Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I make slightly more now, but for most of our 15 years together I made significantly more. I am still in the breadwinner role, even though his income finally climbed, because my income is more stable. I'm also the default parent.
The income has not been an issue itself, but we do clash on money management (he doesn't save, doesn't open mail, etc) and the fact it's affecting "my" income has entered into that. We recently had an uncomfortable conversation because he wants a larger house but has not saved at all; we could afford it only by going into my "mad money" which I've saved. I would be willing if he'd made an effort, but not in the current circumstances.
I feel a lot better about my marriage after reading through this thread. There is a ton of resentment pouring out of these posts, and nothing - nothing- will kill a partnership faster than that. All this stuff about "when the kids were young I resented having to pay daycare so he could make his paltry salary..." Wow. Reverse that for a second and how would people react if a guy said that about his wife's career? And PP, you're saying you've made a lot more money than your husband - yet you won't buy a new home because HE hasn't saved HIS money? Aren't these supposed to be joint purchases, that the family buys together? All this progress in terms of women taking charge of their own careers, being equal partners etc - and it seems like half the wives are still pining for a BigLaw/Plastic Surgeon/Wall St Trader who doubles their salary. Sigh.
1. You inserted the "paltry," try not to use quotation marks when it's a fictional sentence, and
2. The person you're misquoting was talking specifically about being simultaneously the breadwinner
and default parent. Reverse that on this board (some guy posts something similar about once a month) and every response is "divorce the bitch" and/or "I'll marry you, you sound like a prince!"
As far as castigating the PP for not spending "her money," again you're having comprehension problems. They both get mad money, he spent all his, now he wants to spend hers. It's an ant/grasshopper situation, and the entire point of mad money is the spendy person can be wasteful with it without being judged by the fiscally conservative person. But the spendy person can't spend the
other person's mad money on a whim, that's nuts.