Women who say they aren't voting on the single issue of abortion rights

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I don’t understand why liberals think that all women should want to be able or kill their own children. I think it’s because abortion is so abhorrent that they have to trick themselves into denial about what it really is.

I don't understand why conservatives think all 12 year olds should be made to deliver their rapists babies. I think it's because they can't stand the thought of females having control over their own bodies that they have to trick themselves into denial that a 12 year old is just as much a baby as a week old embryo.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:My dear friend had an abortion at 24 weeks. She found out at about 18 weeks that the fetus had multiple deformities. They scrambled around to experts, seeing if anything could be done. They had tried for years to have a child and had multiple miscarriages.

Turns out the egg and sperm were not genetically compatible and all the organs and limbs were malformed. If they continued the pregnancy the woman risked sepsis, and the birth would only result in an excruciating death of the fetus.

This is what people in the real world face. And stupid people like the Doubting Debbies on this board can STFU.

Ok so then you’d be ok with banning abortions except for cases of birth defects, risk to mother, or rape? Oh of course you wouldn’t. See that’s the problem. You people always try to jump to an extreme example.

After the point of viability, yes. And that was the standard that Roe set. We'd all like to return to that, please.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don’t understand why liberals think that all women should want to be able or kill their own children. I think it’s because abortion is so abhorrent that they have to trick themselves into denial about what it really is.

I don't understand why conservatives think all 12 year olds should be made to deliver their rapists babies. I think it's because they can't stand the thought of females having control over their own bodies that they have to trick themselves into denial that a 12 year old is just as much a baby as a week old embryo.

Would you be ok banning abortions without defects, rape, risk to mother? Ban them from day 1 of pregnancy.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:My dear friend had an abortion at 24 weeks. She found out at about 18 weeks that the fetus had multiple deformities. They scrambled around to experts, seeing if anything could be done. They had tried for years to have a child and had multiple miscarriages.

Turns out the egg and sperm were not genetically compatible and all the organs and limbs were malformed. If they continued the pregnancy the woman risked sepsis, and the birth would only result in an excruciating death of the fetus.

This is what people in the real world face. And stupid people like the Doubting Debbies on this board can STFU.

Ok so then you’d be ok with banning abortions except for cases of birth defects, risk to mother, or rape? Oh of course you wouldn’t. See that’s the problem. You people always try to jump to an extreme example.

After the point of viability, yes. And that was the standard that Roe set. We'd all like to return to that, please.

Why is the point of viability relevant?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don’t understand why liberals think that all women should want to be able or kill their own children. I think it’s because abortion is so abhorrent that they have to trick themselves into denial about what it really is.

I don't understand why conservatives think all 12 year olds should be made to deliver their rapists babies. I think it's because they can't stand the thought of females having control over their own bodies that they have to trick themselves into denial that a 12 year old is just as much a baby as a week old embryo.

Would you be ok banning abortions without defects, rape, risk to mother? Ban them from day 1 of pregnancy.

Define day 1 of pregnancy.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:My dear friend had an abortion at 24 weeks. She found out at about 18 weeks that the fetus had multiple deformities. They scrambled around to experts, seeing if anything could be done. They had tried for years to have a child and had multiple miscarriages.

Turns out the egg and sperm were not genetically compatible and all the organs and limbs were malformed. If they continued the pregnancy the woman risked sepsis, and the birth would only result in an excruciating death of the fetus.

This is what people in the real world face. And stupid people like the Doubting Debbies on this board can STFU.

Ok so then you’d be ok with banning abortions except for cases of birth defects, risk to mother, or rape? Oh of course you wouldn’t. See that’s the problem. You people always try to jump to an extreme example.

After the point of viability, yes. And that was the standard that Roe set. We'd all like to return to that, please.

Why is the point of viability relevant?

Because that is when the fetus is no longer dependent on the body of the woman who is gestating it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don’t understand why liberals think that all women should want to be able or kill their own children. I think it’s because abortion is so abhorrent that they have to trick themselves into denial about what it really is.

I don't understand why conservatives think all 12 year olds should be made to deliver their rapists babies. I think it's because they can't stand the thought of females having control over their own bodies that they have to trick themselves into denial that a 12 year old is just as much a baby as a week old embryo.

Would you be ok banning abortions without defects, rape, risk to mother? Ban them from day 1 of pregnancy.

Define day 1 of pregnancy.

When the egg implants to the wall. So technically that’s day 3 or whatever. I guess I’m a progressive.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:My dear friend had an abortion at 24 weeks. She found out at about 18 weeks that the fetus had multiple deformities. They scrambled around to experts, seeing if anything could be done. They had tried for years to have a child and had multiple miscarriages.

Turns out the egg and sperm were not genetically compatible and all the organs and limbs were malformed. If they continued the pregnancy the woman risked sepsis, and the birth would only result in an excruciating death of the fetus.

This is what people in the real world face. And stupid people like the Doubting Debbies on this board can STFU.

Ok so then you’d be ok with banning abortions except for cases of birth defects, risk to mother, or rape? Oh of course you wouldn’t. See that’s the problem. You people always try to jump to an extreme example.

After the point of viability, yes. And that was the standard that Roe set. We'd all like to return to that, please.

Why is the point of viability relevant?

Because that is when the fetus is no longer dependent on the body of the woman who is gestating it.

The fetus is dependent on the body of the mother until birth.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:My dear friend had an abortion at 24 weeks. She found out at about 18 weeks that the fetus had multiple deformities. They scrambled around to experts, seeing if anything could be done. They had tried for years to have a child and had multiple miscarriages.

Turns out the egg and sperm were not genetically compatible and all the organs and limbs were malformed. If they continued the pregnancy the woman risked sepsis, and the birth would only result in an excruciating death of the fetus.

This is what people in the real world face. And stupid people like the Doubting Debbies on this board can STFU.

Ok so then you’d be ok with banning abortions except for cases of birth defects, risk to mother, or rape? Oh of course you wouldn’t. See that’s the problem. You people always try to jump to an extreme example.

After the point of viability, yes. And that was the standard that Roe set. We'd all like to return to that, please.

Why is the point of viability relevant?

Because that is when the fetus is no longer dependent on the body of the woman who is gestating it.

The fetus is dependent on the body of the mother until birth.

Yes and so she can request birth any time after the point of viability. Don't you agree?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don’t understand why liberals think that all women should want to be able or kill their own children. I think it’s because abortion is so abhorrent that they have to trick themselves into denial about what it really is.

I don't understand why conservatives think all 12 year olds should be made to deliver their rapists babies. I think it's because they can't stand the thought of females having control over their own bodies that they have to trick themselves into denial that a 12 year old is just as much a baby as a week old embryo.

Would you be ok banning abortions without defects, rape, risk to mother? Ban them from day 1 of pregnancy.

Define day 1 of pregnancy.

When the egg implants to the wall. So technically that’s day 3 or whatever. I guess I’m a progressive.

Well that's pretty retrograde in fact. Yikes. You sound controlling.

Do you realize well more than half of fertilized eggs never make it to a live baby? Because nature doesn't impart any sacredness to these early conceptions.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:My dear friend had an abortion at 24 weeks. She found out at about 18 weeks that the fetus had multiple deformities. They scrambled around to experts, seeing if anything could be done. They had tried for years to have a child and had multiple miscarriages.

Turns out the egg and sperm were not genetically compatible and all the organs and limbs were malformed. If they continued the pregnancy the woman risked sepsis, and the birth would only result in an excruciating death of the fetus.

This is what people in the real world face. And stupid people like the Doubting Debbies on this board can STFU.

Ok so then you’d be ok with banning abortions except for cases of birth defects, risk to mother, or rape? Oh of course you wouldn’t. See that’s the problem. You people always try to jump to an extreme example.

After the point of viability, yes. And that was the standard that Roe set. We'd all like to return to that, please.

Why is the point of viability relevant?

Because that is when the fetus is no longer dependent on the body of the woman who is gestating it.

The fetus is dependent on the body of the mother until birth.

Yes and so she can request birth any time after the point of viability. Don't you agree?

