Republicans drafting bills to remove Biden from the ballot in GA, AZ, PA

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote: “Colorado radicals just changed the game and we are not going to sit quietly while they destroy our Republic. To be clear, our objective is to showcase the absurdity of Colorado’s decision and allow ALL candidates to be on the ballot in all states.”

Fair.

Not really. The grounds are baseless. The fact is, Trump "was engaged in an insurrection" - other than being a born American and over 35, those are the three requirements to be president. The GOP has zero grounds for this performative BS and all it does is further degrade our republic. So I guess in that sense it is on brand.

The GOP and Trump legal filings suggest Biden is immune presidentially for his actions and that Kamala Harris has the right to change the course of electoral college vote counting, so I suppose they should have at it next year.

I'm not a Trump fan but that is absolutely not a fact. It's an opinion. If he was convicted then you'd have a point. But he wasn't so you don't.

It’s not an opinion. It’s a factual determination by a court after a trial. By your standard, a conviction is just an opinion too.

What? He wasn't convicted of anything yet. What world are you living in? Ah right. The land of progressive make believe.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote: “Colorado radicals just changed the game and we are not going to sit quietly while they destroy our Republic. To be clear, our objective is to showcase the absurdity of Colorado’s decision and allow ALL candidates to be on the ballot in all states.”

Fair.

Not really. The grounds are baseless. The fact is, Trump "was engaged in an insurrection" - other than being a born American and over 35, those are the three requirements to be president. The GOP has zero grounds for this performative BS and all it does is further degrade our republic. So I guess in that sense it is on brand.

The GOP and Trump legal filings suggest Biden is immune presidentially for his actions and that Kamala Harris has the right to change the course of electoral college vote counting, so I suppose they should have at it next year.

I'm not a Trump fan but that is absolutely not a fact. It's an opinion. If he was convicted then you'd have a point. But he wasn't so you don't.

It’s not an opinion. It’s a factual determination by a court after a trial. By your standard, a conviction is just an opinion too.

What? He wasn't convicted of anything yet. What world are you living in? Ah right. The land of progressive make believe.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote: “Colorado radicals just changed the game and we are not going to sit quietly while they destroy our Republic. To be clear, our objective is to showcase the absurdity of Colorado’s decision and allow ALL candidates to be on the ballot in all states.”

Fair.

Not really. The grounds are baseless. The fact is, Trump "was engaged in an insurrection" - other than being a born American and over 35, those are the three requirements to be president. The GOP has zero grounds for this performative BS and all it does is further degrade our republic. So I guess in that sense it is on brand.

The GOP and Trump legal filings suggest Biden is immune presidentially for his actions and that Kamala Harris has the right to change the course of electoral college vote counting, so I suppose they should have at it next year.

I'm not a Trump fan but that is absolutely not a fact. It's an opinion. If he was convicted then you'd have a point. But he wasn't so you don't.

It’s not an opinion. It’s a factual determination by a court after a trial. By your standard, a conviction is just an opinion too.

What? He wasn't convicted of anything yet. What world are you living in? Ah right. The land of progressive make believe.

Do you have reading comprehension problems? No one said he was convicted. A court determined he engaged in insurrection after holding a trial where Trump was represented and allowed to present and challenge evidence.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote: “Colorado radicals just changed the game and we are not going to sit quietly while they destroy our Republic. To be clear, our objective is to showcase the absurdity of Colorado’s decision and allow ALL candidates to be on the ballot in all states.”

Fair.

Not really. The grounds are baseless. The fact is, Trump "was engaged in an insurrection" - other than being a born American and over 35, those are the three requirements to be president. The GOP has zero grounds for this performative BS and all it does is further degrade our republic. So I guess in that sense it is on brand.

The GOP and Trump legal filings suggest Biden is immune presidentially for his actions and that Kamala Harris has the right to change the course of electoral college vote counting, so I suppose they should have at it next year.

