Roger Stone's Time in the Barrel

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why isn’t Stone still in prison?

White privilege. Pay a bond and walk out. Unlike the poor kid who cannot afford $500 bond and then ends up dying in jail over a dime bag.

Why is the bond so low if the crime was so high?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Rubio is certainly suggesting that knowingly working with Wikileaks is a crime.

Good to know. So was the WaPo - https://www.thepostemail.com/2018/11/28/wikileaks-the-washington-post-communicated-with-wikileaks-trump-campaign-russian-state/

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why isn’t Stone still in prison?

White privilege. Pay a bond and walk out. Unlike the poor kid who cannot afford $500 bond and then ends up dying in jail over a dime bag.

Why is the bond so low if the crime was so high?

Trump has been trying to stack the courts.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why isn’t Stone still in prison?

White privilege. Pay a bond and walk out. Unlike the poor kid who cannot afford $500 bond and then ends up dying in jail over a dime bag.

Why is the bond so low if the crime was so high?

Trump has been trying to stack the courts.

Ah. I see. So what we have are corrupt Trump-appointed judges and white privilege allowing Stone to get a low bond for colluding with Russia and committing treason?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why isn’t Stone still in prison?

White privilege. Pay a bond and walk out. Unlike the poor kid who cannot afford $500 bond and then ends up dying in jail over a dime bag.

Why is the bond so low if the crime was so high?

Trump has been trying to stack the courts.

Ah. I see. So what we have are corrupt Trump-appointed judges and white privilege allowing Stone to get a low bond for colluding with Russia and committing treason?

Isn’t that why he wanted to stack the courts and fill SCOTUS vacancies?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why isn’t Stone still in prison?

White privilege. Pay a bond and walk out. Unlike the poor kid who cannot afford $500 bond and then ends up dying in jail over a dime bag.

Why is the bond so low if the crime was so high?

Trump has been trying to stack the courts.

Ah. I see. So what we have are corrupt Trump-appointed judges and white privilege allowing Stone to get a low bond for colluding with Russia and committing treason?

Isn’t that why he wanted to stack the courts and fill SCOTUS vacancies?

I'm kind of stuck on the fact that you are so married to the treason narrative that you think lying to Congress is the same thing. Do you know how easy it is to be charged with lying to Congress or the FBI?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why isn’t Stone still in prison?

White privilege. Pay a bond and walk out. Unlike the poor kid who cannot afford $500 bond and then ends up dying in jail over a dime bag.

Why is the bond so low if the crime was so high?

Trump has been trying to stack the courts.

Ah. I see. So what we have are corrupt Trump-appointed judges and white privilege allowing Stone to get a low bond for colluding with Russia and committing treason?

Isn’t that why he wanted to stack the courts and fill SCOTUS vacancies?

I'm kind of stuck on the fact that you are so married to the treason narrative that you think lying to Congress is the same thing. Do you know how easy it is to be charged with lying to Congress or the FBI?

They lied to cover up the treason.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why isn’t Stone still in prison?

White privilege. Pay a bond and walk out. Unlike the poor kid who cannot afford $500 bond and then ends up dying in jail over a dime bag.

Why is the bond so low if the crime was so high?

Trump has been trying to stack the courts.

Ah. I see. So what we have are corrupt Trump-appointed judges and white privilege allowing Stone to get a low bond for colluding with Russia and committing treason?

Isn’t that why he wanted to stack the courts and fill SCOTUS vacancies?

I'm kind of stuck on the fact that you are so married to the treason narrative that you think lying to Congress is the same thing. Do you know how easy it is to be charged with lying to Congress or the FBI?

I am still waiting to hear the facts before I am convinced of treason or not. But it’s clear that there is widespread corruption and illegal activity (emoluments, etc). And it’s clear that Trump and the GOP want the courts stacked in their favor.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why isn’t Stone still in prison?

White privilege. Pay a bond and walk out. Unlike the poor kid who cannot afford $500 bond and then ends up dying in jail over a dime bag.

Why is the bond so low if the crime was so high?

Trump has been trying to stack the courts.

