Harry and Meghan on Netflix episodes for five and six positivity and friendly comments only please

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The British monarchy is over 1,000 years old. Harry must know that and the way it’s run. He doesn’t seem very bright- nazi uniform, did poorly in school, called Pakistani soldier a racist name. He has just burned bridges with all his extended relatives for money. He will regret it one day when his kids have no connection at all with Britain and he is a pariah there.


I think he is happy to relive himself of any connection to the Royal family.


He is only famous because he is connected to the royal family. Without that he is just a shmuck who would never ever be asked his opinion, or put in any position of power. He is biting the hand that feeds him. His kids will no longer be connected to the royal family. He’s taking away that option for them. Completely short sided.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:And even that question was normal. Real life mixed race couples (like my family!!!) can attest than wondering if a child will be fair like one parent or dark like another is NORMAL. We have many friends where a grandparent was sad to see how dark the kid turned out bc she was excited to have a fair skinned grandchild finally. No one thought she was racist!!! This is cultural and much deeper than race (these were both Latino families in this case). MeMe was thrilled to have something to complain about, 100 percent sure her parents wondered who she would most favor before she was born. All of it is a lie just like everything she does.


Wow, she takes up a lot of space in your head.

How do you know she lies about everything? Did William tell you that first hand? Were you at the royal events?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The British monarchy is over 1,000 years old. Harry must know that and the way it’s run. He doesn’t seem very bright- nazi uniform, did poorly in school, called Pakistani soldier a racist name. He has just burned bridges with all his extended relatives for money. He will regret it one day when his kids have no connection at all with Britain and he is a pariah there.


I think he is happy to relive himself of any connection to the Royal family.


He is only famous because he is connected to the royal family. Without that he is just a shmuck who would never ever be asked his opinion, or put in any position of power. He is biting the hand that feeds him. His kids will no longer be connected to the royal family. He’s taking away that option for them. Completely short sided.



Not if that is what he wants. And it seems like he does.

There are lots of "schmucks" who are nothing without family connections. So what?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I think they could have quietly left the family and lived out their life privately in CA without Oprah and Netflix. She is very pretty and has nice hair, but that is basically it. There's nothing special about them and now that they've aired their grievances they really should just disappear for a bit and focus on their charities.


While I agree with this, people and tabloids and news will continue to talk about them and find multitudes of reasons for outrage every. Single. Day. So it doesn’t really matter what they actually do, people will still have the perception that they’re everywhere constantly and that they’re in the public limelight.

You can’t win in their position.


You can if you just take the high road and stop talking ad nauseum about your in-laws.


They shouldn't have to take the high road. It's also not winning anything for them by doing so. So good for them for putting their side out there. I'd do the same.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The British monarchy is over 1,000 years old. Harry must know that and the way it’s run. He doesn’t seem very bright- nazi uniform, did poorly in school, called Pakistani soldier a racist name. He has just burned bridges with all his extended relatives for money. He will regret it one day when his kids have no connection at all with Britain and he is a pariah there.


I think he is happy to relive himself of any connection to the Royal family.


He is only famous because he is connected to the royal family. Without that he is just a shmuck who would never ever be asked his opinion, or put in any position of power. He is biting the hand that feeds him. His kids will no longer be connected to the royal family. He’s taking away that option for them. Completely short sided.



Not if that is what he wants. And it seems like he does.

There are lots of "schmucks" who are nothing without family connections. So what?


They don't expect $100m from Netflix and put out silly pieces like this to earn it. That's what.
Anonymous
Meghan is a well-educated woman who was in her mid 30s when she became involved with Harry. She also had a career in Hollywood. With access to the internet, tell all books, etc, this idea that she was an angelic, naive young woman is ridiculous. I’m sympathetic to Di precisely because she was 19, not well educated, and really not worldly when Charles courted her. I don’t care for the royal family, but I also have no sympathy for Meghan. Frankly, I think they all deserve each other.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I think they could have quietly left the family and lived out their life privately in CA without Oprah and Netflix. She is very pretty and has nice hair, but that is basically it. There's nothing special about them and now that they've aired their grievances they really should just disappear for a bit and focus on their charities.


