Birthright Citizenship

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Who donates to this zhit to sponsor illegals’ babies as citizens?

Birthright citizenship mostly affects the rich not the poor.. I know Trump knows this because he was in the hotel business but the hotel industry benefits ALOT from birth tourism. Rich foreigners /royals who come to the Us at 6-7 months pregnant, stay here for a few months to give birth, then travel back to their country as soon as the newborn baby is cleared to travel. They do this because the American passport is considered the strongest passport/citizenship in the world. They just want their kids born here because being an American is a status symbol and then they’ll raise them back in their native country.

Lot of wealthy folks do this. Trump knows and I’m sure he is fine with birthright citizenship for the rich. It’s only the poor “anchor babies” (the ones who choose to stay) he has a problem with

Wrong.

95% of anchor babies are to poor illegal immigrants who desire to stay in America indefinitely for economic and opportunistic reasons.
Check out the SSA office and translators and NGOs there to aid them.
Not LatAm or China Birth tourism where they come for 6 mos and leave w an American baby.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Who donates to this zhit to sponsor illegals’ babies as citizens?

Birthright citizenship mostly affects the rich not the poor.. I know Trump knows this because he was in the hotel business but the hotel industry benefits ALOT from birth tourism. Rich foreigners /royals who come to the Us at 6-7 months pregnant, stay here for a few months to give birth, then travel back to their country as soon as the newborn baby is cleared to travel. They do this because the American passport is considered the strongest passport/citizenship in the world. They just want their kids born here because being an American is a status symbol and then they’ll raise them back in their native country.

Lot of wealthy folks do this. Trump knows and I’m sure he is fine with birthright citizenship for the rich. It’s only the poor “anchor babies” (the ones who choose to stay) he has a problem with

lol that you think the <5% of “anchor babies” that are born with a tourist visa wealthy Mother are staying in a hotel. Lol.

They stay at their rich aunts house or their parents own here. Or rent a damn house for the year.

[Anonymous]

We are officially a fascist dictatorship. Look at Hungary. Viktor Orban followed the exact same playbook. First, take over the Supreme Court. Check. Then attack the news media. Check. Then the lawyers, intellectuals, teachers, universities, check, check, check, check.

This is unconstitutional, and yet the SCOTUS decides it can write us a new constitution.

This is grim, indeed.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:They didn’t actually rule on the content of the executive order. It was more that they ruled that District courts couldn’t make national injunctions. So, everyone one has to file their own lawsuit. If the administration chooses not to fight on appeal if they lose, that one person gets citizenship. As a result, everyone born in U.S. with an undocumented person as their mother will have to sue for citizenship. If they don’t sue, they don’t get it. At least, that is my understanding. I’ll be happy to hear other opinions. Nice way to clog up the courts.

That's exactly the idea. This administration wants to make the courts nonfunctional. They want ALL power in the executive branch.

It is absolutely horrifying. I didn't realize the SCOTUS had been bought by Peter Thiel too!! When Roberts voted in favor of same sex marriage, I thought he actually had a soul. My mistake. He has no heart either.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:an immigrant advocate group already filed an amended complaint seeking class action relief in its birthright citizenship case in federal court in Maryland

Yes, they had the case ready to file the minute this expected result came down from the
SCOTUS. Checks and balances are gone. We are no longer a democracy.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There is zero valid nor practical nor helpful reason for it to exist in America today.

Only invalid, impractical, convoluted reasons to keep it.

Same with 2A. Let it rip then.

Absolutely. Get rid of 2A.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There is zero valid nor practical nor helpful reason for it to exist in America today.

Only invalid, impractical, convoluted reasons to keep it.

Same with 2A. Let it rip then.

Absolutely. Get rid of 2A.

Good luck! LOL

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Who donates to this zhit to sponsor illegals’ babies as citizens?

You see, birthright citizen ship is written into the United States Constitution.

If you want to change the Constitution, you'll need 38 states to ratify an amendment.

I don't see 38 ruby red states. The SCOTUS cannot ratify the U.S. Constitution.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There is zero valid nor practical nor helpful reason for it to exist in America today.

Only invalid, impractical, convoluted reasons to keep it.

Same with 2A. Let it rip then.

Absolutely. Get rid of 2A.

Good luck! LOL

Gosh, so funny!

All those parents who lost their kids in school shootings are laughing right along with you!

Ha ha ha ha!! You're terrific! What a great person!! If you are a person and not a bot.

[Anonymous]

No one should be granted citizenship at birth in the U.S. Instead we will have a Hunger Games style competition for citizenship with all the kids in the US.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Who donates to this zhit to sponsor illegals’ babies as citizens?

You see, birthright citizen ship is written into the United States Constitution.

If

Nope.

“Subject to the jurisdiction thereof”

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:an immigrant advocate group already filed an amended complaint seeking class action relief in its birthright citizenship case in federal court in Maryland

Yes, but Federal District Judges can no longer issue universal injunction. Since suits are pending in only 22 states, the Executive Order will take effect in the other 28 states until the issue is finally decided on the merits by the Supreme Court. It’s going to be messy until then. Buckle up!

No mas anchor bebes?!

Uh oh. Who’s gonna tell Barron, Don Jr, Ivanka, and Eric?

Educated literate ones don’t count. Net positive

Clearly, you are NOT one of the "educated, literate ones."

My former eye surgeon immigrated to the US when he was in high school. He now heads a major medical center. He graduated from Harvard Medical School. His kids are both Ivy League graduates. He went to community college. His parents picked crops.

Your ignorance is sickening PP.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Who donates to this zhit to sponsor illegals’ babies as citizens?

Birthright citizenship mostly affects the rich not the poor..

I know Trump knows this because he was in the hotel business but the hotel industry benefits ALOT from birth tourism. Rich foreigners /royals who come to the Us at 6-7 months pregnant, stay here for a few months to give birth, then travel back to their country as soon as the newborn baby is cleared to travel. They do this because the American passport is considered the strongest passport/citizenship in the world. They just want their kids born here because being an American is a status symbol and then they’ll raise them back in their native country.

Lot of wealthy folks do this. Trump knows and I’m sure he is fine with birthright citizenship for the rich. It’s only the poor “anchor babies” (the ones who choose to stay) he has a problem with

Great. Thx for filling us in. Get rid of it. Get rid of Birthright Citizenship in USA.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:We are officially a fascist dictatorship. Look at Hungary. Viktor Orban followed the exact same playbook. First, take over the Supreme Court. Check. Then attack the news media. Check. Then the lawyers, intellectuals, teachers, universities, check, check, check, check.

This is unconstitutional, and yet the SCOTUS decides it can write us a new constitution.

This is grim, indeed.

Hungary has Citizenship by Birth still? Fantastic! Tell the Hondurans

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There is zero valid nor practical nor helpful reason for it to exist in America today.

Only invalid, impractical, convoluted reasons to keep it.

Same with 2A. Let it rip then.

Absolutely. Get rid of 2A.

Get rid of illegal immigrants first