I'm not a Trump fan but that is absolutely not a fact. It's an opinion. If he was convicted then you'd have a point. But he wasn't so you don't.

It’s not an opinion. It’s a factual determination by a court after a trial. By your standard, a conviction is just an opinion too.

What? He wasn't convicted of anything yet. What world are you living in? Ah right. The land of progressive make believe.

Do you have reading comprehension problems? No one said he was convicted. A court determined he engaged in insurrection after holding a trial where Trump was represented and allowed to present and challenge evidence.

Really! When is he going to jail?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote: “Colorado radicals just changed the game and we are not going to sit quietly while they destroy our Republic. To be clear, our objective is to showcase the absurdity of Colorado’s decision and allow ALL candidates to be on the ballot in all states.”

Fair.

Perfect indeed

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote: “Colorado radicals just changed the game and we are not going to sit quietly while they destroy our Republic. To be clear, our objective is to showcase the absurdity of Colorado’s decision and allow ALL candidates to be on the ballot in all states.”

Fair.

Not really. The grounds are baseless. The fact is, Trump "was engaged in an insurrection" - other than being a born American and over 35, those are the three requirements to be president. The GOP has zero grounds for this performative BS and all it does is further degrade our republic. So I guess in that sense it is on brand.

The GOP and Trump legal filings suggest Biden is immune presidentially for his actions and that Kamala Harris has the right to change the course of electoral college vote counting, so I suppose they should have at it next year.

I'm not a Trump fan but that is absolutely not a fact. It's an opinion. If he was convicted then you'd have a point. But he wasn't so you don't.

It’s not an opinion. It’s a factual determination by a court after a trial. By your standard, a conviction is just an opinion too.

What? He wasn't convicted of anything yet. What world are you living in? Ah right. The land of progressive make believe.

Maybe Congress will pass an Amendment to make a conviction relevant. Probably not, though.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote: “Colorado radicals just changed the game and we are not going to sit quietly while they destroy our Republic. To be clear, our objective is to showcase the absurdity of Colorado’s decision and allow ALL candidates to be on the ballot in all states.”

Fair.

Perfect indeed

We’ll see. The Republicans are due for an election-related court win one of these years.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote: “Colorado radicals just changed the game and we are not going to sit quietly while they destroy our Republic. To be clear, our objective is to showcase the absurdity of Colorado’s decision and allow ALL candidates to be on the ballot in all states.”

Fair.

Not really. The grounds are baseless. The fact is, Trump "was engaged in an insurrection" - other than being a born American and over 35, those are the three requirements to be president. The GOP has zero grounds for this performative BS and all it does is further degrade our republic. So I guess in that sense it is on brand.

The GOP and Trump legal filings suggest Biden is immune presidentially for his actions and that Kamala Harris has the right to change the course of electoral college vote counting, so I suppose they should have at it next year.

I'm not a Trump fan but that is absolutely not a fact. It's an opinion. If he was convicted then you'd have a point. But he wasn't so you don't.

It’s not an opinion. It’s a factual determination by a court after a trial. By your standard, a conviction is just an opinion too.

What? He wasn't convicted of anything yet. What world are you living in? Ah right. The land of progressive make believe.

Do you have reading comprehension problems? No one said he was convicted. A court determined he engaged in insurrection after holding a trial where Trump was represented and allowed to present and challenge evidence.

What court?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote: “Colorado radicals just changed the game and we are not going to sit quietly while they destroy our Republic. To be clear, our objective is to showcase the absurdity of Colorado’s decision and allow ALL candidates to be on the ballot in all states.”

Fair.

Not really. The grounds are baseless. The fact is, Trump "was engaged in an insurrection" - other than being a born American and over 35, those are the three requirements to be president. The GOP has zero grounds for this performative BS and all it does is further degrade our republic. So I guess in that sense it is on brand.

The GOP and Trump legal filings suggest Biden is immune presidentially for his actions and that Kamala Harris has the right to change the course of electoral college vote counting, so I suppose they should have at it next year.