Ah. I see. So what we have are corrupt Trump-appointed judges and white privilege allowing Stone to get a low bond for colluding with Russia and committing treason?

Isn’t that why he wanted to stack the courts and fill SCOTUS vacancies?

I'm kind of stuck on the fact that you are so married to the treason narrative that you think lying to Congress is the same thing. Do you know how easy it is to be charged with lying to Congress or the FBI?

Do you know why they all keep lying about all the same stuff?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:OK. If there is evidence he should be charged. Fair enough. But please tell me -- Why get him at 6 am, why put a chain around his waist in addition to handcuffs, why take him out in his pajamas without giving him a chance to change clothes? I feel like calling the FBI to complain.

And CNN's camera is rolling ...

This is how Soviet Union or North Korea deal with their political dissidents. Shameful.

I agree. He is such a dangerous criminal that he was released with a $250,000 signature bond - meaning he had to pay no money.
I thought liberals did not like the militarization of police. I guess it's ok when it is a 66 YO white man who is no flight risk and doesn't own a handgun.

We don't like, but why do you only complain if it's a white man? And what's with the specious comparisons to the Soviet Union or North Korea? When people are arrested in those places, you never see them again. I heard Stone is going on TV tonight. Can you name a time that happened in the history of the Soviet Union or North Korea?

Not to mention, but Trump supporters now love Russia and have no problem with letting Putin run our country. While all the phony concern about one of their tactics?

There is help available for seriously delusional people like you.

DP, what was posted that was false?

https://thehill.com/opinion/white-house/397672-trump-effect-republican-support-for-russia-has-doubled

Pretty universal polling among the GOP has a favorability rating for Putin higher than other Americans.

There's absolutely nothing there about "letting Putin run our country". That idea is delusional!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Mueller Report, in plain sight

https://twitter.com/jentaub/status/1089193853230505984

So it was leaked?

I think not! This is obviously another grifter taking known events to their extremes and re-selling it to the public. What are these people going to do when the actual report is released? Especially if it's a big letdown?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Mueller Report, in plain sight

https://twitter.com/jentaub/status/1089193853230505984

So it was leaked?

I think not! This is obviously another grifter taking known events to their extremes and re-selling it to the public. What are these people going to do when the actual report is released? Especially if it's a big letdown?

Did you read the linked thread? That's not what it is.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why isn’t Stone still in prison?

White privilege. Pay a bond and walk out. Unlike the poor kid who cannot afford $500 bond and then ends up dying in jail over a dime bag.

Why is the bond so low if the crime was so high?

Trump has been trying to stack the courts.

Ah. I see. So what we have are corrupt Trump-appointed judges and white privilege allowing Stone to get a low bond for colluding with Russia and committing treason?

Isn’t that why he wanted to stack the courts and fill SCOTUS vacancies?

I'm kind of stuck on the fact that you are so married to the treason narrative that you think lying to Congress is the same thing. Do you know how easy it is to be charged with lying to Congress or the FBI?

If you don't want a speeding ticket, don't speed.
If you don't want a perjury charge, don't lie.

They don't charge for immaterial omissions or vagaries. Read the indictments, these are willful and material lies.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Mueller Report, in plain sight

https://twitter.com/jentaub/status/1089193853230505984

So it was leaked?

I think not! This is obviously another grifter taking known events to their extremes and re-selling it to the public. What are these people going to do when the actual report is released? Especially if it's a big letdown?

Actually, it is someone who has combed the indictments, dates and narrative to lay out exactly what is known to date. A grifter is trying to take your money. This is someone who has taken the time to piece it together and had provided it free of charge.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Mueller Report, in plain sight

https://twitter.com/jentaub/status/1089193853230505984

So it was leaked?

I think not! This is obviously another grifter taking known events to their extremes and re-selling it to the public. What are these people going to do when the actual report is released? Especially if it's a big letdown?

Actually, it is someone who has combed the indictments, dates and narrative to lay out exactly what is known to date. A grifter is trying to take your money. This is someone who has taken the time to piece it together and had provided it free of charge.

Easy, Trumpsters have trouble identifying grifters.