Republicans drafting bills to remove Biden from the ballot in GA, AZ, PA

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote: “Colorado radicals just changed the game and we are not going to sit quietly while they destroy our Republic. To be clear, our objective is to showcase the absurdity of Colorado’s decision and allow ALL candidates to be on the ballot in all states.”

Fair.

Not really. The grounds are baseless. The fact is, Trump "was engaged in an insurrection" - other than being a born American and over 35, those are the three requirements to be president. The GOP has zero grounds for this performative BS and all it does is further degrade our republic. So I guess in that sense it is on brand.

The GOP and Trump legal filings suggest Biden is immune presidentially for his actions and that Kamala Harris has the right to change the course of electoral college vote counting, so I suppose they should have at it next year.

I'm not a Trump fan but that is absolutely not a fact. It's an opinion. If he was convicted then you'd have a point. But he wasn't so you don't.

It is an opinion of a court after 5 days of testimony that wasn't disputed by either of the litigants. There is no constitutional requirement for a conviction.

An opinion of a kangaroo court. This will be overturned by the SC. In the meantime, Republicans who are far nastier are going to have Biden removed in a dozen states and they'll time it so that the appeals will happen after the election. This is a dumb move by the Democrats.

The plaintiffs were republicans you moron.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote: “Colorado radicals just changed the game and we are not going to sit quietly while they destroy our Republic. To be clear, our objective is to showcase the absurdity of Colorado’s decision and allow ALL candidates to be on the ballot in all states.”

Fair.

Not really. The grounds are baseless. The fact is, Trump "was engaged in an insurrection" - other than being a born American and over 35, those are the three requirements to be president. The GOP has zero grounds for this performative BS and all it does is further degrade our republic. So I guess in that sense it is on brand.

The GOP and Trump legal filings suggest Biden is immune presidentially for his actions and that Kamala Harris has the right to change the course of electoral college vote counting, so I suppose they should have at it next year.

I'm not a Trump fan but that is absolutely not a fact. It's an opinion. If he was convicted then you'd have a point. But he wasn't so you don't.

It is an opinion of a court after 5 days of testimony that wasn't disputed by either of the litigants. There is no constitutional requirement for a conviction.

An opinion of a kangaroo court. This will be overturned by the SC. In the meantime, Republicans who are far nastier are going to have Biden removed in a dozen states and they'll time it so that the appeals will happen after the election. This is a dumb move by the Democrats.

The Republicans who made the motion to get Trump off the Colorado ballot were not Democrats.

Republicans though are once again showing that they’re stupid, unserious people. And not only are they stupid, unserious people, they don’t have the attention span a cat has to track a laser pointer and they can’t follow a story.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote: “Colorado radicals just changed the game and we are not going to sit quietly while they destroy our Republic. To be clear, our objective is to showcase the absurdity of Colorado’s decision and allow ALL candidates to be on the ballot in all states.”

Fair.

Not really. The grounds are baseless. The fact is, Trump "was engaged in an insurrection" - other than being a born American and over 35, those are the three requirements to be president. The GOP has zero grounds for this performative BS and all it does is further degrade our republic. So I guess in that sense it is on brand.

The GOP and Trump legal filings suggest Biden is immune presidentially for his actions and that Kamala Harris has the right to change the course of electoral college vote counting, so I suppose they should have at it next year.

I'm not a Trump fan but that is absolutely not a fact. It's an opinion. If he was convicted then you'd have a point. But he wasn't so you don't.

It is an opinion of a court after 5 days of testimony that wasn't disputed by either of the litigants. There is no constitutional requirement for a conviction.

An opinion of a kangaroo court. This will be overturned by the SC. In the meantime, Republicans who are far nastier are going to have Biden removed in a dozen states and they'll time it so that the appeals will happen after the election. This is a dumb move by the Democrats.

The plaintiffs were republicans you moron.

The court is all Dems you moron.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote: “Colorado radicals just changed the game and we are not going to sit quietly while they destroy our Republic. To be clear, our objective is to showcase the absurdity of Colorado’s decision and allow ALL candidates to be on the ballot in all states.”

Fair.

Not really. The grounds are baseless. The fact is, Trump "was engaged in an insurrection" - other than being a born American and over 35, those are the three requirements to be president. The GOP has zero grounds for this performative BS and all it does is further degrade our republic. So I guess in that sense it is on brand.

The GOP and Trump legal filings suggest Biden is immune presidentially for his actions and that Kamala Harris has the right to change the course of electoral college vote counting, so I suppose they should have at it next year.

I'm not a Trump fan but that is absolutely not a fact. It's an opinion. If he was convicted then you'd have a point. But he wasn't so you don't.

It is an opinion of a court after 5 days of testimony that wasn't disputed by either of the litigants. There is no constitutional requirement for a conviction.

An opinion of a kangaroo court. This will be overturned by the SC. In the meantime, Republicans who are far nastier are going to have Biden removed in a dozen states and they'll time it so that the appeals will happen after the election. This is a dumb move by the Democrats.

The plaintiffs were republicans you moron.

The court is all Dems you moron.

There would't be a case if GOP plaintiffs hadn't filed for it.

The judges have been consistent in their application of the law. Or are you projecting what "republican" judges would have done differently? Because Judge Luttig, one of the most conservaitve jurists in the country, disagrees with you.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote: “Colorado radicals just changed the game and we are not going to sit quietly while they destroy our Republic. To be clear, our objective is to showcase the absurdity of Colorado’s decision and allow ALL candidates to be on the ballot in all states.”

Fair.

Not really. The grounds are baseless. The fact is, Trump "was engaged in an insurrection" - other than being a born American and over 35, those are the three requirements to be president. The GOP has zero grounds for this performative BS and all it does is further degrade our republic. So I guess in that sense it is on brand.

The GOP and Trump legal filings suggest Biden is immune presidentially for his actions and that Kamala Harris has the right to change the course of electoral college vote counting, so I suppose they should have at it next year.

I'm not a Trump fan but that is absolutely not a fact. It's an opinion. If he was convicted then you'd have a point. But he wasn't so you don't.

It is an opinion of a court after 5 days of testimony that wasn't disputed by either of the litigants. There is no constitutional requirement for a conviction.

An opinion of a kangaroo court. This will be overturned by the SC. In the meantime, Republicans who are far nastier are going to have Biden removed in a dozen states and they'll time it so that the appeals will happen after the election. This is a dumb move by the Democrats.

No one will be surprised when the corrupt republicans on the Supreme Court protect their own. That’s what Harlan Crowe pays them for.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote: “Colorado radicals just changed the game and we are not going to sit quietly while they destroy our Republic. To be clear, our objective is to showcase the absurdity of Colorado’s decision and allow ALL candidates to be on the ballot in all states.”

Fair.

Not really. The grounds are baseless. The fact is, Trump "was engaged in an insurrection" - other than being a born American and over 35, those are the three requirements to be president. The GOP has zero grounds for this performative BS and all it does is further degrade our republic. So I guess in that sense it is on brand.

The GOP and Trump legal filings suggest Biden is immune presidentially for his actions and that Kamala Harris has the right to change the course of electoral college vote counting, so I suppose they should have at it next year.

I'm not a Trump fan but that is absolutely not a fact. It's an opinion. If he was convicted then you'd have a point. But he wasn't so you don't.

It is an opinion of a court after 5 days of testimony that wasn't disputed by either of the litigants. There is no constitutional requirement for a conviction.

An opinion of a kangaroo court. This will be overturned by the SC. In the meantime, Republicans who are far nastier are going to have Biden removed in a dozen states and they'll time it so that the appeals will happen after the election. This is a dumb move by the Democrats.

The plaintiffs were republicans you moron.

The court is all Dems you moron.

There would't be a case if GOP plaintiffs hadn't filed for it.

The judges have been consistent in their application of the law. Or are you projecting what "republican" judges would have done differently? Because Judge Luttig, one of the most conservaitve jurists in the country, disagrees with you.

I'm a Democrat. But until Trump (who I can't stand) is actually convicted of insurrection, removing him from the ballot based on a state court ruling is ridiculous and sets terrible precedent. This will come back to bite Dems in the end.

[Anonymous]

I love how the progressives here were all like “hur, dur, we got drumpf off the ballot wooo hoo!” a few days ago but now the same people are all “hey no fair!” when other states start moving to take Biden off the ballot. It’s hilarious. Like 5 year olds.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I love how the progressives here were all like “hur, dur, we got drumpf off the ballot wooo hoo!” a few days ago but now the same people are all “hey no fair!” when other states start moving to take Biden off the ballot. It’s hilarious. Like 5 year olds.

