IVF may soon end in Alabama

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Will women be required to have embryos implanted? If so, why not? I suppose they would authorize releasing them for adoption?

I have two kids from IVF and I'm very very very glad that I am all out of embryos.

You mean “transferred”?

Sure, sorry it's been awhile.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I am not religious whatsoever, but Ivf is morally and ethically wrong. On top of that, too many things wrong go wrong and women who do this are desperate and those who aren’t successful are basket cases.

There are millions of people that were conceived by IVF. One of them might save your sorry life one day.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Will women be required to have embryos implanted? If so, why not? I suppose they would authorize releasing them for adoption?

I have two kids from IVF and I'm very very very glad that I am all out of embryos.

You mean “transferred”?

Sure, sorry it's been awhile.

I mean, the PP isn’t entirely wrong….

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2019/nov/29/ohio-extreme-abortion-bill-reimplant-ectopic-pregnancy

Thr article mentions that it’s of course medically impossible, but it doesn’t mean they won’t try. In this case, apparently more than once!

[Anonymous]

IVF is no longer a revolutionary technology. The first IVF babies are now in their early 40's and are having children without the aid of IVF themselves.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Will women be required to have embryos implanted? If so, why not? I suppose they would authorize releasing them for adoption?

I have two kids from IVF and I'm very very very glad that I am all out of embryos.

You mean “transferred”?

Sure, sorry it's been awhile.

I mean, the PP isn’t entirely wrong….

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2019/nov/29/ohio-extreme-abortion-bill-reimplant-ectopic-pregnancy

Thr article mentions that it’s of course medically impossible, but it doesn’t mean they won’t try. In this case, apparently more than once!

This bill didn't pass, did it?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Will women be required to have embryos implanted? If so, why not? I suppose they would authorize releasing them for adoption?

I have two kids from IVF and I'm very very very glad that I am all out of embryos.

You mean “transferred”?

Sure, sorry it's been awhile.

I mean, the PP isn’t entirely wrong….

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2019/nov/29/ohio-extreme-abortion-bill-reimplant-ectopic-pregnancy

Thr article mentions that it’s of course medically impossible, but it doesn’t mean they won’t try. In this case, apparently more than once!

This bill didn't pass, did it?

No. That’s why I said it doesn’t mean they won’t try.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:IVF clinics in Alabama will have to shut down. I wonder what they will do with the thousands of embryos frozen in that state. Ship them to another state and have the parents pay for out-of-state storage? Would they be able to dispose of embryos that no one claims?

Ha become the opposite of a custody case - the families refusing to pay b/c they don't want the embryos and expected to destroy them, the clinics saying the families have to take them back and put them in their own freezers so they're not blamed or having to keep them frozen for free

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I am not religious whatsoever, but Ivf is morally and ethically wrong. On top of that, too many things wrong go wrong and women who do this are desperate and those who aren’t successful are basket cases.

There are millions of people that were conceived by IVF. One of them might save your sorry life one day.

One of them might end your sorry life one day.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:IVF clinics in Alabama will have to shut down. I wonder what they will do with the thousands of embryos frozen in that state. Ship them to another state and have the parents pay for out-of-state storage? Would they be able to dispose of embryos that no one claims?

Would that be human trafficking across state lines?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:If embryos are children, I don’t see how it could be legal to freeze and store them, let alone destroy them. Or even create them? There’s no chance ivf can be legal in Alabama I don’t think and have it make any sense. I think they’ve just been doing it illegally with no enforcement since they changed their constitution and now the court is just pointing out the obvious.

This is an excellent point.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Will women be required to have embryos implanted? If so, why not? I suppose they would authorize releasing them for adoption?

I have two kids from IVF and I'm very very very glad that I am all out of embryos.

You mean “transferred”?

Sure, sorry it's been awhile.

I mean, the PP isn’t entirely wrong….

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2019/nov/29/ohio-extreme-abortion-bill-reimplant-ectopic-pregnancy

Thr article mentions that it’s of course medically impossible, but it doesn’t mean they won’t try. In this case, apparently more than once!

More evidence that people who don't understand the female reproductive system should have no say in regulating it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If embryos are children, I don’t see how it could be legal to freeze and store them, let alone destroy them. Or even create them? There’s no chance ivf can be legal in Alabama I don’t think and have it make any sense. I think they’ve just been doing it illegally with no enforcement since they changed their constitution and now the court is just pointing out the obvious.

This is an excellent point.

That seems to be the logical conclusion. That it will be illegal to create embryos outside of the female reproductive system.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:IVF clinics in Alabama will have to shut down. I wonder what they will do with the thousands of embryos frozen in that state. Ship them to another state and have the parents pay for out-of-state storage? Would they be able to dispose of embryos that no one claims?

Ha become the opposite of a custody case - the families refusing to pay b/c they don't want the embryos and expected to destroy them, the clinics saying the families have to take them back and put them in their own freezers so they're not blamed or having to keep them frozen for free

Alabama has baby safe haven laws. Let the state pay to keep them frozen

[Anonymous]

I'm waiting for the first Habeas writ to be filed on behalf of a jailed embryo. Just because mom committed a crime doesn't mean the state can legally jail the children

[Anonymous]

Well, it's what a couple religious groups want, and they are imposing it on the rest of us.