That’s news to me. A doctor will do an elective induction at 5.5 months?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don’t understand why liberals think that all women should want to be able or kill their own children. I think it’s because abortion is so abhorrent that they have to trick themselves into denial about what it really is.

I don't understand why conservatives think all 12 year olds should be made to deliver their rapists babies. I think it's because they can't stand the thought of females having control over their own bodies that they have to trick themselves into denial that a 12 year old is just as much a baby as a week old embryo.

Would you be ok banning abortions without defects, rape, risk to mother? Ban them from day 1 of pregnancy.

Define day 1 of pregnancy.

When the egg implants to the wall. So technically that’s day 3 or whatever. I guess I’m a progressive.

Well that's pretty retrograde in fact. Yikes. You sound controlling.

Do you realize well more than half of fertilized eggs never make it to a live baby? Because nature doesn't impart any sacredness to these early conceptions.

Well there would be no need for abortion in those cases, so what’s your point?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don’t understand why liberals think that all women should want to be able or kill their own children. I think it’s because abortion is so abhorrent that they have to trick themselves into denial about what it really is.

I don't understand why conservatives think all 12 year olds should be made to deliver their rapists babies. I think it's because they can't stand the thought of females having control over their own bodies that they have to trick themselves into denial that a 12 year old is just as much a baby as a week old embryo.

Would you be ok banning abortions without defects, rape, risk to mother? Ban them from day 1 of pregnancy.

Define day 1 of pregnancy.

When the egg implants to the wall. So technically that’s day 3 or whatever. I guess I’m a progressive.

Well that's pretty retrograde in fact. Yikes. You sound controlling.

Do you realize well more than half of fertilized eggs never make it to a live baby? Because nature doesn't impart any sacredness to these early conceptions.

Well there would be no need for abortion in those cases, so what’s your point?

Why are YOU imparting sacredness to a 4 day old fertilized egg, valuing it over the life of the person who does not want it attached to her uterine wall?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don’t understand why liberals think that all women should want to be able or kill their own children. I think it’s because abortion is so abhorrent that they have to trick themselves into denial about what it really is.

I don't understand why conservatives think all 12 year olds should be made to deliver their rapists babies. I think it's because they can't stand the thought of females having control over their own bodies that they have to trick themselves into denial that a 12 year old is just as much a baby as a week old embryo.

Would you be ok banning abortions without defects, rape, risk to mother? Ban them from day 1 of pregnancy.

Define day 1 of pregnancy.

When the egg implants to the wall. So technically that’s day 3 or whatever. I guess I’m a progressive.

Well that's pretty retrograde in fact. Yikes. You sound controlling.

Do you realize well more than half of fertilized eggs never make it to a live baby? Because nature doesn't impart any sacredness to these early conceptions.

Well there would be no need for abortion in those cases, so what’s your point?

Why are YOU imparting sacredness to a 4 day old fertilized egg, valuing it over the life of the person who does not want it attached to her uterine wall?

It’s a life. Simple as that. Do women bear not responsibility to take simple steps to avoid getting pregnant if they don’t want to be pregnant?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don’t understand why liberals think that all women should want to be able or kill their own children. I think it’s because abortion is so abhorrent that they have to trick themselves into denial about what it really is.

I don't understand why conservatives think all 12 year olds should be made to deliver their rapists babies. I think it's because they can't stand the thought of females having control over their own bodies that they have to trick themselves into denial that a 12 year old is just as much a baby as a week old embryo.

Would you be ok banning abortions without defects, rape, risk to mother? Ban them from day 1 of pregnancy.

Define day 1 of pregnancy.

When the egg implants to the wall. So technically that’s day 3 or whatever. I guess I’m a progressive.

Well that's pretty retrograde in fact. Yikes. You sound controlling.

Do you realize well more than half of fertilized eggs never make it to a live baby? Because nature doesn't impart any sacredness to these early conceptions.

Well there would be no need for abortion in those cases, so what’s your point?

Why are YOU imparting sacredness to a 4 day old fertilized egg, valuing it over the life of the person who does not want it attached to her uterine wall?

It’s a life. Simple as that. Do women bear not responsibility to take simple steps to avoid getting pregnant if they don’t want to be pregnant?

Do you believe in heaven?