Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I wish the WCAC would get a clue and add the shot clock.
Boys use them. Not sure why the girls don’t.
Too many weak teams that benefit from being able to try to hold the ball for longer periods of time. The other team can't score if they don't have the ball.
The boys and co-ed schools already have the clocks due to football. The all-girls schools had no reason for a shot clock on the fields so they don't have them built into the scoreboards and it would be a pretty good expense to add them.
You mean like the $50k plus tuition expense at a lot of these schools? Outdoor shot clocks can be had for a few hundred bucks. I think they can afford it.
Haha now I get it your public school parent your ignorance on the topic of tuition shows. The all girls schools in the WCAC are not 50k a year not even close, the coeds like SJC and GC are right around $30. The average tuition across the board in the WCAC is probably around 28-29k
The topic wasn't tuition, it was shot clock cost and it was hyperbole. Get a dictionary. You could probably work on your character as well, but I doubt it'd help.
I disagree whoever the OP was made tuition part of the discussion when the correlation was made between the tuition cost and how that could pay for the shit clock cost.
Again, look up the definition of hyperbole. Also, some of us are lucky enough that it's just a bill to be paid, not knowing with any exactitude or even guesswork. While understanding others might have to comparison shopand know exactly what's going out, counting pennies as they're overextended.