Meghan and Prince Harry are moving to the U.S./Canada - OFFICIAL

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I hope all the MM defenders who claimed she was more hardworking than Kate are eating crow now. MM obviously couldn’t handle the royal duties. She just wants the wealthy celebrity lifestyle without the work.

Meghan did more in two-and-a-half years than Kate has done in 18.

I think half the problem is the royals asked Meghan to STOP working so hard. She needs to be productive and will all the 2020 launches they have scheduled, unfettered by firm rules, the BRF is looking more archaic by the day.

Not true. You can google the # of events each did, and Kate did more.

In 2019...when Meghan gave birth and had a freaking four-month maternity leave.

Kate SHOULD have been doing more. It would be a disgrace if she hadn’t.

Umm no lol. You’re mistaken. Kate did less than 80 engagements total in 2018 because that was the year she gave birth to Louis and took off six months.
That was the 2018 tally.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:More than a decade ago, I watched an interview with Harry in which he either outright said or hinted that he may eventually leave the BRF and wistfully said his dream job was to be a safari guide in Africa.

I also was in the military at the same time as him and recall when the British press leaked that he was serving in combat and he had to return home immediately. He was said to be devastated and I recall everyone being stunned that the British press would do that to their own prince. He was just a young guy at the time and really in his element in the military. He even dated some US military girls. That got taken from him, along with his mom, his innocence when he was made to walk with his mother's casket on display for media consumption, etc. Nothing is sacred. And now he's got a young son to worry about. Why should he trust them with Archie?

Harry is sovereign over himself, his future, his conscience. As Americans we should all recognize that our country broke away from England because of its stifling lack of freedom. Here, Harry can be himself and make something of himself that wasn't ordained by him by tradition. It doesn't get more American than what Harry just did. He will fit in well and be a great addition to our country.

Umm isn’t he going to Canada and not the US?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I hope all the MM defenders who claimed she was more hardworking than Kate are eating crow now. MM obviously couldn’t handle the royal duties. She just wants the wealthy celebrity lifestyle without the work.

Meghan did more in two-and-a-half years than Kate has done in 18.

I think half the problem is the royals asked Meghan to STOP working so hard. She needs to be productive and will all the 2020 launches they have scheduled, unfettered by firm rules, the BRF is looking more archaic by the day.

Not true. You can google the # of events each did, and Kate did more.

In 2019...when Meghan gave birth and had a freaking four-month maternity leave.

Kate SHOULD have been doing more. It would be a disgrace if she hadn’t.

That was the 2018 tally.

Meghan didn’t marry into the family until May of that year. Of course she would have fewer engagements.

She actually had MORE engagements even though she was planning a wedding and pregnant. 126 to Kate’s 77 in 2018. Kate gave birth to Louis that year and took six months off.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Shouldn’t Brits be upset with Harry for dumping them? I mean, he has been afforded every privilege since birth. The only reason he has a platform and the capacity to build his wealth is because of his Royal title. Yet, that’s not enough. He wants to jump ship, forego any responsibility, and build his own fortune. Again: why aren’t Brits furious?

Fine. Let him go. But kick him out of Frogmore or make him reimburse them for renovations and start paying rent.

I mean Charles has been very clear on wanting to streamline the monarchy for years. So Harry and MM would have gotten the boot eventually, likely once William is on the throne and his kids are older.

I suspect Charles would have provided for Harry to ensure he and his kids would be financially set for life regardless.

Harry is ditching the royals so he can amass an even bigger fortune with no questions asked. It’s a dick move; William is left to shoulder the duties and he won’t be able to build a celebrity fortune.

I hope Charles leaves the bulk of his estate to Will.

Harry has been ‘shouldering the burden’ since his early 20s with his military career, Invictus Foundation, and royal duties.

It’s time William stepped up and actually produced something. So if this is the kick in the pants he needed - by all means.

Prince William put in the most work, attending 150 engagements in the United Kingdom and 70 engagements on official, overseas tours.

Prince Harry trails William with 108 engagements in the U.K. and 85 overseas.

Google it.

But Harry shouldn’t be his competition as Harry will never be king. How does he compare to Charles?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Lovely how the discussion always circles back to William and Kate. Meghan and her fans are obsessed with destroying them. It’s not a good look! Your insecurities are showing because Kate and William are beloved and truly respected by the Commonwealth.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:More than a decade ago, I watched an interview with Harry in which he either outright said or hinted that he may eventually leave the BRF and wistfully said his dream job was to be a safari guide in Africa.

I also was in the military at the same time as him and recall when the British press leaked that he was serving in combat and he had to return home immediately. He was said to be devastated and I recall everyone being stunned that the British press would do that to their own prince. He was just a young guy at the time and really in his element in the military. He even dated some US military girls. That got taken from him, along with his mom, his innocence when he was made to walk with his mother's casket on display for media consumption, etc. Nothing is sacred. And now he's got a young son to worry about. Why should he trust them with Archie?

Harry is sovereign over himself, his future, his conscience. As Americans we should all recognize that our country broke away from England because of its stifling lack of freedom. Here, Harry can be himself and make something of himself that wasn't ordained by him by tradition. It doesn't get more American than what Harry just did. He will fit in well and be a great addition to our country.

Umm isn’t he going to Canada and not the US?

It’s not decided. Pretty sure they’ll spend adequate time in the States though.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Shouldn’t Brits be upset with Harry for dumping them? I mean, he has been afforded every privilege since birth. The only reason he has a platform and the capacity to build his wealth is because of his Royal title. Yet, that’s not enough. He wants to jump ship, forego any responsibility, and build his own fortune. Again: why aren’t Brits furious?

Fine. Let him go. But kick him out of Frogmore or make him reimburse them for renovations and start paying rent.

I mean Charles has been very clear on wanting to streamline the monarchy for years. So Harry and MM would have gotten the boot eventually, likely once William is on the throne and his kids are older.

I suspect Charles would have provided for Harry to ensure he and his kids would be financially set for life regardless.

Harry is ditching the royals so he can amass an even bigger fortune with no questions asked. It’s a dick move; William is left to shoulder the duties and he won’t be able to build a celebrity fortune.

I hope Charles leaves the bulk of his estate to Will.

Harry has been ‘shouldering the burden’ since his early 20s with his military career, Invictus Foundation, and royal duties.

It’s time William stepped up and actually produced something. So if this is the kick in the pants he needed - by all means.

Prince William put in the most work, attending 150 engagements in the United Kingdom and 70 engagements on official, overseas tours.

Prince Harry trails William with 108 engagements in the U.K. and 85 overseas.

Google it.

But Harry shouldn’t be his competition as Harry will never be king. How does he compare to Charles?

William did more than Charles.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Lovely how the discussion always circles back to William and Kate. Meghan and her fans are obsessed with destroying them. It’s not a good look! Your insecurities are showing because Kate and William are beloved and truly respected by the Commonwealth.

Eyeroll=non-answer. Truth hurts.

[Anonymous]

Ha! “Meghan Seen Without Wedding Ring” news headline from today — picture doesn’t lie

https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/10702119/meghan-markle-theatre-ring-prince-harry/

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Ha! “Meghan Seen Without Wedding Ring” news headline from today — picture doesn’t lie

https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/10702119/meghan-markle-theatre-ring-prince-harry/

She’s trading up for a bigger one like Beyoncé.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ha! “Meghan Seen Without Wedding Ring” news headline from today — picture doesn’t lie

https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/10702119/meghan-markle-theatre-ring-prince-harry/

She’s trading up for a bigger one like Beyoncé.

Please. Harry doesn’t have access to that kind of money. Unless she’s going to buy her own fake cubic zirconia.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ha! “Meghan Seen Without Wedding Ring” news headline from today — picture doesn’t lie

https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/10702119/meghan-markle-theatre-ring-prince-harry/

She’s trading up for a bigger one like Beyoncé.

You mean trading Harry in like she did Trevor and Corey for better models?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Ha! “Meghan Seen Without Wedding Ring” news headline from today — picture doesn’t lie

https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/10702119/meghan-markle-theatre-ring-prince-harry/

Really? Not a fan of hers, but I forget my wedding ring often, it happens. I truly can't believe Harry fell for her s t. Could never forgive myself if I came between my husband and his brother, it's a relationship I would never meddle in, for that I do blame Meghan. I'm sorry for Harry, he is too young to understand the far reaching damage this will cause in HIS family.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Shouldn’t Brits be upset with Harry for dumping them? I mean, he has been afforded every privilege since birth. The only reason he has a platform and the capacity to build his wealth is because of his Royal title. Yet, that’s not enough. He wants to jump ship, forego any responsibility, and build his own fortune. Again: why aren’t Brits furious?

Fine. Let him go. But kick him out of Frogmore or make him reimburse them for renovations and start paying rent.

I mean Charles has been very clear on wanting to streamline the monarchy for years. So Harry and MM would have gotten the boot eventually, likely once William is on the throne and his kids are older.

I suspect Charles would have provided for Harry to ensure he and his kids would be financially set for life regardless.

Harry is ditching the royals so he can amass an even bigger fortune with no questions asked. It’s a dick move; William is left to shoulder the duties and he won’t be able to build a celebrity fortune.

I hope Charles leaves the bulk of his estate to Will.

Harry has been ‘shouldering the burden’ since his early 20s with his military career, Invictus Foundation, and royal duties.

It’s time William stepped up and actually produced something. So if this is the kick in the pants he needed - by all means.

Prince William put in the most work, attending 150 engagements in the United Kingdom and 70 engagements on official, overseas tours.

Prince Harry trails William with 108 engagements in the U.K. and 85 overseas.

Google it.

But Harry shouldn’t be his competition as Harry will never be king. How does he compare to Charles?

William did more than Charles.

Umm no not ever. Charles has out worked William everyday of his life. When he was in his 30s he was doing 400+ engagements a year. He founded the Prince’s Trust in his 20s. He’s run the Duchy of Cornwall since he was 21.

William hasn’t even gotten close to 200 engagements in a single year at the age of 37. He’s founded nothing - zip-zero. He won’t even take over the Prince’s Trust.

[Anonymous]

Sorry - 300 engagements.