IVF may soon end in Alabama

[Anonymous]

This is horrific. Can't imagine what families are going through that are doing ivf in Alabama right now. I can't even understand what will happen to their current frozen embryos. And if this goes to the supreme court it could trickle down to us

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The Catholic Church forbids IVF so many predominantly Catholic Countries either forbid IVF or have restrictions . Many other countries have a bunch of restrictions
Costa Rica banned IVF from 2000 to 2016
Italy IVF is only allowed between married heterosexual couple.
Germany, Switzerland, Netherlands, and Austria all forbid the practice of using donor eggs. Surrogacy is also not allowed in those countries except for the Netherlands.

Yes, Catholics suck. Your point?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Elections have consequences

Vote for Gilead, don't be surprised when they come for all the uteraii in your family

The scary part is that many people actually want Gilead. WTF is wrong with people?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Catholic Church forbids IVF so many predominantly Catholic Countries either forbid IVF or have restrictions . Many other countries have a bunch of restrictions
Costa Rica banned IVF from 2000 to 2016
Italy IVF is only allowed between married heterosexual couple.
Germany, Switzerland, Netherlands, and Austria all forbid the practice of using donor eggs. Surrogacy is also not allowed in those countries except for the Netherlands.

Yes, Catholics suck. Your point?

You suck, your point?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Catholic Church forbids IVF so many predominantly Catholic Countries either forbid IVF or have restrictions . Many other countries have a bunch of restrictions
Costa Rica banned IVF from 2000 to 2016
Italy IVF is only allowed between married heterosexual couple.
Germany, Switzerland, Netherlands, and Austria all forbid the practice of using donor eggs. Surrogacy is also not allowed in those countries except for the Netherlands.

Yes, Catholics suck. Your point?

You suck, your point?

I’m not out there practicing trying to oppress women.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Catholic Church forbids IVF so many predominantly Catholic Countries either forbid IVF or have restrictions . Many other countries have a bunch of restrictions
Costa Rica banned IVF from 2000 to 2016
Italy IVF is only allowed between married heterosexual couple.
Germany, Switzerland, Netherlands, and Austria all forbid the practice of using donor eggs. Surrogacy is also not allowed in those countries except for the Netherlands.

Yes, Catholics suck. Your point?

You suck, your point?

I’m not out there practicing trying to oppress women.

How is any of this oppressing women?

[Anonymous]

Presumably the plaintiffs in this case want to have children through IVF. Did they not understand what this outcome was going to be?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Catholic Church forbids IVF so many predominantly Catholic Countries either forbid IVF or have restrictions . Many other countries have a bunch of restrictions
Costa Rica banned IVF from 2000 to 2016
Italy IVF is only allowed between married heterosexual couple.
Germany, Switzerland, Netherlands, and Austria all forbid the practice of using donor eggs. Surrogacy is also not allowed in those countries except for the Netherlands.

Yes, Catholics suck. Your point?

You suck, your point?

I’m not out there practicing trying to oppress women.

Yes you are. You are opressing any person who has any thought or different opinion from yourself, which includes some women.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Presumably the plaintiffs in this case want to have children through IVF. Did they not understand what this outcome was going to be?

Terribly irony. Tragic.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Catholic Church forbids IVF so many predominantly Catholic Countries either forbid IVF or have restrictions . Many other countries have a bunch of restrictions
Costa Rica banned IVF from 2000 to 2016
Italy IVF is only allowed between married heterosexual couple.
Germany, Switzerland, Netherlands, and Austria all forbid the practice of using donor eggs. Surrogacy is also not allowed in those countries except for the Netherlands.

Yes, Catholics suck. Your point?

You suck, your point?

I’m not out there practicing trying to oppress women.

Yes you are. You are opressing any person who has any thought or different opinion from yourself, which includes some women.

You are welcome to think however you want. You are not welcome to make decisions for other women though.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Catholic Church forbids IVF so many predominantly Catholic Countries either forbid IVF or have restrictions . Many other countries have a bunch of restrictions
Costa Rica banned IVF from 2000 to 2016
Italy IVF is only allowed between married heterosexual couple.
Germany, Switzerland, Netherlands, and Austria all forbid the practice of using donor eggs. Surrogacy is also not allowed in those countries except for the Netherlands.

Yes, Catholics suck. Your point?

You suck, your point?

I’m not out there practicing trying to oppress women.

How is any of this oppressing women?

Catholics want to prevent women from controlling their own fertiiity/reproduction.

[Anonymous]

Citizens of Alabama got what they wanted when they elected these judges and the legislators who made the laws they’re enforcing. Boo hoo. Fewer Alabamans procreating is probably a good thing.

The only reason to care about this is the potential for this political cancer to spread.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:In this case, a staff member accidentally destroyed the embryos. What provider will want to take the risk of liability if something inadvertent happens to a person's embryos? What if the provider uses a procedure (maybe testing for genetic issues?) that damages the embryo? Can the provider be held liable for injuring a child?

Wouldn’t there already be a risk of lawsuit or possibly the center being shut down in this case?

A friend had a single embryo after ten years of trying. She would have been inconsolable if it was accidentally destroyed.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Citizens of Alabama got what they wanted when they elected these judges and the legislators who made the laws they’re enforcing. Boo hoo. Fewer Alabamans procreating is probably a good thing.

The only reason to care about this is the potential for this political cancer to spread.

Virtually guaranteed to spread, at this point.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Catholic Church forbids IVF so many predominantly Catholic Countries either forbid IVF or have restrictions . Many other countries have a bunch of restrictions
Costa Rica banned IVF from 2000 to 2016
Italy IVF is only allowed between married heterosexual couple.
Germany, Switzerland, Netherlands, and Austria all forbid the practice of using donor eggs. Surrogacy is also not allowed in those countries except for the Netherlands.

Yes, Catholics suck. Your point?

Except for the many, many politically pro-choice Catholics who understand the difference between personal religious views and the law of a peaceful land where religious views diverge widely.