Where do you see that? This whole thread is about Trump again. You really do see/say what you want to see while trying to re-invent truth.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote: “Colorado radicals just changed the game and we are not going to sit quietly while they destroy our Republic. To be clear, our objective is to showcase the absurdity of Colorado’s decision and allow ALL candidates to be on the ballot in all states.”

Fair.

Not really. The grounds are baseless. The fact is, Trump "was engaged in an insurrection" - other than being a born American and over 35, those are the three requirements to be president. The GOP has zero grounds for this performative BS and all it does is further degrade our republic. So I guess in that sense it is on brand.

The GOP and Trump legal filings suggest Biden is immune presidentially for his actions and that Kamala Harris has the right to change the course of electoral college vote counting, so I suppose they should have at it next year.

I'm not a Trump fan but that is absolutely not a fact. It's an opinion. If he was convicted then you'd have a point. But he wasn't so you don't.

It is an opinion of a court after 5 days of testimony that wasn't disputed by either of the litigants. There is no constitutional requirement for a conviction.

An opinion of a kangaroo court. This will be overturned by the SC. In the meantime, Republicans who are far nastier are going to have Biden removed in a dozen states and they'll time it so that the appeals will happen after the election. This is a dumb move by the Democrats.

The plaintiffs were republicans you moron.

The court is all Dems you moron.

There would't be a case if GOP plaintiffs hadn't filed for it.

The judges have been consistent in their application of the law. Or are you projecting what "republican" judges would have done differently? Because Judge Luttig, one of the most conservaitve jurists in the country, disagrees with you.

I'm a Democrat. But until Trump (who I can't stand) is actually convicted of insurrection, removing him from the ballot based on a state court ruling is ridiculous and sets terrible precedent. This will come back to bite Dems in the end.

But he’s absolutely immune from any criminal charges, remember?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote: “Colorado radicals just changed the game and we are not going to sit quietly while they destroy our Republic. To be clear, our objective is to showcase the absurdity of Colorado’s decision and allow ALL candidates to be on the ballot in all states.”

Fair.

Not really. The grounds are baseless. The fact is, Trump "was engaged in an insurrection" - other than being a born American and over 35, those are the three requirements to be president. The GOP has zero grounds for this performative BS and all it does is further degrade our republic. So I guess in that sense it is on brand.

The GOP and Trump legal filings suggest Biden is immune presidentially for his actions and that Kamala Harris has the right to change the course of electoral college vote counting, so I suppose they should have at it next year.

I'm not a Trump fan but that is absolutely not a fact. It's an opinion. If he was convicted then you'd have a point. But he wasn't so you don't.

It is an opinion of a court after 5 days of testimony that wasn't disputed by either of the litigants. There is no constitutional requirement for a conviction.

An opinion of a kangaroo court. This will be overturned by the SC. In the meantime, Republicans who are far nastier are going to have Biden removed in a dozen states and they'll time it so that the appeals will happen after the election. This is a dumb move by the Democrats.

The plaintiffs were republicans you moron.

The court is all Dems you moron.

There would't be a case if GOP plaintiffs hadn't filed for it.

The judges have been consistent in their application of the law. Or are you projecting what "republican" judges would have done differently? Because Judge Luttig, one of the most conservaitve jurists in the country, disagrees with you.

I'm a Democrat. But until Trump (who I can't stand) is actually convicted of insurrection, removing him from the ballot based on a state court ruling is ridiculous and sets terrible precedent. This will come back to bite Dems in the end.

But he’s absolutely immune from any criminal charges, remember?

What?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I love how the progressives here were all like “hur, dur, we got drumpf off the ballot wooo hoo!” a few days ago but now the same people are all “hey no fair!” when other states start moving to take Biden off the ballot. It’s hilarious. Like 5 year olds.

Because it’s stupid. They have no case against Biden. Trump disqualified himself by engaging in insurrection after he lost.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote: “Colorado radicals just changed the game and we are not going to sit quietly while they destroy our Republic. To be clear, our objective is to showcase the absurdity of Colorado’s decision and allow ALL candidates to be on the ballot in all states.”

Fair.

Not really. The grounds are baseless. The fact is, Trump "was engaged in an insurrection" - other than being a born American and over 35, those are the three requirements to be president. The GOP has zero grounds for this performative BS and all it does is further degrade our republic. So I guess in that sense it is on brand.

