Republicans drafting bills to remove Biden from the ballot in GA, AZ, PA

[Anonymous]

This probably needs to happen.


Not securing our border and failing to enforce federal law with regards to what amounts to an ongoing invasion is impeachment-worthy, and just as serious as the charges Trump is accused of.

Really it might be the best way to remove BOTH of them from the ballot next year and have a fresh contest between two younger and newer candidates.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Ridiculous.

https://www.stateofunion.org/2023/12/23/republicans-drafting-bills-to-remove-joe-biden-from-ballots-in-georgia-arizona-pennsylvania-2/

Democrats could have focused on winning elections

But they chose to focus on importing millions of illegal aliens

No US worker should ever vote democrat

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This probably needs to happen.


Not securing our border and failing to enforce federal law with regards to what amounts to an ongoing invasion is impeachment-worthy, and just as serious as the charges Trump is accused of.

Really it might be the best way to remove BOTH of them from the ballot next year and have a fresh contest between two younger and newer candidates.

Oh good. BoThSiDeS. On the one hand you have right wing lies, and on the other hand the man and the party that want to end democracy. Samesies.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ridiculous.

https://www.stateofunion.org/2023/12/23/republicans-drafting-bills-to-remove-joe-biden-from-ballots-in-georgia-arizona-pennsylvania-2/

Democrats could have focused on winning elections

But they chose to focus on importing millions of illegal aliens

No US worker should ever vote democrat

Thanks, Fox bot.

[Anonymous]

Where is Colorado due process now?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ridiculous.

https://www.stateofunion.org/2023/12/23/republicans-drafting-bills-to-remove-joe-biden-from-ballots-in-georgia-arizona-pennsylvania-2/

Democrats could have focused on winning elections

But they chose to focus on importing millions of illegal aliens

No US worker should ever vote democrat

Thanks, Fox bot.

Name your source for this claim.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote: “Colorado radicals just changed the game and we are not going to sit quietly while they destroy our Republic. To be clear, our objective is to showcase the absurdity of Colorado’s decision and allow ALL candidates to be on the ballot in all states.”

Fair.

Not really. The grounds are baseless. The fact is, Trump "was engaged in an insurrection" - other than being a born American and over 35, those are the three requirements to be president. The GOP has zero grounds for this performative BS and all it does is further degrade our republic. So I guess in that sense it is on brand.

The GOP and Trump legal filings suggest Biden is immune presidentially for his actions and that Kamala Harris has the right to change the course of electoral college vote counting, so I suppose they should have at it next year.

I'm not a Trump fan but that is absolutely not a fact. It's an opinion. If he was convicted then you'd have a point. But he wasn't so you don't.

It’s not an opinion. It’s a factual determination by a court after a trial. By your standard, a conviction is just an opinion too.

What? He wasn't convicted of anything yet. What world are you living in? Ah right. The land of progressive make believe.

Do you have reading comprehension problems? No one said he was convicted. A court determined he engaged in insurrection after holding a trial where Trump was represented and allowed to present and challenge evidence.

What court?

Are you people really this uninformed?

https://www.nytimes.com/2023/12/19/us/politics/trump-colorado-ballot-14th-amendment.html

That's what I thought, you were referring to CO's kangaroo court. The SC will overturn this. At least we better hope they do or Republicans will do the same thing to Biden as this thread shows.

It’s remarkable how Trump breaks everything he touches.

What?

Trump. He breaks everything he touches.

And that relates to this discussion how?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote: “Colorado radicals just changed the game and we are not going to sit quietly while they destroy our Republic. To be clear, our objective is to showcase the absurdity of Colorado’s decision and allow ALL candidates to be on the ballot in all states.”

Fair.

Not really. The grounds are baseless. The fact is, Trump "was engaged in an insurrection" - other than being a born American and over 35, those are the three requirements to be president. The GOP has zero grounds for this performative BS and all it does is further degrade our republic. So I guess in that sense it is on brand.

The GOP and Trump legal filings suggest Biden is immune presidentially for his actions and that Kamala Harris has the right to change the course of electoral college vote counting, so I suppose they should have at it next year.

I'm not a Trump fan but that is absolutely not a fact. It's an opinion. If he was convicted then you'd have a point. But he wasn't so you don't.

It is an opinion of a court after 5 days of testimony that wasn't disputed by either of the litigants. There is no constitutional requirement for a conviction.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote: “Colorado radicals just changed the game and we are not going to sit quietly while they destroy our Republic. To be clear, our objective is to showcase the absurdity of Colorado’s decision and allow ALL candidates to be on the ballot in all states.”

Fair.

Not really. The grounds are baseless. The fact is, Trump "was engaged in an insurrection" - other than being a born American and over 35, those are the three requirements to be president. The GOP has zero grounds for this performative BS and all it does is further degrade our republic. So I guess in that sense it is on brand.

The GOP and Trump legal filings suggest Biden is immune presidentially for his actions and that Kamala Harris has the right to change the course of electoral college vote counting, so I suppose they should have at it next year.

I'm not a Trump fan but that is absolutely not a fact. It's an opinion. If he was convicted then you'd have a point. But he wasn't so you don't.

It’s not an opinion. It’s a factual determination by a court after a trial. By your standard, a conviction is just an opinion too.

What? He wasn't convicted of anything yet. What world are you living in? Ah right. The land of progressive make believe.

Do you have reading comprehension problems? No one said he was convicted. A court determined he engaged in insurrection after holding a trial where Trump was represented and allowed to present and challenge evidence.

Really! When is he going to jail?

It wasn't a criminal proceeding. It was a proceeding to determine eligiiblity to appear on a ballot. Please keep up.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote: “Colorado radicals just changed the game and we are not going to sit quietly while they destroy our Republic. To be clear, our objective is to showcase the absurdity of Colorado’s decision and allow ALL candidates to be on the ballot in all states.”

Fair.

Not really. The grounds are baseless. The fact is, Trump "was engaged in an insurrection" - other than being a born American and over 35, those are the three requirements to be president. The GOP has zero grounds for this performative BS and all it does is further degrade our republic. So I guess in that sense it is on brand.

The GOP and Trump legal filings suggest Biden is immune presidentially for his actions and that Kamala Harris has the right to change the course of electoral college vote counting, so I suppose they should have at it next year.

I'm not a Trump fan but that is absolutely not a fact. It's an opinion. If he was convicted then you'd have a point. But he wasn't so you don't.

It’s not an opinion. It’s a factual determination by a court after a trial. By your standard, a conviction is just an opinion too.

What? He wasn't convicted of anything yet. What world are you living in? Ah right. The land of progressive make believe.

Do you have reading comprehension problems? No one said he was convicted. A court determined he engaged in insurrection after holding a trial where Trump was represented and allowed to present and challenge evidence.

What court?

Colorado court system including the state's supreme court.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote: “Colorado radicals just changed the game and we are not going to sit quietly while they destroy our Republic. To be clear, our objective is to showcase the absurdity of Colorado’s decision and allow ALL candidates to be on the ballot in all states.”

Fair.

Not really. The grounds are baseless. The fact is, Trump "was engaged in an insurrection" - other than being a born American and over 35, those are the three requirements to be president. The GOP has zero grounds for this performative BS and all it does is further degrade our republic. So I guess in that sense it is on brand.

The GOP and Trump legal filings suggest Biden is immune presidentially for his actions and that Kamala Harris has the right to change the course of electoral college vote counting, so I suppose they should have at it next year.

I'm not a Trump fan but that is absolutely not a fact. It's an opinion. If he was convicted then you'd have a point. But he wasn't so you don't.

It is an opinion of a court after 5 days of testimony that wasn't disputed by either of the litigants. There is no constitutional requirement for a conviction.

An opinion of a kangaroo court. This will be overturned by the SC. In the meantime, Republicans who are far nastier are going to have Biden removed in a dozen states and they'll time it so that the appeals will happen after the election. This is a dumb move by the Democrats.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote: “Colorado radicals just changed the game and we are not going to sit quietly while they destroy our Republic. To be clear, our objective is to showcase the absurdity of Colorado’s decision and allow ALL candidates to be on the ballot in all states.”

Fair.

Not really. The grounds are baseless. The fact is, Trump "was engaged in an insurrection" - other than being a born American and over 35, those are the three requirements to be president. The GOP has zero grounds for this performative BS and all it does is further degrade our republic. So I guess in that sense it is on brand.

The GOP and Trump legal filings suggest Biden is immune presidentially for his actions and that Kamala Harris has the right to change the course of electoral college vote counting, so I suppose they should have at it next year.

I'm not a Trump fan but that is absolutely not a fact. It's an opinion. If he was convicted then you'd have a point. But he wasn't so you don't.

It’s not an opinion. It’s a factual determination by a court after a trial. By your standard, a conviction is just an opinion too.

What? He wasn't convicted of anything yet. What world are you living in? Ah right. The land of progressive make believe.

Do you have reading comprehension problems? No one said he was convicted. A court determined he engaged in insurrection after holding a trial where Trump was represented and allowed to present and challenge evidence.

What court?

Are you people really this uninformed?

https://www.nytimes.com/2023/12/19/us/politics/trump-colorado-ballot-14th-amendment.html

That's what I thought, you were referring to CO's kangaroo court. The SC will overturn this. At least we better hope they do or Republicans will do the same thing to Biden as this thread shows.

There is no precedent basis by which the supreme court would overturn a state supreme court decision of this matter. SCOTUS has sided with state supreme court in voting matters pretty consistently from Bush v Gore to various Voting Rights Acts and political boundary cases for the past 24 years.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This probably needs to happen.


Not securing our border and failing to enforce federal law with regards to what amounts to an ongoing invasion is impeachment-worthy, and just as serious as the charges Trump is accused of.

Really it might be the best way to remove BOTH of them from the ballot next year and have a fresh contest between two younger and newer candidates.

Then you should have held every president accountable for the past 160 years.

Really this is just a stupid exercise in idiocracy.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Where is Colorado due process now?

It happened during the various court cases where Trump had representation and opportunity to cross examine witnesses and provide his own testimony.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote: “Colorado radicals just changed the game and we are not going to sit quietly while they destroy our Republic. To be clear, our objective is to showcase the absurdity of Colorado’s decision and allow ALL candidates to be on the ballot in all states.”

Fair.

Not really. The grounds are baseless. The fact is, Trump "was engaged in an insurrection" - other than being a born American and over 35, those are the three requirements to be president. The GOP has zero grounds for this performative BS and all it does is further degrade our republic. So I guess in that sense it is on brand.

The GOP and Trump legal filings suggest Biden is immune presidentially for his actions and that Kamala Harris has the right to change the course of electoral college vote counting, so I suppose they should have at it next year.

I'm not a Trump fan but that is absolutely not a fact. It's an opinion. If he was convicted then you'd have a point. But he wasn't so you don't.

It’s not an opinion. It’s a factual determination by a court after a trial. By your standard, a conviction is just an opinion too.

What? He wasn't convicted of anything yet. What world are you living in? Ah right. The land of progressive make believe.

Do you have reading comprehension problems? No one said he was convicted. A court determined he engaged in insurrection after holding a trial where Trump was represented and allowed to present and challenge evidence.

What court?

Are you people really this uninformed?

https://www.nytimes.com/2023/12/19/us/politics/trump-colorado-ballot-14th-amendment.html

That's what I thought, you were referring to CO's kangaroo court. The SC will overturn this. At least we better hope they do or Republicans will do the same thing to Biden as this thread shows.

It was a civil law trial because eligibility of office is a civil law question. The District Court in Colorado conducted a thorough trial.