Gerry Connolly Beats AOC in Race for Key Democratic Congressional Post

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I love AOC. She is an amazing orator. Her speech and writing is authentic, passionate and inspiring. I’m not even a progressive but she certainly would have my support.

The one I really don’t like is Jamal. She grates on me and never inspires any desire to get behind her ideas.

I know, I love the way she went down to fake cry at the border when Trump was president - in her spotless white ensemble and red lipstick. The authenticity of that stunt really pierced my heart.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:House leadership must really hate AOC if they endorsed Gerry over her. No shade against Gerry, he is my rep and I like him, but he literally has cancer and has missed appearances that he usually makes.

+1 Jealousy?

NP. What is this "jealousy" trope that always comes up whenever people express dislike of AOC? It's as idiotic as the "misogyny/racist" nonsense when expressing criticism of a woman or POC. Give it a rest. AOC is too far to the left, period.

I don't see her as far left as she is generally portrayed to be. Most people with high IQs are middle/moderates and she is clearly one of high intelligence. We'd be a hell of a lot better off with someone as smart as her in The White House than we are with the two elderly bums, Trump and Biden.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:House leadership must really hate AOC if they endorsed Gerry over her. No shade against Gerry, he is my rep and I like him, but he literally has cancer and has missed appearances that he usually makes.

+1 Jealousy?

NP. What is this "jealousy" trope that always comes up whenever people express dislike of AOC? It's as idiotic as the "misogyny/racist" nonsense when expressing criticism of a woman or POC. Give it a rest. AOC is too far to the left, period.

I don't see her as far left as she is generally portrayed to be. Most people with high IQs are middle/moderates and she is clearly one of high intelligence. We'd be a hell of a lot better off with someone as smart as her in The White House than we are with the two elderly bums, Trump and Biden.

Well we will only have one elderly bum come January 20th

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Connely is awful

With all the overwhelming immigration he has done NOTHiNG to help sterling middle school that has turned title one on his watch

He is awful yet a perfect example of democrat

Name a Republican or Dem politician that isn't awful. Crickets.

Chris Van Hollen.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:White male privilege.

I have come to like AOC and think she has an interesting voice. But with the backlash against DEIJ and social warriorism, it may be better to have a white male in this role.

How isn't that DEI? Only white men get the job because they are men and white?

No, what I meant is that she's the GOP's poster child for Wokeism, fairly or unfairly. They (The GOP) won't have her to use as an example of the Dems being controlled by the left wing.

Got it. My question is why haven't we ever considered white men to be the DEI? After all, whether they were mediocre or poor they were hired for many jobs just because they were white and men. And still are! We are trying to give other people a chance and then they say 'no fair!'

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Connely is awful

With all the overwhelming immigration he has done NOTHiNG to help sterling middle school that has turned title one on his watch

He is awful yet a perfect example of democrat

Name a Republican or Dem politician that isn't awful. Crickets.

Chris Van Hollen.

Van Hollen. Interesting. He is one of the few that has been consistently outspoken against Israel's aggressive war tactics. Just wait until he moves a little further along in politics; his views will evolve once his campaigns become heavily funded by sources with close ties to Israel. None of them are immune to it. Money talks.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Connely is awful

With all the overwhelming immigration he has done NOTHiNG to help sterling middle school that has turned title one on his watch

He is awful yet a perfect example of democrat

Please go get educated in how government or frankly, anything, works.

[Anonymous]

She’s a nut job.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:She will have her chance and, hopefully, as soon as 2027!

The man has esophageal cancer. Odds are good she has another change way before 2027.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I love AOC. She is an amazing orator. Her speech and writing is authentic, passionate and inspiring. I’m not even a progressive but she certainly would have my support.

The one I really don’t like is Jamal. She grates on me and never inspires any desire to get behind her ideas.

I know, I love the way she went down to fake cry at the border when Trump was president - in her spotless white ensemble and red lipstick. The authenticity of that stunt really pierced my heart.

Ah yes, because the Republican dufuses virtue signaling and doing photo ops at the border were SOOOO much more gen-u-wine!

Republicans: Look at us, y'all - we're in a boat, randomly pointing at stuff, and when we get back to Congress we're going to do absolutely jack shit about the border, except to blame Democrats.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:She’s a nut job.

Yes, I'm sure every Republican outlet you follow has repeatedly told you she's a nut job least 40 or 50 times, meanwhile I doubt you've actually heard her speak or read any of her bills. You just swallow whatever garbage you're spoonfed.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I love AOC. She is an amazing orator. Her speech and writing is authentic, passionate and inspiring. I’m not even a progressive but she certainly would have my support.

The one I really don’t like is Jamal. She grates on me and never inspires any desire to get behind her ideas.

I know, I love the way she went down to fake cry at the border when Trump was president - in her spotless white ensemble and red lipstick. The authenticity of that stunt really pierced my heart.

I guess you prefer a buffoon in an ill-fitting suit throwing paper towels, amirite?

[Anonymous]

Same hubris that kept Ginsburg in place. Nancy did this.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She’s a nut job.

Yes, I'm sure every Republican outlet you follow has repeatedly told you she's a nut job least 40 or 50 times, meanwhile I doubt you've actually heard her speak or read any of her bills. You just swallow whatever garbage you're spoonfed.

DP
The green new deal was pretty nutty.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:House leadership must really hate AOC if they endorsed Gerry over her. No shade against Gerry, he is my rep and I like him, but he literally has cancer and has missed appearances that he usually makes.

+1 Jealousy?

NP. What is this "jealousy" trope that always comes up whenever people express dislike of AOC? It's as idiotic as the "misogyny/racist" nonsense when expressing criticism of a woman or POC. Give it a rest. AOC is too far to the left, period.

I don't see her as far left as she is generally portrayed to be. Most people with high IQs are middle/moderates and she is clearly one of high intelligence. We'd be a hell of a lot better off with someone as smart as her in The White House than we are with the two elderly bums, Trump and Biden.

AOC smart?

Remember when she thought we could save 21 trillion dollars a year at the pentagon?
Or when she blew up the deal with amazon in her district?
Or when she thought that illegal aliens sneaking across the border were asylum seekers?
Or when she said the unemployment rate was low because everyone has two jobs?
Or when she said the world was going to end in a few years because of global warming?