| I think the breakdown of civic institutions and the breakdown of men are related, particularly for young men who just seem completely lost. Like religion and organized groups gave men mentorship and socialization and an idea of how they are “supposed” to be, often to the exclusion of women. Now those groups don’t really shape men so all they have is their family, which may not be enough. |
No, this is a good point. Too many men are just slovenly. Like the suburban dad uniform of khaki cargo shorts, a T-shirt from college, trainers and backwards trucker cap (probably to cover their growing bald spot). Not a lot of men out there who wear pressed trousers, a polo or button-down shirt of natural material or a quarter-zip, shoes that coordinate with their belt. It's like they're all clones. Bring back men in fedoras and three-piece suits when they're out in public, I say. |
Op, if you observe history, men either give in and allow a matriarchal society with women leading, or they get jealous and take steps to control women into submission…sometimes both. It’s as old as time itself. Men just can’t be better. Again, there are wonderful examples…but overall our culture allows them to be mediocre. They need more parental care than most are willing to give. |
We're talking about reality. I'm sorry you have a bad picker. But you need to stop confusing your own limited life experience with being norm. You're clearly an outlier. |
This. I’m tired of the “useless man” rants. I know a lot of really crappy women. Some people are awesome, others are not. DH and I have plenty of flaws, really good characteristics. I do agree with PP up thread that mentioned men learning from their fathers. People are products of their upbringing and I think historically girls have been/are more likely to be taught relationship skills growing up in a way that boys were/are not. |
That’s the MRA “prattle” poster. He pops up in this forum on the regular. Ignore. |
|
There’s been a lot of research showing men are far more susceptible to peer influence and are overall highly concerned with how other man think of them. They behave in ways that align them with the alpha male, rather than with females.
So you now have a bunch of men who all basically suck, so they all default to the worst possible person, and when you throw in the podcasters (who are the alphas now), they align themselves with those men. Even if it results in worse lives for themselves. The only real way for men to improve is to hold each other accountable. Or possibly, if he’s been through the pain of breakups/divorce, that might be enough to spur a change. But usually it just results in them swearing off women. |
Lesbian here. We leave like men. That's why the divorce rate is higher. We don't stick around, "stand by our (wo)man", tolerate abuse, etc. We're not financially dependent on a partner the way many hets are (the wage gap continues, outliers notwithstanding). We also probably communicate better, so it's easier to divide a home, the kids, the pets, etc. without all the horrible nonsense many women trying to leave a man go through. We don't have to stay, so we don't. It's very masc, but in a functional way. So stop using it to justify male mediocrity because it's not the same thing. |
This, but also? Who's raising these "men"? Who's enabling them? Who's marrying them, coddling them, sleeping with them...? They don't improve their behavior because they can still get what they want while behaving this way. Too many women are desperate to be in a relationship and will settle for some mother's mediocre son. If women raised their standards, men would have to rise to the challenge. But there's too many opportunities to be a piece of trash man and still have a wife, a family, etc. And they're getting aware of this, which is why they want to make divorces harder to get, demand more kids (because a woman would leave for herself, but they stay "for the kids"). Women need to realize the whole system is a scam and opt out and then men will need to figure out a way to reconnect. Many of them won't; the bottom-feeders will still listen to their toxic masculinity bros and hide in their goonercaves. But we didn't want them anyway, so no real loss there. The ones who can evolve will, once the stakes are high enough. |
|
Because as long as men can fertilize women, they qualify. They are pursued according to:
-Find man with sperm -Receive sperm -Seethe a lifetime in silence about the sperm delivery system |
+1 Men need to change the culture to be about being the best man, not the laziest man who got away with the most bs. Men pride themselves on being disgusting for the accolades and praise and "points" they get from other mediocre men. |
This. If ever there were an example of observation bias, this OP is it. |
|
Birds of a feather. I know many good men. I was raised by one, I am married to one, and my social and family circles are full of men who are good husbands and fathers. Gainfully employed, involved in family life, etc.
And sure, I can name some duds, too, but they are the exception. |
Straight woman here, thank you for this explanation, it makes sense! |
I'm no MRA guy, although prattle is a fantastic word, especially to dismiss crazy woman rants. I will push back on the rampant misandry on this site, though. As should everyone. It's toxic and has no place here in a parenting forum. |