Court: TJ's New Admission Policy Does Not Discriminate

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Let's demolish racial discrimination in school admissions - only days till the ruling!

It will be a great day for diversity of ideas, equitable admissions process and inclusion of Asians as a disadvantaged minority group. Amen.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The trigger for the change was the rampant test buying and cheating which they had to stop.

Define rampant.

Dp

If the test is prone to being bought or cheated on, then it doesn’t matter if 5% of the people have it, or 50%.

Yeah, they want to keep cheating because they are the ones with the advantage.

One of the many centers doing this took out an ad in the paper claiming that 30% of the TJ freshman class had gone to their center and included student names. Now if just one center had 30% of the students, I'd expect the actual number to be closer to 90%. Basically if you didn't have advanced access to the test questions, you had almost no chance of competing or being selected with that process.

Just because they had a high success rate, doesn’t mean they were cheating.

I still stand by my original point that “ If the test is prone to being bought or cheated on, then it doesn’t matter if 5% of the people have it, or 50%.”

It was way more than 50%, and although you may not care about cheating, the school board did so changed the selection criteria accordingly.

Reread my post.

I said that a high success rate does not equate to cheating.

I also said that it’s irrelevant if a small or large percentage are able to buy/cheat the test, the test would need some revamping if it’s cheatable.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Let's demolish racial discrimination in school admissions - only days till the ruling!

It will be a great day for diversity of ideas, equitable admissions process and inclusion of Asians as a disadvantaged minority group. Amen.

We shall overcome this unjust discrimination against Asians someday - hopefully in the next few days!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Let's demolish racial discrimination in school admissions - only days till the ruling!

It will be a great day for diversity of ideas, equitable admissions process and inclusion of Asians as a disadvantaged minority group. Amen.

I heard Asians were the majority at TJ.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The trigger for the change was the rampant test buying and cheating which they had to stop.

Define rampant.

Dp

If the test is prone to being bought or cheated on, then it doesn’t matter if 5% of the people have it, or 50%.

Yeah, they want to keep cheating because they are the ones with the advantage.

One of the many centers doing this took out an ad in the paper claiming that 30% of the TJ freshman class had gone to their center and included student names. Now if just one center had 30% of the students, I'd expect the actual number to be closer to 90%. Basically if you didn't have advanced access to the test questions, you had almost no chance of competing or being selected with that process.

Just because they had a high success rate, doesn’t mean they were cheating.

I still stand by my original point that “ If the test is prone to being bought or cheated on, then it doesn’t matter if 5% of the people have it, or 50%.”

It was way more than 50%, and although you may not care about cheating, the school board did so changed the selection criteria accordingly.

You keep lying about that. The school board never mentioned it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Let's demolish racial discrimination in school admissions - only days till the ruling!

It will be a great day for diversity of ideas, equitable admissions process and inclusion of Asians as a disadvantaged minority group. Amen.

The ruling will not make much difference.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Let's demolish racial discrimination in school admissions - only days till the ruling!

It will be a great day for diversity of ideas, equitable admissions process and inclusion of Asians as a disadvantaged minority group. Amen.

The ruling will not make much difference.

BINGO (it will definitely not do what some of these posters hope)

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The trigger for the change was the rampant test buying and cheating which they had to stop.

Define rampant.

Dp

If the test is prone to being bought or cheated on, then it doesn’t matter if 5% of the people have it, or 50%.

Yeah, they want to keep cheating because they are the ones with the advantage.

One of the many centers doing this took out an ad in the paper claiming that 30% of the TJ freshman class had gone to their center and included student names. Now if just one center had 30% of the students, I'd expect the actual number to be closer to 90%. Basically if you didn't have advanced access to the test questions, you had almost no chance of competing or being selected with that process.

Just because they had a high success rate, doesn’t mean they were cheating.

I still stand by my original point that “ If the test is prone to being bought or cheated on, then it doesn’t matter if 5% of the people have it, or 50%.”

It was way more than 50%, and although you may not care about cheating, the school board did so changed the selection criteria accordingly.

The rampant cheating forced the school board's hand. It had gotten out of control and they had to take action.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The trigger for the change was the rampant test buying and cheating which they had to stop.

Define rampant.

Dp

If the test is prone to being bought or cheated on, then it doesn’t matter if 5% of the people have it, or 50%.

Yeah, they want to keep cheating because they are the ones with the advantage.

One of the many centers doing this took out an ad in the paper claiming that 30% of the TJ freshman class had gone to their center and included student names. Now if just one center had 30% of the students, I'd expect the actual number to be closer to 90%. Basically if you didn't have advanced access to the test questions, you had almost no chance of competing or being selected with that process.

Just because they had a high success rate, doesn’t mean they were cheating.

I still stand by my original point that “ If the test is prone to being bought or cheated on, then it doesn’t matter if 5% of the people have it, or 50%.”

