Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Two words: bodily autonomy. I would never date a republican.
But a democrat Pfizer exec would be fine. My body, my choice, unless it’s sponsored by Pfizer
This makes no sense. Are you trying to make an anti-vax statement?
You can't claim to be the party of bodily autonomy while forcing people to put things into their bodies. NP
NP. These aren’t the same thing. When abortion is made illegal the source for the service goes away and women no longer have the legal right to make choices on their own behalf over their own bodies. In some states the desire is to make these restrictions absolute, with no exceptions. Women truly are denied the right to bodily autonomy.
Vaccination would be the same if it were truly compulsory: a forced injection. But vaccination policies (mostly? Always?) only require that one be vaccinated as a condition of employment or to use a service, and there are exemptions of various kinds for religious etc. reasons. Individuals still have the right to choose whether or not to be vaccinated, and have had to bear the social consequences of that choice, which is ethically reasonable. For students in public schools, “mandatory” vaccination and related laws have existed for decades, strongly suggesting that “mandatory” vaccination does not undermine freedom of consent.
LOL, starving people out to get them to vaccinate is the antithesis of freedom. Stopping citizens from free movement is a 4th amendment violation and hardly ethical.
And schools never required flu shots for students, because like covid, flu shot does not offer sterilizing immunity. You still get and transmit covid with the shot. How many times have you been boosted for Chickenpox? Probably never, because getting the virus once or one shot as a kid renders immunity. Not so with Covid.
So again, forcing people to put something in their body is taking away bodily autonomy. There is no two ways around it.