Where the heck are the Republicans?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:i am here. Love how democrats waste millions of taxpayers money on something that is a joke. i will come back when there is some actual evidence.

+1

You are both delusional.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:What's it going to take? Trump has been indicted on two separate crimes in court filings. Has any Republican spoken out against this President? All you Republicans on this forum are you not concerned about the brand of your party? Who is going to step forward and separate from this administration? Will it be Graham? Corker? What is it going to take before Trump takes down the party? Can anyone provide me some insider insight becuase I'm sitting here stunned that this is going on and not a single Republican is sticking up for his/her party.

Liar. Trump has not been indicted on anything.

Two years, thirty million dollars later, Mueller's Hail Mary to SDNY is a big nothing burger. Paying off Stormy can be argued as protecting the Trump brand and had nothing to do with the campaign. Obama was only fined by FEC for real campaign finance problems.

What happened to the Russia collusion?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What's it going to take? Trump has been indicted on two separate crimes in court filings. Has any Republican spoken out against this President? All you Republicans on this forum are you not concerned about the brand of your party? Who is going to step forward and separate from this administration? Will it be Graham? Corker? What is it going to take before Trump takes down the party? Can anyone provide me some insider insight becuase I'm sitting here stunned that this is going on and not a single Republican is sticking up for his/her party.

Liar. Trump has not been indicted on anything.

Two years, thirty million dollars later, Mueller's Hail Mary to SDNY is a big nothing burger. Paying off Stormy can be argued as protecting the Trump brand and had nothing to do with the campaign. Obama was only fined by FEC for real campaign finance problems.

What happened to the Russia collusion?

1) it hasn't been $30M
2) he has 10000 times more results than whitewater, bengahzi and emails combined and he is at the tip of the iceberg
3) the SCO is operating in the back to the tune of $10M thanks to asset forfeiture - that income to the treasury will increase as more criminals are reeled in

If you read ALL of the indictments carefully you will see what a fool you are for believing what you hear on Hannity and Rush. Stop watching Fox, read the indictments yourself, every word.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What's it going to take? Trump has been indicted on two separate crimes in court filings. Has any Republican spoken out against this President? All you Republicans on this forum are you not concerned about the brand of your party? Who is going to step forward and separate from this administration? Will it be Graham? Corker? What is it going to take before Trump takes down the party? Can anyone provide me some insider insight becuase I'm sitting here stunned that this is going on and not a single Republican is sticking up for his/her party.

Liar. Trump has not been indicted on anything.

Two years, thirty million dollars later, Mueller's Hail Mary to SDNY is a big nothing burger. Paying off Stormy can be argued as protecting the Trump brand and had nothing to do with the campaign. Obama was only fined by FEC for real campaign finance problems.

What happened to the Russia collusion?

There were strong references with what you are calling "collusion" in both the Manafort and Cohen sentencing documents. Combined with the indictments of the Russian nationals and you can connect the dots yourself. Or, you can believe Judge Pirro or whatever.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What's it going to take? Trump has been indicted on two separate crimes in court filings. Has any Republican spoken out against this President? All you Republicans on this forum are you not concerned about the brand of your party? Who is going to step forward and separate from this administration? Will it be Graham? Corker? What is it going to take before Trump takes down the party? Can anyone provide me some insider insight becuase I'm sitting here stunned that this is going on and not a single Republican is sticking up for his/her party.

Liar. Trump has not been indicted on anything.

Two years, thirty million dollars later, Mueller's Hail Mary to SDNY is a big nothing burger. Paying off Stormy can be argued as protecting the Trump brand and had nothing to do with the campaign. Obama was only fined by FEC for real campaign finance problems.

What happened to the Russia collusion?

1) it hasn't been $30M
2) he has 10000 times more results than whitewater, bengahzi and emails combined and he is at the tip of the iceberg
3) the SCO is operating in the back to the tune of $10M thanks to asset forfeiture - that income to the treasury will increase as more criminals are reeled in

If you read ALL of the indictments carefully you will see what a fool you are for believing what you hear on Hannity and Rush. Stop watching Fox, read the indictments yourself, every word.

+1
You Trumpsters are so snowed it’s almost unbelievable.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What's it going to take? Trump has been indicted on two separate crimes in court filings. Has any Republican spoken out against this President? All you Republicans on this forum are you not concerned about the brand of your party? Who is going to step forward and separate from this administration? Will it be Graham? Corker? What is it going to take before Trump takes down the party? Can anyone provide me some insider insight becuase I'm sitting here stunned that this is going on and not a single Republican is sticking up for his/her party.

Liar. Trump has not been indicted on anything.

Two years, thirty million dollars later, Mueller's Hail Mary to SDNY is a big nothing burger. Paying off Stormy can be argued as protecting the Trump brand and had nothing to do with the campaign. Obama was only fined by FEC for real campaign finance problems.

What happened to the Russia collusion?

1) it hasn't been $30M
2) he has 10000 times more results than whitewater, bengahzi and emails combined and he is at the tip of the iceberg
3) the SCO is operating in the back to the tune of $10M thanks to asset forfeiture - that income to the treasury will increase as more criminals are reeled in

If you read ALL of the indictments carefully you will see what a fool you are for believing what you hear on Hannity and Rush. Stop watching Fox, read the indictments yourself, every word.

+1

[Anonymous]

Hmmmmm...

“President Donald Trump’s intensifying legal troubles are unnerving some of his fellow Republicans. Despite his brash stance, they believe the turmoil has left him increasingly vulnerable as he gears up for what is sure to be a nasty fight for re-election.”

https://apnews.com/dc558078d0bb4b3e8aec63960a7091f0

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Still waiting to hear how the Trump campaign conspired with Russia.

Because if it turns out there's no evidence to support collusion, that makes all the rest of Trump's behavior just fine, and perfectly legal?

Some trees called, they have a forest they'd like you to see.

Well, with that logic, I propose that every president be subject to special counsel investigation for the duration of their time in office. Because just because they haven't found any evidence yet that they've done anything illegal, doesn't mean the rest of their behavior is just fine and perfectly legal.

I want to point out the important point that Trump has yet to be found doing *ANYTHING* illegal. Even the potential campaign finance violation is just that - potential.

And libs forget that Obama’s campaign finance violation was very real and he simply paid a fine

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Still waiting to hear how the Trump campaign conspired with Russia.

Because if it turns out there's no evidence to support collusion, that makes all the rest of Trump's behavior just fine, and perfectly legal?

Some trees called, they have a forest they'd like you to see.

Well, with that logic, I propose that every president be subject to special counsel investigation for the duration of their time in office. Because just because they haven't found any evidence yet that they've done anything illegal, doesn't mean the rest of their behavior is just fine and perfectly legal.

I want to point out the important point that Trump has yet to be found doing *ANYTHING* illegal. Even the potential campaign finance violation is just that - potential.

And libs forget that Obama’s campaign finance violation was very real and he simply paid a fine

Yes Obama’s campaign did indeed violate the law and had to pay steep fines. Let’s remember what the Obama campaign did because it does matter. In the final hectic weeks leading up to the election they did not always meet the 48 hour reporting deadline to report donations in excess of $1000. They did report them but didn’t always make the 48 hour deadline. Sloppy and they were appropriately punished.
Whataboutism fail PP

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:And libs forget that Obama’s campaign finance violation was very real and he simply paid a fine

Screw you - you keep trying to sell this story of Obama campaign finance violations as equivalent to Trump's secret payoff of sex workers, but that's totally not true.

Obama's violations were that his campaign received contributions within 20 days of the election, and failed to report them to the FEC within 48 hours of receiving them. The Obama campaign reported them, but just not within 48 hours, so they paid a fine. By contrast, the Trump campaign knowingly and intentionally hid secret payoffs to sex workers. Big difference. "Obama’s civil FEC infractions, while they resulted in a large fine, are legally distinct from what Cohen pled guilty to, which is the intentional commission of felonies intended to affect the outcome of a federal election."
https://www.snopes.com/news/2018/08/22/election-law-violations-compared-obama-2008-vs-trump-2016/

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Still waiting to hear how the Trump campaign conspired with Russia.

Because if it turns out there's no evidence to support collusion, that makes all the rest of Trump's behavior just fine, and perfectly legal?

Some trees called, they have a forest they'd like you to see.

Well, with that logic, I propose that every president be subject to special counsel investigation for the duration of their time in office. Because just because they haven't found any evidence yet that they've done anything illegal, doesn't mean the rest of their behavior is just fine and perfectly legal.

I want to point out the important point that Trump has yet to be found doing *ANYTHING* illegal. Even the potential campaign finance violation is just that - potential.

And libs forget that Obama’s campaign finance violation was very real and he simply paid a fine

All Rs forget that it was the Rs who fought against campaign finance reform, and a R leaning SCOTUS that struck campaign finance reform. Even today, Rs fight against campaign finance reform even at the state level.

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-court-election-idUSKBN18I1Q4

The conservative-leaning court in recent years has rolled back campaign finance restrictions. In 2010, the court paved the way to unlimited outside spending on elections in a case called FEC v. Citizens United [ie, Tea Party] that concerned corporate spending.

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2018/dec/11/republican-lame-duck-power-grabs-unconstitutional-experts-say

Still, Michigan Republicans are pushing through a bill that would strip authority over campaign finance from the Democratic secretary of state-elect. (The state previously hit the bill’s Republican author with multiple campaign finance violations.)

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Still waiting to hear how the Trump campaign conspired with Russia.

Because if it turns out there's no evidence to support collusion, that makes all the rest of Trump's behavior just fine, and perfectly legal?

Some trees called, they have a forest they'd like you to see.

Well, with that logic, I propose that every president be subject to special counsel investigation for the duration of their time in office. Because just because they haven't found any evidence yet that they've done anything illegal, doesn't mean the rest of their behavior is just fine and perfectly legal.

I want to point out the important point that Trump has yet to be found doing *ANYTHING* illegal. Even the potential campaign finance violation is just that - potential.

And libs forget that Obama’s campaign finance violation was very real and he simply paid a fine

All Rs forget that it was the Rs who fought against campaign finance reform, and a R leaning SCOTUS that struck campaign finance reform. Even today, Rs fight against campaign finance reform even at the state level.

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-court-election-idUSKBN18I1Q4

The conservative-leaning court in recent years has rolled back campaign finance restrictions. In 2010, the court paved the way to unlimited outside spending on elections in a case called FEC v. Citizens United [ie, Tea Party] that concerned corporate spending.

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2018/dec/11/republican-lame-duck-power-grabs-unconstitutional-experts-say

Still, Michigan Republicans are pushing through a bill that would strip authority over campaign finance from the Democratic secretary of state-elect. (The state previously hit the bill’s Republican author with multiple campaign finance violations.)

This is the most offensive thing that the GOP has done in my mind. It’s destroying our country, dollar by dollar.

[Anonymous]

I am old enough to remember when the Republican party wrapped itself in the American flag and held the rule of law up on a pedestal.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I am old enough to remember when the Republican party wrapped itself in the American flag and held the rule of law up on a pedestal.

and thought character counted and morals and ethics were important.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I am old enough to remember when the Republican party wrapped itself in the American flag and held the rule of law up on a pedestal.

and thought character counted and morals and ethics were important.

Well we know any a-holes can wrap themselves in a flag and call themselves patriots. Backing it up is so hard.