I'm not a Trump fan but that is absolutely not a fact. It's an opinion. If he was convicted then you'd have a point. But he wasn't so you don't.

It’s not an opinion. It’s a factual determination by a court after a trial. By your standard, a conviction is just an opinion too.

What? He wasn't convicted of anything yet. What world are you living in? Ah right. The land of progressive make believe.

Do you have reading comprehension problems? No one said he was convicted. A court determined he engaged in insurrection after holding a trial where Trump was represented and allowed to present and challenge evidence.

What court?

Are you people really this uninformed?

https://www.nytimes.com/2023/12/19/us/politics/trump-colorado-ballot-14th-amendment.html

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote: “Colorado radicals just changed the game and we are not going to sit quietly while they destroy our Republic. To be clear, our objective is to showcase the absurdity of Colorado’s decision and allow ALL candidates to be on the ballot in all states.”

Fair.

Not really. The grounds are baseless. The fact is, Trump "was engaged in an insurrection" - other than being a born American and over 35, those are the three requirements to be president. The GOP has zero grounds for this performative BS and all it does is further degrade our republic. So I guess in that sense it is on brand.

The GOP and Trump legal filings suggest Biden is immune presidentially for his actions and that Kamala Harris has the right to change the course of electoral college vote counting, so I suppose they should have at it next year.

I'm not a Trump fan but that is absolutely not a fact. It's an opinion. If he was convicted then you'd have a point. But he wasn't so you don't.

It’s not an opinion. It’s a factual determination by a court after a trial. By your standard, a conviction is just an opinion too.

What? He wasn't convicted of anything yet. What world are you living in? Ah right. The land of progressive make believe.

Do you have reading comprehension problems? No one said he was convicted. A court determined he engaged in insurrection after holding a trial where Trump was represented and allowed to present and challenge evidence.

What court?

Are you people really this uninformed?

https://www.nytimes.com/2023/12/19/us/politics/trump-colorado-ballot-14th-amendment.html

That's what I thought, you were referring to CO's kangaroo court. The SC will overturn this. At least we better hope they do or Republicans will do the same thing to Biden as this thread shows.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote: “Colorado radicals just changed the game and we are not going to sit quietly while they destroy our Republic. To be clear, our objective is to showcase the absurdity of Colorado’s decision and allow ALL candidates to be on the ballot in all states.”

Fair.

Not really. The grounds are baseless. The fact is, Trump "was engaged in an insurrection" - other than being a born American and over 35, those are the three requirements to be president. The GOP has zero grounds for this performative BS and all it does is further degrade our republic. So I guess in that sense it is on brand.

The GOP and Trump legal filings suggest Biden is immune presidentially for his actions and that Kamala Harris has the right to change the course of electoral college vote counting, so I suppose they should have at it next year.

I'm not a Trump fan but that is absolutely not a fact. It's an opinion. If he was convicted then you'd have a point. But he wasn't so you don't.

It’s not an opinion. It’s a factual determination by a court after a trial. By your standard, a conviction is just an opinion too.

What? He wasn't convicted of anything yet. What world are you living in? Ah right. The land of progressive make believe.

Do you have reading comprehension problems? No one said he was convicted. A court determined he engaged in insurrection after holding a trial where Trump was represented and allowed to present and challenge evidence.

What court?

Are you people really this uninformed?

https://www.nytimes.com/2023/12/19/us/politics/trump-colorado-ballot-14th-amendment.html

That's what I thought, you were referring to CO's kangaroo court. The SC will overturn this. At least we better hope they do or Republicans will do the same thing to Biden as this thread shows.

It’s remarkable how Trump breaks everything he touches.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote: “Colorado radicals just changed the game and we are not going to sit quietly while they destroy our Republic. To be clear, our objective is to showcase the absurdity of Colorado’s decision and allow ALL candidates to be on the ballot in all states.”

Fair.

