Thoughts on the “other woman”?

[Anonymous]

I don’t blame the other woman. She is irrelevant. Men or spouses aren’t property. They have a brain and their own free will. It is up to them alone (and with their spouse) to keep their marriage intact

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I noticed with the Adam Levine controversy that the super feminist take among younger millennials and Gen Z is to victimize the “other woman” and make the husband the sole perpetrator, including situations where the husband is famous and known to be married with kids. The husband IS most responsible for cheating on his wife, I agree with that. He’s the one who made promises he broke. But do women really not owe anything to other women anymore? It’s totally fine to be a side chick now , even when it’s publicly known that the wife has little kids at home?

I feel like I’m taking crazy pills watching all these young women fall all over themselves to defend that TikToker who had the affair with Adam Levine. I don’t care what lies he fed her, she knew he was married and she was an adult when their affair started. It’s interesting to me that it’s considered “unfeminist” to call her out for being a homewrecker or to tell her t9 shut her legs to married men. Why can’t two things be true at once? Adam Levine is a trash husband and I hope his wife leaves with half his fortune. But knowingly sleeping with married men is trash behavior too.

No, I did not sign up to be the enforcer of your marriage contract. Buy your husband a leash if you want to.

[Anonymous]

I don’t see her as a victim but I also don’t think it’s her fault he went and ruined his own marriage. Plenty of young, trying to be famous, LA Instagram girls would be flattered by a celebrity hitting on them. It’s entirely his fault for doing that.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I don’t blame the other woman. She is irrelevant. Men or spouses aren’t property. They have a brain and their own free will. It is up to them alone (and with their spouse) to keep their marriage intact

Exactly, and I wouldn’t want a husband who was trying and failing to sleep with other women, either. Sure, woman could reject him because he’s married but the fault lies with him for trying to sleep with them in the first place. That part would be the dealbreaker for me.

[Anonymous]

When I was OW, I didn't feel like I was harming the DW because I had no intention of breaking up her family. And when you think about it, I gotta give Sumner credit -- she could've dimed him out ages ago, but she didn't. She kept her mouth shut, she was discreet, no harm came to Behati. It wasn't until Sumner's friend tried to sell the story that Sumner herself came forward.

But honestly though, if Behati had an expectation of monogamy, she's a fool.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I don’t blame the other woman. She is irrelevant. Men or spouses aren’t property. They have a brain and their own free will. It is up to them alone (and with their spouse) to keep their marriage intact

Totally agree. And he's been very honest about bring a scumbag for decades. His wife knew that going in. Now he's just doing what he's going to do.

[Anonymous]

If people are so respectful of marriage vows, then why don't they mind their own business?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I don’t blame the other woman. She is irrelevant. Men or spouses aren’t property. They have a brain and their own free will. It is up to them alone (and with their spouse) to keep their marriage intact

You don’t have to blame her but what she did was wrong. Two different things.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:When I was OW, I didn't feel like I was harming the DW because I had no intention of breaking up her family. And when you think about it, I gotta give Sumner credit -- she could've dimed him out ages ago, but she didn't. She kept her mouth shut, she was discreet, no harm came to Behati. It wasn't until Sumner's friend tried to sell the story that Sumner herself came forward.

But honestly though, if Behati had an expectation of monogamy, she's a fool.

Well you were. In what f@cking world do you live in that you think f@cking another woman’s husband isn’t going to harm her…and ultimately her children when the affair us discovered.

You are a self-centered POS.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:When I was OW, I didn't feel like I was harming the DW because I had no intention of breaking up her family. And when you think about it, I gotta give Sumner credit -- she could've dimed him out ages ago, but she didn't. She kept her mouth shut, she was discreet, no harm came to Behati. It wasn't until Sumner's friend tried to sell the story that Sumner herself came forward.

But honestly though, if Behati had an expectation of monogamy, she's a fool.

Oh I wasn’t a bad person I was just f@cking her husband. No harm, no foul.

What a classy lady. I’m sure she loved to find out she was exposed to your whore germs.

Karma will come for you soon enough. You don’t do things that you know will hurt another person and get away with it in this universe.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:When I was OW, I didn't feel like I was harming the DW because I had no intention of breaking up her family. And when you think about it, I gotta give Sumner credit -- she could've dimed him out ages ago, but she didn't. She kept her mouth shut, she was discreet, no harm came to Behati. It wasn't until Sumner's friend tried to sell the story that Sumner herself came forward.

But honestly though, if Behati had an expectation of monogamy, she's a fool.

Yeah right. He never would have married you. It wasn’t even a consideration for him. Lol

[Anonymous]

Thoughts: poor character, dishonest, untrustworthy, zero empathy, classless, selfish, low self-esteem and can’t find a single man. Trash person that deserves all harm she invites in her life by doing this to another woman.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:When I was OW, I didn't feel like I was harming the DW because I had no intention of breaking up her family. And when you think about it, I gotta give Sumner credit -- she could've dimed him out ages ago, but she didn't. She kept her mouth shut, she was discreet, no harm came to Behati. It wasn't until Sumner's friend tried to sell the story that Sumner herself came forward.

But honestly though, if Behati had an expectation of monogamy, she's a fool.

Well you were. In what f@cking world do you live in that you think f@cking another woman’s husband isn’t going to harm her…and ultimately her children when the affair us discovered.

You are a self-centered POS.

That's the thing, it hasn't been discovered (and it's been over for a decade). And that's the viewpoint I was adding to this conversation. "Women looking out for other women" isn't a consideration if you don't intend to get caught, and most people don't. (Whether that's stupid isn't the issue.) Sumner actually kinda WAS looking out for Behati by keeping the affair quiet as opposed to publicly sabotaging their marriage.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:When I was OW, I didn't feel like I was harming the DW because I had no intention of breaking up her family. And when you think about it, I gotta give Sumner credit -- she could've dimed him out ages ago, but she didn't. She kept her mouth shut, she was discreet, no harm came to Behati. It wasn't until Sumner's friend tried to sell the story that Sumner herself came forward.

But honestly though, if Behati had an expectation of monogamy, she's a fool.

Yeah right. He never would have married you. It wasn’t even a consideration for him. Lol

Nor for me. We were both clear upfront that we weren't leaving our marriages.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:When I was OW, I didn't feel like I was harming the DW because I had no intention of breaking up her family. And when you think about it, I gotta give Sumner credit -- she could've dimed him out ages ago, but she didn't. She kept her mouth shut, she was discreet, no harm came to Behati. It wasn't until Sumner's friend tried to sell the story that Sumner herself came forward.

But honestly though, if Behati had an expectation of monogamy, she's a fool.

Well you were. In what f@cking world do you live in that you think f@cking another woman’s husband isn’t going to harm her…and ultimately her children when the affair us discovered.

You are a self-centered POS.

That's the thing, it hasn't been discovered (and it's been over for a decade). And that's the viewpoint I was adding to this conversation. "Women looking out for other women" isn't a consideration if you don't intend to get caught, and most people don't. (Whether that's stupid isn't the issue.) Sumner actually kinda WAS looking out for Behati by keeping the affair quiet as opposed to publicly sabotaging their marriage.

That is ridiculous. Nobody thinks they are going to get caught. The fact you would do that to someone else reflects on what an awful person you are.