
He is only famous because he is connected to the royal family. Without that he is just a shmuck who would never ever be asked his opinion, or put in any position of power. He is biting the hand that feeds him. His kids will no longer be connected to the royal family. He’s taking away that option for them. Completely short sided. |
Wow, she takes up a lot of space in your head. How do you know she lies about everything? Did William tell you that first hand? Were you at the royal events? |
Not if that is what he wants. And it seems like he does. There are lots of "schmucks" who are nothing without family connections. So what? |
They shouldn't have to take the high road. It's also not winning anything for them by doing so. So good for them for putting their side out there. I'd do the same. |
They don't expect $100m from Netflix and put out silly pieces like this to earn it. That's what. |
Meghan is a well-educated woman who was in her mid 30s when she became involved with Harry. She also had a career in Hollywood. With access to the internet, tell all books, etc, this idea that she was an angelic, naive young woman is ridiculous. I’m sympathetic to Di precisely because she was 19, not well educated, and really not worldly when Charles courted her. I don’t care for the royal family, but I also have no sympathy for Meghan. Frankly, I think they all deserve each other. |
Airing family laundry in public is interesting, in a voyeuristic way. But it's not the right thing to do. |
You Meghan haters definitely do not belong on this thread but despite whatever might or might not be wrong with her there is clearly something wrong with you that you can't control your vitriol and anger on this topic. |
Harry is a loser: he either needs his family of origin or his wife to have any relevance. Whether you like or not, Meghan at least has some ambition and energy. Harry is a one trick pony who’s been singing the same self-indulgent sad songs for most of his life. |
This^ pretty much sums it up in a neutral manner. All of them are milking their royal genes & wedding rings and entertaining masses. As long as people are buying it, it'll remain up for sale. Not that different from Kardashians or other reality entertainers, just a fancier version. |
This is a great point re the whole "Megan is the new Di" narrative, people ignore the fact that Meghan was middle aged when she married into the family whereas Di was 19. |
I do believe the "bots" problem was intense. Look what happened to Amber Herd. |
This is all true but I think W and C are making the best of it and just getting on doing what they need to do. So far neither has made much of a misstep which can't be said for any of the other current working royals or recently deceased except maybe Beatrice. All have had some sort of 'scandal.' |
Meghan has her own bots |
Ok I have very similar hair (not quite as thick) and I’m thinking she does a blow out for the cameras and leaves it natural once in awhile. Actually today I have no plans and it’s not humid so I actually am accomplishing Meghan hair because no one will see it. I think keratin is ridiculously damaging in the long run and celebrities know this. The documentary showed her occasionally with the natural hair pulled back when she was not “made up.” I would pay real money for information about her products and routine. The question is how she dealt with the humidity in the UK. LOTS of legit questions about her hair. |