Roger Stone's Time in the Barrel

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Mueller Report, in plain sight

https://twitter.com/jentaub/status/1089193853230505984

So it was leaked?

She means if you read the individual indictments it tells the story. Mueller put a lot of detail in the indictments in case his final report is withheld from the public.

Last Wednesday and Thursday the Special Grand Jury returned 12 sealed indictments. Stone was only served with 7. I wonder who gets the other 5 or are they with holding them from Stone to get him to flip?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why isn’t Stone still in prison?

White privilege. Pay a bond and walk out. Unlike the poor kid who cannot afford $500 bond and then ends up dying in jail over a dime bag.

Why is the bond so low if the crime was so high?

Trump has been trying to stack the courts.

Ah. I see. So what we have are corrupt Trump-appointed judges and white privilege allowing Stone to get a low bond for colluding with Russia and committing treason?

Isn’t that why he wanted to stack the courts and fill SCOTUS vacancies?

I'm kind of stuck on the fact that you are so married to the treason narrative that you think lying to Congress is the same thing. Do you know how easy it is to be charged with lying to Congress or the FBI?

They lied to cover up the treason.

I see. It's all coming together now, right?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why isn’t Stone still in prison?

White privilege. Pay a bond and walk out. Unlike the poor kid who cannot afford $500 bond and then ends up dying in jail over a dime bag.

Why is the bond so low if the crime was so high?

Trump has been trying to stack the courts.

Ah. I see. So what we have are corrupt Trump-appointed judges and white privilege allowing Stone to get a low bond for colluding with Russia and committing treason?

Isn’t that why he wanted to stack the courts and fill SCOTUS vacancies?

I'm kind of stuck on the fact that you are so married to the treason narrative that you think lying to Congress is the same thing. Do you know how easy it is to be charged with lying to Congress or the FBI?

Do you know why they all keep lying about all the same stuff?

Do I know why all that's happening is charges re: lying to Congress and nothing substantiative? Do I know why CNN got an exclusive (hint: not because they are really clever reporters). Do I know liberals don't seem to care that Dems have lied to congress too (Huma, I'm looking at you) and nothing happens to them? So yeah, forgive me that I don't put any faith in anything Mueller's team does or says.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why isn’t Stone still in prison?

White privilege. Pay a bond and walk out. Unlike the poor kid who cannot afford $500 bond and then ends up dying in jail over a dime bag.

Why is the bond so low if the crime was so high?

Trump has been trying to stack the courts.

Ah. I see. So what we have are corrupt Trump-appointed judges and white privilege allowing Stone to get a low bond for colluding with Russia and committing treason?

Isn’t that why he wanted to stack the courts and fill SCOTUS vacancies?

I'm kind of stuck on the fact that you are so married to the treason narrative that you think lying to Congress is the same thing. Do you know how easy it is to be charged with lying to Congress or the FBI?

Do you know why they all keep lying about all the same stuff?

Do I know why all that's happening is charges re: lying to Congress and nothing substantiative? Do I know why CNN got an exclusive (hint: not because they are really clever reporters). Do I know liberals don't seem to care that Dems have lied to congress too (Huma, I'm looking at you) and nothing happens to them? So yeah, forgive me that I don't put any faith in anything Mueller's team does or says.

Up until now, there haven't been any consequences for lying to Congress for anyone. Anyone.

Reading the various indictments, I'm not upset by the charges of lying, since there was so much else going on too. But you do you.

[Anonymous]

In Corsi's book, he said records show he and Roger talked 3 times on Access Hollywood tape day. And that Stone told him tape was coming and asked him to tell Assange to get Podesta leaks ready.

No Collusion. Maybe Corsi told the truth on this and the phone logs would confirm, but if Stone lied about it, then that is clear cut perjury.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why isn’t Stone still in prison?

White privilege. Pay a bond and walk out. Unlike the poor kid who cannot afford $500 bond and then ends up dying in jail over a dime bag.

Why is the bond so low if the crime was so high?

Trump has been trying to stack the courts.

Ah. I see. So what we have are corrupt Trump-appointed judges and white privilege allowing Stone to get a low bond for colluding with Russia and committing treason?

Isn’t that why he wanted to stack the courts and fill SCOTUS vacancies?

I'm kind of stuck on the fact that you are so married to the treason narrative that you think lying to Congress is the same thing. Do you know how easy it is to be charged with lying to Congress or the FBI?

[DP] When someone admits to lying, what does it mean? Example: Liar to Congress: "The light was not red when I crossed the intersection." Later: I admit that I lied to Congress when I made that statement." Liar is sentenced for the crime of lying to Congress.

So, what do we know from that exchange? We know the individual admits to running a red light, but hasn't been charged with that crime yet (to our knowledge).

So now go back and read what all the admitted lies were in this matter and write out for yourself what the opposite of each of those false statements is -- that will begin to tell you the story of where this is going.

[Anonymous]

And again, would we treat all who lie to Congress equally or not?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:And again, would we treat all who lie to Congress equally or not?

You well know that all are not treated equally in any courtroom.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And again, would we treat all who lie to Congress equally or not?

You well know that all are not treated equally in any courtroom.

But you still celebrate that?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:And again, would we treat all who lie to Congress equally or not?

So you are happy to give a pass to people who lied to cover up treason. They lied because they didn't want to admit their treasonous acts.

Get it?

And whatboutismfail with Huma. The GOP had two years to bring Huma before a committee and they didn't. Ask yourself why?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And again, would we treat all who lie to Congress equally or not?

So you are happy to give a pass to people who lied to cover up treason. They lied because they didn't want to admit their treasonous acts.

Get it?

And whatboutismfail with Huma. The GOP had two years to bring Huma before a committee and they didn't. Ask yourself why?

I asked if you believe I equal treatment under the law. Clearly you do not. So you are just as corrupt

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And again, would we treat all who lie to Congress equally or not?

So you are happy to give a pass to people who lied to cover up treason. They lied because they didn't want to admit their treasonous acts.

Get it?

And whatboutismfail with Huma. The GOP had two years to bring Huma before a committee and they didn't. Ask yourself why?

I asked if you believe I equal treatment under the law. Clearly you do not. So you are just as corrupt

DP. Nope.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And again, would we treat all who lie to Congress equally or not?

So you are happy to give a pass to people who lied to cover up treason. They lied because they didn't want to admit their treasonous acts.

Get it?

And whatboutismfail with Huma. The GOP had two years to bring Huma before a committee and they didn't. Ask yourself why?

I asked if you believe I equal treatment under the law. Clearly you do not. So you are just as corrupt

Logic fail.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And again, would we treat all who lie to Congress equally or not?

So you are happy to give a pass to people who lied to cover up treason. They lied because they didn't want to admit their treasonous acts.

Get it?

And whatboutismfail with Huma. The GOP had two years to bring Huma before a committee and they didn't. Ask yourself why?

I asked if you believe I equal treatment under the law. Clearly you do not. So you are just as corrupt

Logic fail.

Abidin and mills lied. Not disputed. Same treatment?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And again, would we treat all who lie to Congress equally or not?

So you are happy to give a pass to people who lied to cover up treason. They lied because they didn't want to admit their treasonous acts.

Get it?

And whatboutismfail with Huma. The GOP had two years to bring Huma before a committee and they didn't. Ask yourself why?

I asked if you believe I equal treatment under the law. Clearly you do not. So you are just as corrupt

DP. Nope.

https://www.chicagotribune.com/news/opinion/commentary/ct-perspec-hanson-mueller-mccabe-hillary-clinton-donald-trump-james-comey-huma-abedin-investigation-0430-story.html

What of this?