi, not these two jokes. Also, assuming they made money from that JP Morgan talk, they are technically still royals right now and I’m guessing that’s how they got the fee. And 2, I’m sure that’s a violation of their agreement and the family can’t be happy. As time passes, there will be less interest in them. No doubt they will me able to make some money, but not nearly enough to afford them the lifestyle they have now.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don’t tolerate phonies so that’s my reason.

Why do you think she's a fake? Honestly curious.

have you not been paying attention?

The private jet fiasco for one and their massive massive carbon footprint, while claiming to be environmentalists.

Pretending to care about the plight of some of the poorest people in the world, and even tearing up on camera for the documentary that was meant to highlight such suffering. But whoops they are tearing up about their own plight.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Looks like their “royal” titles will go away after March 31, but they’ll reassess in a year.
https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-51565325

This is a direct quote from the article you posted:

The couple will formally retain their HRH titles

Maybe read the article next time?

N

That only means that the Queen isn’t (yet) formally stripping them of the HRH. She would need to issue letters patent to do so. My speculation is that she expects Harry to come back to the fold (Meghan too maybe, but I peg the likelihood at near zero) with tail tucked between his legs. It would look silly to formally strip him of the HRH then give it back. Hence the statement about revisiting the arrangement in a year. I also
think that what that really means is that if H and M make such fools of themselves, then the Queen will formally strip them.

On the other hand, they are not allowed to call themselves royal, they are “required” to step back from all of the royal duties, lose all the royal patronages etc. Most importantly to them - they can’t brand themselves as ‘Sussex Royal’. What matters is what happens in practice.

Except they've already made $1 million in cash and its only been a month since they left. Why in the world would this happen? I can easily see them bringing in $20 million in contracts this year alone. The Bon Jovi song by itself is worth millions.

Isn't the song meant for the foundation though?

Yes the money will benefit Invictus and Bon Jovi, not these two jokes. Also, assuming they made money from that JP Morgan talk, they are technically still royals right now and I’m guessing that’s how they got the fee. And 2, I’m sure that’s a violation of their agreement and the family can’t be happy. As time passes, there will be less interest in them. No doubt they will me able to make some money, but not nearly enough to afford them the lifestyle they have now.

This is the same thing commenters said before their wedding. 2 year anniversary date coming up in 3 months and if anything its grown stronger. So don't count your chickens before they hatch.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don’t tolerate phonies so that’s my reason.

Why do you think she's a fake? Honestly curious.

have you not been paying attention?

The private jet fiasco for one and their massive massive carbon footprint, while claiming to be environmentalists.

Pretending to care about the plight of some of the poorest people in the world, and even tearing up on camera for the documentary that was meant to highlight such suffering. But whoops they are tearing up about their own plight.

Not to mention all the hate on Meghan’s dad for cashing in on his connections, when they are also cashing in using Diana’s memory. (That JP Morgan talk.)

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Looks like their “royal” titles will go away after March 31, but they’ll reassess in a year.
https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-51565325

This is a direct quote from the article you posted:

The couple will formally retain their HRH titles

Maybe read the article next time?

N

That only means that the Queen isn’t (yet) formally stripping them of the HRH. She would need to issue letters patent to do so. My speculation is that she expects Harry to come back to the fold (Meghan too maybe, but I peg the likelihood at near zero) with tail tucked between his legs. It would look silly to formally strip him of the HRH then give it back. Hence the statement about revisiting the arrangement in a year. I also
think that what that really means is that if H and M make such fools of themselves, then the Queen will formally strip them.

On the other hand, they are not allowed to call themselves royal, they are “required” to step back from all of the royal duties, lose all the royal patronages etc. Most importantly to them - they can’t brand themselves as ‘Sussex Royal’. What matters is what happens in practice.

Except they've already made $1 million in cash and its only been a month since they left. Why in the world would this happen? I can easily see them bringing in $20 million in contracts this year alone. The Bon Jovi song by itself is worth millions.

Isn't the song meant for the foundation though?

Yes the money will benefit Invictus and Bon Jovi, not these two jokes. Also, assuming they made money from that JP Morgan talk, they are technically still royals right now and I’m guessing that’s how they got the fee. And 2, I’m sure that’s a violation of their agreement and the family can’t be happy. As time passes, there will be less interest in them. No doubt they will me able to make some money, but not nearly enough to afford them the lifestyle they have now.

This is the same thing commenters said before their wedding. 2 year anniversary date coming up in 3 months and if anything its grown stronger. So don't count your chickens before they hatch.

The public interest in watching a train wreck won’t pay their bills. The tabloids will make this money, not them.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:
This is the same thing commenters said before their wedding. 2 year anniversary date coming up in 3 months and if anything its grown stronger. So don't count your chickens before they hatch.

Look at the comments on any of their Instagram photos. They are being publicly pilloried.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Looks like their “royal” titles will go away after March 31, but they’ll reassess in a year.
https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-51565325

This is a direct quote from the article you posted:

The couple will formally retain their HRH titles

Maybe read the article next time?