While I agree with this, people and tabloids and news will continue to talk about them and find multitudes of reasons for outrage every. Single. Day. So it doesn’t really matter what they actually do, people will still have the perception that they’re everywhere constantly and that they’re in the public limelight.

You can’t win in their position.


You can if you just take the high road and stop talking ad nauseum about your in-laws.


They shouldn't have to take the high road. It's also not winning anything for them by doing so. So good for them for putting their side out there. I'd do the same.


Airing family laundry in public is interesting, in a voyeuristic way. But it's not the right thing to do.
Anonymous
You Meghan haters definitely do not belong on this thread but despite whatever might or might not be wrong with her there is clearly something wrong with you that you can't control your vitriol and anger on this topic.
Anonymous
Harry is a loser: he either needs his family of origin or his wife to have any relevance. Whether you like or not, Meghan at least has some ambition and energy. Harry is a one trick pony who’s been singing the same self-indulgent sad songs for most of his life.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Meghan is a well-educated woman who was in her mid 30s when she became involved with Harry. She also had a career in Hollywood. With access to the internet, tell all books, etc, this idea that she was an angelic, naive young woman is ridiculous. I’m sympathetic to Di precisely because she was 19, not well educated, and really not worldly when Charles courted her. I don’t care for the royal family, but I also have no sympathy for Meghan. Frankly, I think they all deserve each other.


This^ pretty much sums it up in a neutral manner. All of them are milking their royal genes & wedding rings and entertaining masses. As long as people are buying it, it'll remain up for sale. Not that different from Kardashians or other reality entertainers, just a fancier version.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Meghan is a well-educated woman who was in her mid 30s when she became involved with Harry. She also had a career in Hollywood. With access to the internet, tell all books, etc, this idea that she was an angelic, naive young woman is ridiculous. I’m sympathetic to Di precisely because she was 19, not well educated, and really not worldly when Charles courted her. I don’t care for the royal family, but I also have no sympathy for Meghan. Frankly, I think they all deserve each other.


This is a great point re the whole "Megan is the new Di" narrative, people ignore the fact that Meghan was middle aged when she married into the family whereas Di was 19.
Anonymous
I do believe the "bots" problem was intense. Look what happened to Amber Herd.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Meghan is a well-educated woman who was in her mid 30s when she became involved with Harry. She also had a career in Hollywood. With access to the internet, tell all books, etc, this idea that she was an angelic, naive young woman is ridiculous. I’m sympathetic to Di precisely because she was 19, not well educated, and really not worldly when Charles courted her. I don’t care for the royal family, but I also have no sympathy for Meghan. Frankly, I think they all deserve each other.


This is all true but I think W and C are making the best of it and just getting on doing what they need to do. So far neither has made much of a misstep which can't be said for any of the other current working royals or recently deceased except maybe Beatrice. All have had some sort of 'scandal.'
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:I do believe the "bots" problem was intense. Look what happened to Amber Herd.


Meghan has her own bots
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Meghan’s hair is beautiful. I think Kimberly Guilfoyle is trying and failing to achieve Meghan hair.


I thought the same thing! And I don't blame her, because so am I.


Does she chemically straighten it or blow it out?


Ok I have very similar hair (not quite as thick) and I’m thinking she does a blow out for the cameras and leaves it natural once in awhile. Actually today I have no plans and it’s not humid so I actually am accomplishing Meghan hair because no one will see it. I think keratin is ridiculously damaging in the long run and celebrities know this. The documentary showed her occasionally with the natural hair pulled back when she was not “made up.” I would pay real money for information about her products and routine. The question is how she dealt with the humidity in the UK.

LOTS of legit questions about her hair.
Forum Index » Entertainment and Pop Culture
Go to: