Mother found dead in Arlington home

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They're calling it a homicide now.

http://wtop.com/arlington/2015/04/suspicious-death-in-arlington-is-a-homicide/

Must be some red faces for all of you who had already convicted the husband.

Nothing in that article exonerates him.

[Anonymous]

How long does it usually take for forensics to come back?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They're calling it a homicide now.

http://wtop.com/arlington/2015/04/suspicious-death-in-arlington-is-a-homicide/

Must be some red faces for all of you who had already convicted the husband.

Nothing in that article exonerates him.

nothing implicates him either....which is why we let the investigators and detectives do their jobs instead of spewing speculation over an awful crime.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:So DCUM , as usual, is judge, jury, and executioner. Maybe he's guilty and maybe not. The spouse is ALWAYS the no. 1 suspect
Why can't you wait to condemn this man until all the evidence is in.

Because he's a man and this is DCUM

[Anonymous]

This is so sad for this mom and her children and I hope they find who did this to her.

It's a very cool house you can tell that she had worked hard to give her kids a good life. So sad.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They're calling it a homicide now.

http://wtop.com/arlington/2015/04/suspicious-death-in-arlington-is-a-homicide/

Must be some red faces for all of you who had already convicted the husband.

Nothing in that article exonerates him.

Not at all. If anything, the wording carefully avoids exonerating him.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They're calling it a homicide now.

http://wtop.com/arlington/2015/04/suspicious-death-in-arlington-is-a-homicide/

Must be some red faces for all of you who had already convicted the husband.

Nothing in that article exonerates him.

Not at all. If anything, the wording carefully avoids exonerating him.

Exactly. So I don't think any faces of the posters above should be red as a result of that link.

[Anonymous]

She had a restraining order against him. So sad that when women are victims of DV, there is just so little protection. This is why more people don't leave or call the police. They risk angering the abuser and police/the law can't do much anyway. I don't know what the solution is, but this is really sad.

[Anonymous]

^^and I'm pretty sure ex-H is the killer. When women are killed it's frequently a current or ex partner.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:She had a restraining order against him. So sad that when women are victims of DV, there is just so little protection. This is why more people don't leave or call the police. They risk angering the abuser and police/the law can't do much anyway. I don't know what the solution is, but this is really sad.

Sometimes taking out a restraining order makes the abusive person more angry, and more determined. Sometimes people are reluctant to take out a much needed restraining order, sadly.

[Anonymous]

Please. The most likely killer is her soon to be abusive ex husband.

Just going on facts and who would have motive to have her out of the picture.

Of course she might like crazy guys and it could be a love tryst gone wrong.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Please. The most likely killer is her soon to be abusive ex husband.

Just going on pure speculation and my own truth that I made up.

Of course she might like crazy guys and it could be a love tryst gone wrong.

Fixed that for you

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Please. The most likely killer is her soon to be abusive ex husband.

Just going on pure speculation and my own truth that I made up.

Of course she might like crazy guys and it could be a love tryst gone wrong.

Fixed that for you

One of the articles stated that there were incidents of domestic violence and she was afraid of him.
Not a leap to consider him the prime suspect. Clearly you have a chip on your shoulder that is preventing you from taking in the facts.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Please. The most likely killer is her soon to be abusive ex husband.

Just going on pure speculation and my own truth that I made up.

Of course she might like crazy guys and it could be a love tryst gone wrong.

Fixed that for you

One of the articles stated that there were incidents of domestic violence and she was afraid of him.
Not a leap to consider him the prime suspect. Clearly you have a chip on your shoulder that is preventing you from taking in the facts.

Incidents of domestic violence, she'd apparently taken out a protective order against him, and they were due to start a divorce trial today. So, PP may have been speculating but wasn't making stuff up.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Please. The most likely killer is her soon to be abusive ex husband.

Just going on pure speculation and my own truth that I made up.

Of course she might like crazy guys and it could be a love tryst gone wrong.

Fixed that for you

One of the articles stated that there were incidents of domestic violence and she was afraid of him.
Not a leap to consider him the prime suspect. Clearly you have a chip on your shoulder that is preventing you from taking in the facts.

He almost seems TOO obvious of a suspect. Something doesn't seem right here but I don't know what it is.