I'm not a prosecutor but... girls are at higher risk--SA does happen to them more frequently. And men are much more likely to be abusers than women. Maybe the prosecutor isn't trying to eliminate risk (not possible anyway) but to reduce it. |
|
There are at least to weirdos here; OP and the former prosecutor.
|
Meanwhile people are in the Michael Jackson thread saying he was just a big kid and it was all totally normal. |
If he’s a predator like OP implies, surely she has court orders, restraining orders and full custody. OP is inferring that he is a monster and no kid is safe around him. Surely she has taken legal action to keep her daughters from harm. Oh, wait… |
Yes they are easily identifiable |
|
Y'all are taking crazy pills. If a father of girls is looking to molest he's gonna do it whether there's a wife around or not. And if a father of girls is looking to molest he's gonna do it with his own girls--not with their friends where the risk of getting caught is much higher.
Question for the prosecutor: exactly how many cases have you prosecuted where the perpetrator was the single father of underaged girls and the victims weren't related to him and were molested at sleepovers? |
Why are you not in contact with the parents of children spending time at your child's house? |
With all due respect, there is a very high bar in the USA for these things, especially on the Commonwealth of Virginia side of the DMV. Very high. |
To answer your question OP: Yes, you are clearly crazy. |
|
I don't know where people are getting pedo predator from the OP. XH doesn't sound like a prize, but an alcoholic affair-haver doesn't automatically equal pedo groomer predator.
The alcoholism/DUI would suggest he's likely not a good supervisor of children if he's solo parenting. That would likely be enough for me to nix a sleepover. But PPs seem to be making some major leaps. It's enough for a guy to "just" be a crappy husband/human. |
I think when OP highlights the fact that it's "little girls" sleeping over, it implies a gender based concern. There is a couple other references in her post which highlight the gender issue ("I actually assumed it would be hard for him to even have playdates at his house as a solo dad with only daughters"), which is why people assumed she was talking about him as a possible predator. I agree that the DUI is a legitimate concern, but 1) that's not gendered which the post definitely is and 2) no one but her knows about that. She thinks being a divorced man (emphasis on the man) is enough of a red flag to mean you wouldn't send your "little girls" (emphasis on the girls) to sleepover there. The implication is that there's something of a sexual nature that should be concerning them. |
|
They're crazy.
Did you ever have any evidence that he's also a pedo? |
Agree. And the drinking/DUI - no mention of how long ago that was. It’s possible the trial and everything made him seek treatment and become a better person. Not excusing a DUI, but people do change. And honestly 9 & 10 are not “little girls” anymore. I think the OP is angry that her ex is friendly with this other family that she is not friendly with. Did ex “poison” them against her, or does she come off as a nutty ex-wife out for her ex? |
She’s just bitter that he had an affair and he had a drinking problem. Nothing in having an affair or having a drinking problem indicates that he’s a pedo. |
| who did he have the affair with? |