Not really. The grounds are baseless. The fact is, Trump "was engaged in an insurrection" - other than being a born American and over 35, those are the three requirements to be president. The GOP has zero grounds for this performative BS and all it does is further degrade our republic. So I guess in that sense it is on brand.

The GOP and Trump legal filings suggest Biden is immune presidentially for his actions and that Kamala Harris has the right to change the course of electoral college vote counting, so I suppose they should have at it next year.

I'm not a Trump fan but that is absolutely not a fact. It's an opinion. If he was convicted then you'd have a point. But he wasn't so you don't.

It’s not an opinion. It’s a factual determination by a court after a trial. By your standard, a conviction is just an opinion too.

What? He wasn't convicted of anything yet. What world are you living in? Ah right. The land of progressive make believe.

Do you have reading comprehension problems? No one said he was convicted. A court determined he engaged in insurrection after holding a trial where Trump was represented and allowed to present and challenge evidence.

What court?

Are you people really this uninformed?

https://www.nytimes.com/2023/12/19/us/politics/trump-colorado-ballot-14th-amendment.html

That's what I thought, you were referring to CO's kangaroo court. The SC will overturn this. At least we better hope they do or Republicans will do the same thing to Biden as this thread shows.

It’s remarkable how Trump breaks everything he touches.

What?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote: “Colorado radicals just changed the game and we are not going to sit quietly while they destroy our Republic. To be clear, our objective is to showcase the absurdity of Colorado’s decision and allow ALL candidates to be on the ballot in all states.”

Fair.

Not really. The grounds are baseless. The fact is, Trump "was engaged in an insurrection" - other than being a born American and over 35, those are the three requirements to be president. The GOP has zero grounds for this performative BS and all it does is further degrade our republic. So I guess in that sense it is on brand.

The GOP and Trump legal filings suggest Biden is immune presidentially for his actions and that Kamala Harris has the right to change the course of electoral college vote counting, so I suppose they should have at it next year.

I'm not a Trump fan but that is absolutely not a fact. It's an opinion. If he was convicted then you'd have a point. But he wasn't so you don't.

It’s not an opinion. It’s a factual determination by a court after a trial. By your standard, a conviction is just an opinion too.

What? He wasn't convicted of anything yet. What world are you living in? Ah right. The land of progressive make believe.

+1

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I would prefer we just moot the issue entirely by convicting Trump of insurrection and hanging him before the next election. But the Constitution does provide an alternative. Insurrection is an absolute bar.

You can explain that to the Secret Service agents when they visit you.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote: “Colorado radicals just changed the game and we are not going to sit quietly while they destroy our Republic. To be clear, our objective is to showcase the absurdity of Colorado’s decision and allow ALL candidates to be on the ballot in all states.”

Fair.

Not really. The grounds are baseless. The fact is, Trump "was engaged in an insurrection" - other than being a born American and over 35, those are the three requirements to be president. The GOP has zero grounds for this performative BS and all it does is further degrade our republic. So I guess in that sense it is on brand.

The GOP and Trump legal filings suggest Biden is immune presidentially for his actions and that Kamala Harris has the right to change the course of electoral college vote counting, so I suppose they should have at it next year.

I'm not a Trump fan but that is absolutely not a fact. It's an opinion. If he was convicted then you'd have a point. But he wasn't so you don't.

It’s not an opinion. It’s a factual determination by a court after a trial. By your standard, a conviction is just an opinion too.

What? He wasn't convicted of anything yet. What world are you living in? Ah right. The land of progressive make believe.

Do you have reading comprehension problems? No one said he was convicted. A court determined he engaged in insurrection after holding a trial where Trump was represented and allowed to present and challenge evidence.

What court?

Are you people really this uninformed?

https://www.nytimes.com/2023/12/19/us/politics/trump-colorado-ballot-14th-amendment.html

That's what I thought, you were referring to CO's kangaroo court. The SC will overturn this. At least we better hope they do or Republicans will do the same thing to Biden as this thread shows.

It’s remarkable how Trump breaks everything he touches.

What?

Trump. He breaks everything he touches.