It was way more than 50%, and although you may not care about cheating, the school board did so changed the selection criteria accordingly.

The rampant cheating forced the school board's hand. It had gotten out of control and they had to take action.

Fake news! Not a shred of evidence to support this view. Prove it if you have even a tiny bit of evidence.

What a liar!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The trigger for the change was the rampant test buying and cheating which they had to stop.

Define rampant.

Dp

If the test is prone to being bought or cheated on, then it doesn’t matter if 5% of the people have it, or 50%.

Yeah, they want to keep cheating because they are the ones with the advantage.

One of the many centers doing this took out an ad in the paper claiming that 30% of the TJ freshman class had gone to their center and included student names. Now if just one center had 30% of the students, I'd expect the actual number to be closer to 90%. Basically if you didn't have advanced access to the test questions, you had almost no chance of competing or being selected with that process.

Just because they had a high success rate, doesn’t mean they were cheating.

I still stand by my original point that “ If the test is prone to being bought or cheated on, then it doesn’t matter if 5% of the people have it, or 50%.”

It was way more than 50%, and although you may not care about cheating, the school board did so changed the selection criteria accordingly.

The rampant cheating forced the school board's hand. It had gotten out of control and they had to take action.

Everyone knows this is why they sought to change admissions. A multimillion-dollar industry had sprung up to help people game these tests for a fee. It was really disgusting.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The trigger for the change was the rampant test buying and cheating which they had to stop.

Define rampant.

Dp

If the test is prone to being bought or cheated on, then it doesn’t matter if 5% of the people have it, or 50%.

Yeah, they want to keep cheating because they are the ones with the advantage.

One of the many centers doing this took out an ad in the paper claiming that 30% of the TJ freshman class had gone to their center and included student names. Now if just one center had 30% of the students, I'd expect the actual number to be closer to 90%. Basically if you didn't have advanced access to the test questions, you had almost no chance of competing or being selected with that process.

Just because they had a high success rate, doesn’t mean they were cheating.

I still stand by my original point that “ If the test is prone to being bought or cheated on, then it doesn’t matter if 5% of the people have it, or 50%.”

It was way more than 50%, and although you may not care about cheating, the school board did so changed the selection criteria accordingly.

The rampant cheating forced the school board's hand. It had gotten out of control and they had to take action.

Everyone knows this is why they sought to change admissions. A multimillion-dollar industry had sprung up to help people game these tests for a fee. It was really disgusting.

Exactly. The funny thing is the same people have updated their programs and people are still enrolling in these courses..

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The trigger for the change was the rampant test buying and cheating which they had to stop.

Define rampant.

Dp

If the test is prone to being bought or cheated on, then it doesn’t matter if 5% of the people have it, or 50%.

Yeah, they want to keep cheating because they are the ones with the advantage.

One of the many centers doing this took out an ad in the paper claiming that 30% of the TJ freshman class had gone to their center and included student names. Now if just one center had 30% of the students, I'd expect the actual number to be closer to 90%. Basically if you didn't have advanced access to the test questions, you had almost no chance of competing or being selected with that process.

Just because they had a high success rate, doesn’t mean they were cheating.

I still stand by my original point that “ If the test is prone to being bought or cheated on, then it doesn’t matter if 5% of the people have it, or 50%.”

It was way more than 50%, and although you may not care about cheating, the school board did so changed the selection criteria accordingly.

The rampant cheating forced the school board's hand. It had gotten out of control and they had to take action.

Everyone knows this is why they sought to change admissions. A multimillion-dollar industry had sprung up to help people game these tests for a fee. It was really disgusting.

#veryfakenews #backdoorKaren

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The trigger for the change was the rampant test buying and cheating which they had to stop.

Define rampant.

Dp

If the test is prone to being bought or cheated on, then it doesn’t matter if 5% of the people have it, or 50%.

Yeah, they want to keep cheating because they are the ones with the advantage.

One of the many centers doing this took out an ad in the paper claiming that 30% of the TJ freshman class had gone to their center and included student names. Now if just one center had 30% of the students, I'd expect the actual number to be closer to 90%. Basically if you didn't have advanced access to the test questions, you had almost no chance of competing or being selected with that process.

Just because they had a high success rate, doesn’t mean they were cheating.

I still stand by my original point that “ If the test is prone to being bought or cheated on, then it doesn’t matter if 5% of the people have it, or 50%.”

It was way more than 50%, and although you may not care about cheating, the school board did so changed the selection criteria accordingly.

You keep lying about that. The school board never mentioned it.

Stop it with the facts. That's not how this board works.

[Anonymous]

Asian brothers/sisters and all those seeking peace and justice in this world, the day of reckoning is finally coming for justice and equality for all.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Asian brothers/sisters and all those seeking peace and justice in this world, the day of reckoning is finally coming for justice and equality for all.

Amen to that.