King Charles and Prince William wished Harry a Happy 40th Birthday!

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:You mean their PR teams did. You really think they’re posting on social media??


When William and Catherine personally sign off on social media posts, you will see their initials. No initials on this today. As it should be.


Ouch! So they didn’t personally wish Aunt Anne a happy birthday either bc they didn’t sign it? Poor Anne Same for Uncle Eddie, I fear. Shuns all around!
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:$8.5 million inheritance on his 40th.

Will be all gone by June 2025.


I was about to post they'll spend it by the end of the year.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:The protocol that the queen had set was to acknowledge birthdays ending in zero for non working royals. That’s all. Harry is a traitor and will never again be trusted.

Harry was not a traitor, he had no choice but to leave. The palace has been behind a lot of toxic press.
Look into the rehabilitation of Camilla on you tube. It is eye opening and not surprising.
The timing was bad for Harry and Meghan. Prince Andrew needed to be protected and every article about them was not an article about him.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:$8.5 million inheritance on his 40th.

Will be all gone by June 2025.


I was about to post they'll spend it by the end of the year.


They do "live high" as Bruce Springsteen once mentioned when talking about going on tour. Living high requires high income.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The protocol that the queen had set was to acknowledge birthdays ending in zero for non working royals. That’s all. Harry is a traitor and will never again be trusted.

Harry was not a traitor, he had no choice but to leave. The palace has been behind a lot of toxic press.
Look into the rehabilitation of Camilla on you tube. It is eye opening and not surprising.
The timing was bad for Harry and Meghan. Prince Andrew needed to be protected and every article about them was not an article about him.


He was a liar and a traitor to his family.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:It is surprising. Very nice, maybe they know something we don’t.


My thought too.


+1.


Like what? He and Meghan are divorcing?


I think they have had more contact since Charles and Catherine had cancer than the public is privy too.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The protocol that the queen had set was to acknowledge birthdays ending in zero for non working royals. That’s all. Harry is a traitor and will never again be trusted.

Harry was not a traitor, he had no choice but to leave. The palace has been behind a lot of toxic press.
Look into the rehabilitation of Camilla on you tube. It is eye opening and not surprising.
The timing was bad for Harry and Meghan. Prince Andrew needed to be protected and every article about them was not an article about him.


He was a liar and a traitor to his family.

No
He has been thoroughly used by Prince Charles and Camilla for positive publicity, even by William
It’s a dirty game that they play. He was wise to get out.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:This warmed my heart. Perhaps both of their recent experiences with cancer made them realize life is too short. I hope they can repair their relationship!


I think you're reading too much into it. I think this is just a formal, PR-driven acknowledgement of a milestone birthday. If they ignored his birthday completely the optics would be terrible, and they (William/Catherine) would have opened themselves up to a lot of criticism.


+1 Have to be careful when your words could be used to criticize you in a book or on television. Trust has been broken.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The protocol that the queen had set was to acknowledge birthdays ending in zero for non working royals. That’s all. Harry is a traitor and will never again be trusted.

Harry was not a traitor, he had no choice but to leave. The palace has been behind a lot of toxic press.
Look into the rehabilitation of Camilla on you tube. It is eye opening and not surprising.
The timing was bad for Harry and Meghan. Prince Andrew needed to be protected and every article about them was not an article about him.


He was a liar and a traitor to his family.


+1
Anonymous
They are losers until they provide security for him inside the UK.

Anonymous
It's just PR. If they really wanted to be with him, the King or Prince William would have gotten together with Harry the last two times he did the 14 hour flight to London. They did not.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:They are losers until they provide security for him inside the UK.



If lack of security keeps Harry and Meghan out of the UK, all the better.
Anonymous
M can't handle living in the UK anyway -- the ceilings are too low and the floors are crooked. She should stay in California where she belongs, and Harry should stay with her.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:This warmed my heart. Perhaps both of their recent experiences with cancer made them realize life is too short. I hope they can repair their relationship!


I think you're reading too much into it. I think this is just a formal, PR-driven acknowledgement of a milestone birthday. If they ignored his birthday completely the optics would be terrible, and they (William/Catherine) would have opened themselves up to a lot of criticism.


+1 Have to be careful when your words could be used to criticize you in a book or on television. Trust has been broken.


Yikes if they only make good choices because they’re afraid of being exposed as awful people in the non-UK media.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The protocol that the queen had set was to acknowledge birthdays ending in zero for non working royals. That’s all. Harry is a traitor and will never again be trusted.

Harry was not a traitor, he had no choice but to leave. The palace has been behind a lot of toxic press.
Look into the rehabilitation of Camilla on you tube. It is eye opening and not surprising.
The timing was bad for Harry and Meghan. Prince Andrew needed to be protected and every article about them was not an article about him.


He was a liar and a traitor to his family.

No
He has been thoroughly used by Prince Charles and Camilla for positive publicity, even by William
It’s a dirty game that they play. He was wise to get out.


Eh no. This is a weird narrative that has been pushed but Megan and Harry were totally protected by the palace. The queen bent over backwards to give her perks and privelages no Windsor bride had ever had. Charles walked her down the aisle. Will and Kate let her be a leader of the royal foundation even before she was married. Harry and Megan leaked very ugly stories to the media about Kate
Forum Index » Entertainment and Pop Culture
Go to: