Birthright Citizenship

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:an immigrant advocate group already filed an amended complaint seeking class action relief in its birthright citizenship case in federal court in Maryland

Yes, but Federal District Judges can no longer issue universal injunction. Since suits are pending in only 22 states, the Executive Order will take effect in the other 28 states until the issue is finally decided on the merits by the Supreme Court. It’s going to be messy until then. Buckle up!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Trump is holding a news conference. Help me understand what's happening.

Nothing.

The end of Birthright Citizenship is working its way up the chain of process and procedure.

Good.

[Anonymous]

There is zero valid nor practical nor helpful reason for it to exist in America today.

Only invalid, impractical, convoluted reasons to keep it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:There is zero valid nor practical nor helpful reason for it to exist in America today.

Only invalid, impractical, convoluted reasons to keep it.

Same with 2A. Let it rip then.

[Anonymous]

Can’t believe USA still has it.

It’s a well known fact everywhere it’s there to be taken advantage of, a meal ticket- anchor child or someone who can sponsor you and the whole family once age 18.

Illegals’ anchor babies, Asian birth tourists, temp workers, temp grad students.

Everyone wants a USA baby who can help keep them in USA and sponsor more from the homeland .

And remit money back. Lots of money.

[Anonymous]

Our birth rate is too low to be sustainable. SS is already on the verge of running out of cash. Be careful what you wish for.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There is zero valid nor practical nor helpful reason for it to exist in America today.

Only invalid, impractical, convoluted reasons to keep it.

Same with 2A. Let it rip then.

Are the foreigners and their millions on the family sponsor list bringing guns?!

Because until we know WTf is IN our country and they are all here legally, I’ll be keeping our guns. Deal?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They didn’t actually rule on the content of the executive order. It was more that they ruled that District courts couldn’t make national injunctions. So, everyone one has to file their own lawsuit. If the administration chooses not to fight on appeal if they lose, that one person gets citizenship. As a result, everyone born in U.S. with an undocumented person as their mother will have to sue for citizenship. If they don’t sue, they don’t get it. At least, that is my understanding. I’ll be happy to hear other opinions. Nice way to clog up the courts.

Red state judges are just as guilty of trying to establish ruling for the entire country.

Easily falsified by the number of nationwide injunctions we’ve seen in previous presidents vs Trump.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:an immigrant advocate group already filed an amended complaint seeking class action relief in its birthright citizenship case in federal court in Maryland

Yes, but Federal District Judges can no longer issue universal injunction. Since suits are pending in only 22 states, the Executive Order will take effect in the other 28 states until the issue is finally decided on the merits by the Supreme Court. It’s going to be messy until then. Buckle up!

No mas anchor bebes?!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I wonder if he’ll actually say we just want whites in America. For the billionaire class and the proletariat.

He’s pro h1B and Highly Skilled Migrant visas.

We’re all pro LEGAL immigration (phony false asylum economic migrant cases aside. That program is a $hit$how joke.)

[Anonymous]

I feel sorry for real actual asylum seekers with a valid application. Not a chain migration NGO “make more pesos up north” one.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:They didn’t actually rule on the content of the executive order. It was more that they ruled that District courts couldn’t make national injunctions. So, everyone one has to file their own lawsuit. If the administration chooses not to fight on appeal if they lose, that one person gets citizenship. As a result, everyone born in U.S. with an undocumented person as their mother will have to sue for citizenship. If they don’t sue, they don’t get it. At least, that is my understanding. I’ll be happy to hear other opinions. Nice way to clog up the courts.

Or self deport.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There is zero valid nor practical nor helpful reason for it to exist in America today.

Only invalid, impractical, convoluted reasons to keep it.

Same with 2A. Let it rip then.

Are the foreigners and their millions on the family sponsor list bringing guns?!

Because until we know WTf is IN our country and they are all here legally, I’ll be keeping our guns. Deal?

Pp’s point is that republicans are effectively conceding that constitutional amendments can and should be repealed. But they defend the 2A as their constitutional right and the reason why they can have all the guns they want with zero accountability.

In other words, they are shooting themselves in the foot. No pun intended.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There is zero valid nor practical nor helpful reason for it to exist in America today.

Only invalid, impractical, convoluted reasons to keep it.

Same with 2A. Let it rip then.

Are the foreigners and their millions on the family sponsor list bringing guns?!

Because until we know WTf is IN our country and they are all here legally, I’ll be keeping our guns. Deal?

Pp’s point is that republicans are effectively conceding that constitutional amendments can and should be repealed. But they defend the 2A as their constitutional right and the reason why they can have all the guns they want with zero accountability.

In other words, they are shooting themselves in the foot. No pun intended.

When has any Republican denied that there is a constitutional process to repeal amendments? Do you think we don’t remember prohibition?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:an immigrant advocate group already filed an amended complaint seeking class action relief in its birthright citizenship case in federal court in Maryland

Yes, but Federal District Judges can no longer issue universal injunction. Since suits are pending in only 22 states, the Executive Order will take effect in the other 28 states until the issue is finally decided on the merits by the Supreme Court. It’s going to be messy until then. Buckle up!

No mas anchor bebes?!

Uh oh. Who’s gonna tell Barron, Don Jr, Ivanka, and Eric?