N

That only means that the Queen isn’t (yet) formally stripping them of the HRH. She would need to issue letters patent to do so. My speculation is that she expects Harry to come back to the fold (Meghan too maybe, but I peg the likelihood at near zero) with tail tucked between his legs. It would look silly to formally strip him of the HRH then give it back. Hence the statement about revisiting the arrangement in a year. I also
think that what that really means is that if H and M make such fools of themselves, then the Queen will formally strip them.

On the other hand, they are not allowed to call themselves royal, they are “required” to step back from all of the royal duties, lose all the royal patronages etc. Most importantly to them - they can’t brand themselves as ‘Sussex Royal’. What matters is what happens in practice.

Except they've already made $1 million in cash and its only been a month since they left. Why in the world would this happen? I can easily see them bringing in $20 million in contracts this year alone. The Bon Jovi song by itself is worth millions.

Isn't the song meant for the foundation though?

Yes the money will benefit Invictus and Bon Jovi, not these two jokes. Also, assuming they made money from that JP Morgan talk, they are technically still royals right now and I’m guessing that’s how they got the fee. And 2, I’m sure that’s a violation of their agreement and the family can’t be happy. As time passes, there will be less interest in them. No doubt they will me able to make some money, but not nearly enough to afford them the lifestyle they have now.

This is the same thing commenters said before their wedding. 2 year anniversary date coming up in 3 months and if anything its grown stronger. So don't count your chickens before they hatch.

They need the good kind of interest to make money. This is what people are talking about.

[Anonymous]

In the beginning, I was a fan. I thought she was kind, beautiful, smart. But OMG, the underhanded moves against the queen and trying to cash in while claiming to desire "privacy" It's the ultimate in hypocrisy. I will never see her the same again.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Looks like their “royal” titles will go away after March 31, but they’ll reassess in a year.
https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-51565325

This is a direct quote from the article you posted:

The couple will formally retain their HRH titles

Maybe read the article next time?

N

That only means that the Queen isn’t (yet) formally stripping them of the HRH. She would need to issue letters patent to do so. My speculation is that she expects Harry to come back to the fold (Meghan too maybe, but I peg the likelihood at near zero) with tail tucked between his legs. It would look silly to formally strip him of the HRH then give it back. Hence the statement about revisiting the arrangement in a year. I also
think that what that really means is that if H and M make such fools of themselves, then the Queen will formally strip them.

On the other hand, they are not allowed to call themselves royal, they are “required” to step back from all of the royal duties, lose all the royal patronages etc. Most importantly to them - they can’t brand themselves as ‘Sussex Royal’. What matters is what happens in practice.

Except they've already made $1 million in cash and its only been a month since they left. Why in the world would this happen? I can easily see them bringing in $20 million in contracts this year alone. The Bon Jovi song by itself is worth millions.

Isn't the song meant for the foundation though?

Yes the money will benefit Invictus and Bon Jovi, not these two jokes. Also, assuming they made money from that JP Morgan talk, they are technically still royals right now and I’m guessing that’s how they got the fee. And 2, I’m sure that’s a violation of their agreement and the family can’t be happy. As time passes, there will be less interest in them. No doubt they will me able to make some money, but not nearly enough to afford them the lifestyle they have now.

This is the same thing commenters said before their wedding. 2 year anniversary date coming up in 3 months and if anything its grown stronger. So don't count your chickens before they hatch.

They need the good kind of interest to make money. This is what people are talking about.

You mean the 'good' kind of interest that had JP Morgan paying them $1 million for a single speech? Or Goldman Sachs partnering with Prince Harry.

Look I get that it rubs your chubs that they can and do make money easily but if we're talking about 'bad' kind of interest, the publicity they had post-South Africa was the worst. Guess what?

Six months later they've secured a $14 million mansion rental, made $1 million unattached to royal coffers, and have more offers than they possibly know what to deal with.

[Anonymous]

A 14 million mansion RENTAL does not impress, pp.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:In the beginning, I was a fan. I thought she was kind, beautiful, smart. But OMG, the underhanded moves against the queen and trying to cash in while claiming to desire "privacy" It's the ultimate in hypocrisy. I will never see her the same again.

+1. Couldn’t have said it better myself.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:A 14 million mansion RENTAL does not impress, pp.

Doesn't impress me either. But getting it for FREE from a friend? That takes some serious networking and people skills.

H+M are clearly not worried about having to leave anytime soon either.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don’t tolerate phonies so that’s my reason.

Why do you think she's a fake? Honestly curious.

Not the PP, but I thinks she's a fake. Decided she was full of $hit when i saw an early interview in which she talked about having no idea who Harry was when she first was set up to meet him. Not that she didn't know who her blind date was to be, but that she didn't know Harry was Prince Harry. GMAF break--she's wanted to be famous, rich, and be an actress, and she doesn't know the British Royal Family?

[Anonymous]

Say Sussex five times. Not the best brand name.