
I like Harry more after watching this, for walking away from that stuff |
+1 yes. In their older years, I think many millenials will realize at what cost. |
The BRF just doesn’t know how to deal with younger siblings who won’t inherit the title. Look at Margaret, Andrew, Harry. All of the focus is on those who will wear the Crown. The others aren’t allowed to have real jobs, live independently and earn their own money, or choose their own path due to how it would reflect on The Crown. What an awful way to live. Like birds in a gilded cage.
I can understand why Harry and Megan left. |
This. 👆🏽👆🏽 |
They felt betrayed by the BRF, fed to the tabloids wolves and traumatized by the experience. They need money for security and they receive death threats. They have a need to tell their story. I would do the same to and feel very lucky that I get paid for doing it! |
I can understand why they left. It's just sad that they can't find another way to earn money other than criticizing his family. |
If Harry no longer wishes to have a relationship with his father, brother and other family members, then I suppose he's made his choice. Why doesn't he give up his title as well and any money he may have received from the royal family? |
I was close to my father as a child and teenager. I was not close with him in my 20s and am currently in my 30s where our relationship is mainly sustained by the fact that I want my son to know who he is. He is great with young kids not so much when you have your own life and opinions. We talk irregularly and I only visit him when we visit that side of the family. I still love my father. I would be devastated if he choose to engage in the very type of deceit that the British press engages in. |
She is a better actress than I originally thought. |
One thing that struck me: Harry said everything went south after their Aussie tour. That it was jealousy that drove Will's office to put out negative stories about M.
Maybe. But I can't help thinking that it's the knee jerk response to someone not liking you, by blaming it on jealousy. It's hard to prove, and it is one sided. |
They dont need to though. He got 14 million from Diana, $10 from the Queen mother, she had income prior to being his wife. I would assume their main need for money is security. They are in the public eye whether they want to be or not. They just want to control it. Many celebrities do the same thing but they are famous (in many peoples mind) because they did something not because of who their parents/family are but that is plainly not true as 75% or more of the current celebrities are related to other celebrities or people within the industry. |
YES. I guess it was the 3rd episode where they went into a detailed discussion about her family and the whole wedding debacle, but rather than explain more, I really now have even more questions. It is very curious that Harry never met her father before the wedding (this was known before the documentary I believe) and even more curious to me that none of her mother's family came to the wedding. I came from a small nuclear family and did not have a lot of ties to my extended family, but I still had to invite all manner of cousins, aunts, uncles etc. that I barely knew to my wedding. They were my parents' guests. I feel for Meghan. Her half-sister seems to have some mental health issues. I would not have mentioned her at all in the documentary. What they said is just going to enrage her more. She clearly romanticized what being part of a large, "close" family would be like. If you are used to coming from a smaller family without a lot of extended family ties, the whole larger family expectations and obligations can be a rude awakening. It was for me when I married into my husband's large, close family. I still have resentments 20+ years into my marriage! |
+1. And she was what, part of the family for a year before she left? And she’s going to make a career of bashing them? It’s opportunistic and gross. I don’t think the royal family is comprised of saints either. |
It’s not *that* hard to prove, it would just take a neutral party with a lot of time to look at the headlines in the aggregate and see when things “turned” for Meghan and Harry. |
That family has always been dysfunctional
Queen came across as cold even to Charles when he was young. Charles always was awkward, nerdy boring type of a man Perhaps he realized Camilla wouldn’t fit the royal mold and pleased his parents by marrying Diana and producing BOYS Obviously Harry is protective about his kids, obviously everything you read in the press is not true, obviously they learned from the mistake of letting Diana be popular Obviously Harry did not step down without very strong reasons to do so I am not surprised that they feel compelled to have to answer for their actions Everything with the royal family is propaganda He didn’t really say anything really bad about his family. There have been worse tell alls by Diana, Fergie and the rest Obviously any bad press about Meghan protects Andrew and the rest. Charles has built a massive fortune and cannot be investigated for embezzlement The whole thing is a smokescreen Unfortunately the royal family missed an opportunity to modernize itself What I do not know is how the British public bought into this wicked witch from the west story |