The GOP and Trump legal filings suggest Biden is immune presidentially for his actions and that Kamala Harris has the right to change the course of electoral college vote counting, so I suppose they should have at it next year.

I'm not a Trump fan but that is absolutely not a fact. It's an opinion. If he was convicted then you'd have a point. But he wasn't so you don't.

It is an opinion of a court after 5 days of testimony that wasn't disputed by either of the litigants. There is no constitutional requirement for a conviction.

An opinion of a kangaroo court. This will be overturned by the SC. In the meantime, Republicans who are far nastier are going to have Biden removed in a dozen states and they'll time it so that the appeals will happen after the election. This is a dumb move by the Democrats.

The plaintiffs were republicans you moron.

The court is all Dems you moron.

There would't be a case if GOP plaintiffs hadn't filed for it.

The judges have been consistent in their application of the law. Or are you projecting what "republican" judges would have done differently? Because Judge Luttig, one of the most conservaitve jurists in the country, disagrees with you.

I'm a Democrat. But until Trump (who I can't stand) is actually convicted of insurrection, removing him from the ballot based on a state court ruling is ridiculous and sets terrible precedent. This will come back to bite Dems in the end.

This is how every constitutional interpretation happens. A lower court conducts a trial and makes a ruling, it gets appealed, and if it is a new constitutional question it ends up at the US Supreme Court. Nothing starts in there. It has to start in a lower court somewhere.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I love how the progressives here were all like “hur, dur, we got drumpf off the ballot wooo hoo!” a few days ago but now the same people are all “hey no fair!” when other states start moving to take Biden off the ballot. It’s hilarious. Like 5 year olds.

Because it’s stupid. They have no case against Biden. Trump disqualified himself by engaging in insurrection after he lost.

Then why didn’t your bearded god-king Jack Smith charge him with insurrection?

Why didn’t the Senate convict him of insurrection after Nancy Pelosi impeached him (again)?


Because he didn’t engage in any insurrection. He asked the crowd “to peacefully and patriotically make their voices heard”. And that is not encouraging an insurrection. And your own dem senators and special counsel know it.


Meanwhile, there’s an insurrection happening on the Hill every other day now with pro-Hamas demonstrators shutting down proceedings and interfering with the work of congress, but that’s ok

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I love how the progressives here were all like “hur, dur, we got drumpf off the ballot wooo hoo!” a few days ago but now the same people are all “hey no fair!” when other states start moving to take Biden off the ballot. It’s hilarious. Like 5 year olds.

Because it’s stupid. They have no case against Biden. Trump disqualified himself by engaging in insurrection after he lost.

Then why didn’t your bearded god-king Jack Smith charge him with insurrection?

Why didn’t the Senate convict him of insurrection after Nancy Pelosi impeached him (again)?


Because he didn’t engage in any insurrection. He asked the crowd “to peacefully and patriotically make their voices heard”. And that is not encouraging an insurrection. And your own dem senators and special counsel know it.


Meanwhile, there’s an insurrection happening on the Hill every other day now with pro-Hamas demonstrators shutting down proceedings and interfering with the work of congress, but that’s ok

The Senate didn't rule against Trump with the 2/3 majority needed mostly because many in the GOP claimed it should be settled in the courts since Trump wasn't in office any longer. So here we are with the courts. What was your point again?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I love how the progressives here were all like “hur, dur, we got drumpf off the ballot wooo hoo!” a few days ago but now the same people are all “hey no fair!” when other states start moving to take Biden off the ballot. It’s hilarious. Like 5 year olds.

Because it’s stupid. They have no case against Biden. Trump disqualified himself by engaging in insurrection after he lost.

Then why didn’t your bearded god-king Jack Smith charge him with insurrection?

Why didn’t the Senate convict him of insurrection after Nancy Pelosi impeached him (again)?


Because he didn’t engage in any insurrection. He asked the crowd “to peacefully and patriotically make their voices heard”. And that is not encouraging an insurrection. And your own dem senators and special counsel know it.


Meanwhile, there’s an insurrection happening on the Hill every other day now with pro-Hamas demonstrators shutting down proceedings and interfering with the work of congress, but that’s ok

This congress has passed a grand total of 27 bills this year. They have already adjourned for the year. Suggesting some protestors are disrupting their business is laughable at best.