Meghan Markle and Prince Harry News and Updates Part 2

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Will Harry (6th in line) single handedly end the monarchy?


I'm convinced Kate and William are going to have a 4th child after this interview to push him down to #7


and their second through third or fourth or whatever will end up just as embittered as Harry. When the older sibling gets everything, a healthy family dynamic is all but impossible
Anonymous
Royal Family has officially been canceled. This racism accusation is going to be their downfall. Another one bites the dust. Letting the shunning continue! Who’s next? Their is no plausible deniability. There are no grey areas. Today’s media consumer demands nothing less than a complete revision to everything and anything with the even the faintest appearance or possibility of racism! There is no room for doubt. You are either on the right side of history or you are a racist cuck.
Anonymous
I think UK and the RF will come out with a statement that they wish Harry and Megan well, add some photo ops and causes for racial injustice, and this will dissipate pretty quickly. Harry has been cut off, this is all about him trying to get money and sympathy in the US. I'm not saying that the RF is right, but didn't we all know this is how they operate? Of course they manage every aspect of your life including lunch and travel. And of course a RF is concerned that the baby will look less like Daddy, it might question royal lineage. I mean that's all that they have going for them. I'm assuming all babies are DNA tested to make sure their daddy is the right guy.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Royal Family has officially been canceled. This racism accusation is going to be their downfall. Another one bites the dust. Letting the shunning continue! Who’s next? Their is no plausible deniability. There are no grey areas. Today’s media consumer demands nothing less than a complete revision to everything and anything with the even the faintest appearance or possibility of racism! There is no room for doubt. You are either on the right side of history or you are a racist cuck.


Why don't you head back to the political forum.
Anonymous
I'm convinced not only did the Royals not want the biracial/black one to have a child in the first place (they were itching to write 'she's barren' articles but she got pregnant too quickly) but they wanted to punish Meghan for duping them - so they tried to take the only thing they could - the baby's security and HRH.

If he was old enough to school they would have refused to pay for it.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Harry is going to be unhappy until he reconciles with his family which may be out of the question now. It’s going to be ugly. I’m not sure I can make sense out of Meghan’s claims that she had no idea what the royal family was like. It’s pretty unbelievable.



You thought she should know that they would confiscate her passport and drivers license and not let her go to lunch without permission?


I thought she should know that yes you curtsy to the queen and that you give up a lot of personal freedoms, absolutely.


She also talked in the interview about how no one tried to prep or train her on anything and she would stay up all night learning anthems and songs and the right way to do things and the right way to say things to try to make them proud.


Before they said Meg was receiving training even direct instruction from the queen. They claimed she was ready to hit the ground running. Why did they lie?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I feel bad for poor Archie and his little sister. They're going to watch this interview and all the reactions to it, when they're older. Poor kids, a lot of the private stuff should remain private, should have remained private.


I disagree. He'll see first and foremost what his father did to protect his mother and their children.

Harry and Meghan were both pretty circumspect about the worst things. If they'd really wanted to dish on the BRF, so they could have said so much more.


Oh geez, this isn’t some act of valor. Meghan and Harry, but particularly Meghan, were tired of being second fiddle to Kate and William. They didn’t want to live the often monotonous and restrictive life of the real “working royals”. Meghan wants stardom and glamor and to be THE star. That wasn’t going to happen in the UK. They’re behaving like spoiled brats.

And Meghan’s grievances about title, aside from being unfounded and her assertions untrue (there was NO deviation of protocol), reveals what she really wants: status.

Oprah’s look of dubiousness said it all. Also wonder if Meghan was a high maintenance interviewee.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Will Harry (6th in line) single handedly end the monarchy?


He may.

The job itself represents entitlement and oppression - all their diamonds are blood diamonds, all their art and wealth is stolen, fundamentally - but Liz is a steady hand. None of her kids or grandkids have her self-effacement. The institution is a waste and a joke. MM could have knocked down the first domino. That being written, she seems like a stunted ass-ache to me, but we’ll see what happens.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:I think UK and the RF will come out with a statement that they wish Harry and Megan well, add some photo ops and causes for racial injustice, and this will dissipate pretty quickly. Harry has been cut off, this is all about him trying to get money and sympathy in the US. I'm not saying that the RF is right, but didn't we all know this is how they operate? Of course they manage every aspect of your life including lunch and travel. And of course a RF is concerned that the baby will look less like Daddy, it might question royal lineage. I mean that's all that they have going for them. I'm assuming all babies are DNA tested to make sure their daddy is the right guy.


A statement isn't going to cut it. Just like it didn't when Diana died.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Harry is going to be unhappy until he reconciles with his family which may be out of the question now. It’s going to be ugly. I’m not sure I can make sense out of Meghan’s claims that she had no idea what the royal family was like. It’s pretty unbelievable.



You thought she should know that they would confiscate her passport and drivers license and not let her go to lunch without permission?


I thought she should know that yes you curtsy to the queen and that you give up a lot of personal freedoms, absolutely.


She also talked in the interview about how no one tried to prep or train her on anything and she would stay up all night learning anthems and songs and the right way to do things and the right way to say things to try to make them proud.


Before they said Meg was receiving training even direct instruction from the queen. They claimed she was ready to hit the ground running. Why did they lie?


Maybe Meghan lied. I was a big Meghan fan but she’s lost me over the past year. She’s full of BS and nothing but a grifter.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:It's very easy to take a conversation about a future baby's skin color and turn into "concern". I mean why would you be concerned about something you have no power to influence?


They were having a conversation about how to deal with the possibility of the baby being “too dark.” Anyone who tries to paint this as normal speculation about if baby will resemble mom or dad? have brown eyes or green? — is the definition of gaslighting. It’s also the definition of racism.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Harry is going to be unhappy until he reconciles with his family which may be out of the question now. It’s going to be ugly. I’m not sure I can make sense out of Meghan’s claims that she had no idea what the royal family was like. It’s pretty unbelievable.



You thought she should know that they would confiscate her passport and drivers license and not let her go to lunch without permission?


I thought she should know that yes you curtsy to the queen and that you give up a lot of personal freedoms, absolutely.


She also talked in the interview about how no one tried to prep or train her on anything and she would stay up all night learning anthems and songs and the right way to do things and the right way to say things to try to make them proud.


Before they said Meg was receiving training even direct instruction from the queen. They claimed she was ready to hit the ground running. Why did they lie?


Who is 'they' in these scenarios? She DID hit the ground running and her studying made her very successful at the day to day work of a royal.
Anonymous
The family I married into-very far from royals- treated me like this. I tried so hard to get along and fit in. Sometimes my husband helped, but not enough. This is a reality for many interracial couples when they have children. So it is all believable to me, and yet I can’t understand what Meghan expected to happen, that somehow it would be easy? I hope they can find peace and safety.
Anonymous
World's press gathered at Buckingham Palace. Told you this would be big. Let's see how the U.K. people react to being told directly what was going on.

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:I'm convinced not only did the Royals not want the biracial/black one to have a child in the first place (they were itching to write 'she's barren' articles but she got pregnant too quickly) but they wanted to punish Meghan for duping them - so they tried to take the only thing they could - the baby's security and HRH.

If he was old enough to school they would have refused to pay for it.


Archie is not entitled to an HRH or even prince until Charles is King.


Meg and Harry also claimed they did want a title for him. Why did they lie?
Forum Index » Entertainment and Pop Culture
Go to: