The Laptop

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m sorry, why is this news? We knew at least some of the emails were real. Burisma was hacked. Confirming emails still doesn’t prove anything.

No. According to the DCUM "experts," none of this was true. Just Russian disinformation, donchaknow.

And, why is this news?

The emails contain information about Biden's son's foreign business activities. Questionable business activities that make many question if there is corruption here.
Business activities that Joe claims he knew nothing about, yet content on the email proves that statement false.
Around 50 "former intelligence officials" penned a letter saying it was Russian disinformation, a statement which they evidently pulled out of thin air.
Both Joe Biden and Psaki have repeated that lie.
Twitter and others suppressed this story.
These facts, among others, make this a story.

And, why now?
Because this piece came out in the NYT about the investigation:

This is literally nothing I didn’t know a year ago.

[Anonymous]

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m sorry, why is this news? We knew at least some of the emails were real. Burisma was hacked. Confirming emails still doesn’t prove anything.

No. According to the DCUM "experts," none of this was true. Just Russian disinformation, donchaknow.

And, why is this news?

The emails contain information about Biden's son's foreign business activities. Questionable business activities that make many question if there is corruption here.
Business activities that Joe claims he knew nothing about, yet content on the email proves that statement false.
Around 50 "former intelligence officials" penned a letter saying it was Russian disinformation, a statement which they evidently pulled out of thin air.
Both Joe Biden and Psaki have repeated that lie.
Twitter and others suppressed this story.
These facts, among others, make this a story.

And, why now?
Because this piece came out in the NYT about the investigation:

This is literally nothing I didn’t know a year ago.

Yes, but Ken Vogel thinks it’s his job to make a big fat hairy deal out of it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:On the one, we have the son of a president who is being investigated by the President's law enforcement officials.

On the other hand, we have presidential children using their position to fleece the American public of billions of dollars.

Hunter will get whatever he deserves.

How about the Trumps?

And, IMO, this is problematic.

Will the investigation be comprehensive? Will it be unbiased?
Will the investigation go in a different direction if the evidence shows it should?

I have my doubts.

If it had been the Trumps, the investigation would have been killed on January 21st. Facts matter. Biden's DOJ is, in fact, independent.

[Anonymous]

This story says the US Attorney has dug into every corner of this guy's life, trying as hard as he can to get him on something, and he's got nada. Strange that Trumpers think this is some kind of vindication.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:On the one, we have the son of a president who is being investigated by the President's law enforcement officials.

On the other hand, we have presidential children using their position to fleece the American public of billions of dollars.

Hunter will get whatever he deserves.

How about the Trumps?

And, IMO, this is problematic.

Will the investigation be comprehensive? Will it be unbiased?
Will the investigation go in a different direction if the evidence shows it should?

I have my doubts.

If it had been the Trumps, the investigation would have been killed on January 21st. Facts matter. Biden's DOJ is, in fact, independent.

This statement is laughable.
Especially after Trump was wrongly investigated for the majority of his presidency.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Really?

The same FBI that fabricated evidence to support FISA warrants to use to open the investigation of Trump?

I'm shocked! Shocked, I tell you!

Yes, you're shocking. The FBI didn't fabricate evidence...

Not sure what you call this....

Clinesmith pleaded guilty to a single false statement charge, admitting that he doctored an email that the FBI relied on as it sought court approval to eavesdrop on former Trump campaign aide Carter Page in 2017.

https://apnews.com/article/election-2020-b9b3c7ef398d00d5dfee9170d66cefec

[Anonymous]

Hun-tah. Hun-tah Biden.
Whatever happened to Hun-tah’s laptop?
Remember Hun-tah’s laptop?
He had a laptop. Where’s Hun-tah’s laptop?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:On the one, we have the son of a president who is being investigated by the President's law enforcement officials.

On the other hand, we have presidential children using their position to fleece the American public of billions of dollars.

Hunter will get whatever he deserves.

How about the Trumps?

And, IMO, this is problematic.

Will the investigation be comprehensive? Will it be unbiased?
Will the investigation go in a different direction if the evidence shows it should?

I have my doubts.

If it had been the Trumps, the investigation would have been killed on January 21st. Facts matter. Biden's DOJ is, in fact, independent.

This statement is laughable.
Especially after Trump was wrongly investigated for the majority of his presidency.

Wrongly? What was wrong about the Trump investigation?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:It's probably the same crap when Russians tried to hack the Macron campaign - the Russians mixed legitimate emails they pilfered from the campaign with totally fraudulent emails and then dumped them all over the internet and seeded them into the media.

It's pretty much impossible to tell what is real and fake on the laptop. That's how psy-op influence campaigns work - to get you to give up on distinguishing truth from fiction.

Mind blown.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Really?

The same FBI that fabricated evidence to support FISA warrants to use to open the investigation of Trump?

I'm shocked! Shocked, I tell you!

Yes, you're shocking. The FBI didn't fabricate evidence...

Not sure what you call this....

Clinesmith pleaded guilty to a single false statement charge, admitting that he doctored an email that the FBI relied on as it sought court approval to eavesdrop on former Trump campaign aide Carter Page in 2017.

https://apnews.com/article/election-2020-b9b3c7ef398d00d5dfee9170d66cefec

I call it quite the Overstatement.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:On the one, we have the son of a president who is being investigated by the President's law enforcement officials.

On the other hand, we have presidential children using their position to fleece the American public of billions of dollars.

Hunter will get whatever he deserves.

How about the Trumps?

And, IMO, this is problematic.

Will the investigation be comprehensive? Will it be unbiased?
Will the investigation go in a different direction if the evidence shows it should?

I have my doubts.

If it had been the Trumps, the investigation would have been killed on January 21st. Facts matter. Biden's DOJ is, in fact, independent.

This statement is laughable.
Especially after Trump was wrongly investigated for the majority of his presidency.

I’m suspecting they need a reason to get Joe out of office

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Really?

The same FBI that fabricated evidence to support FISA warrants to use to open the investigation of Trump?

I'm shocked! Shocked, I tell you!

Yes, you're shocking. The FBI didn't fabricate evidence...

Not sure what you call this....

Clinesmith pleaded guilty to a single false statement charge, admitting that he doctored an email that the FBI relied on as it sought court approval to eavesdrop on former Trump campaign aide Carter Page in 2017.

https://apnews.com/article/election-2020-b9b3c7ef398d00d5dfee9170d66cefec

What, WHAT. This NEVER happened (says every LWNJ out there)

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:On the one, we have the son of a president who is being investigated by the President's law enforcement officials.

On the other hand, we have presidential children using their position to fleece the American public of billions of dollars.

Hunter will get whatever he deserves.

How about the Trumps?

And, IMO, this is problematic.

Will the investigation be comprehensive? Will it be unbiased?
Will the investigation go in a different direction if the evidence shows it should?

I have my doubts.

If it had been the Trumps, the investigation would have been killed on January 21st. Facts matter. Biden's DOJ is, in fact, independent.

This statement is laughable.
Especially after Trump was wrongly investigated for the majority of his presidency.

Wrongly? What was wrong about the Trump investigation?

Oh, FFS. I am not going to revisit the whole Russian collusion delusion.

Suffice it to say Former Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein said that if he knew then what he knows now, he would not have signed his now-infamous application to continue surveillance on an ex-junior aide to Donald Trump. The FISA warrants were bogus.

The whole investigation was opened on a lie. A lie started by the Clinton campaign and the DNC.

What we have found is that the pee tape is fake and the laptop is real.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Really?

The same FBI that fabricated evidence to support FISA warrants to use to open the investigation of Trump?

I'm shocked! Shocked, I tell you!

Yes, you're shocking. The FBI didn't fabricate evidence...

Not sure what you call this....

Clinesmith pleaded guilty to a single false statement charge, admitting that he doctored an email that the FBI relied on as it sought court approval to eavesdrop on former Trump campaign aide Carter Page in 2017.

https://apnews.com/article/election-2020-b9b3c7ef398d00d5dfee9170d66cefec

I call it quite the Overstatement.

LOL. A DOJ lawyer pled guilty to doctoring evidence and you call it an "overstatement."
You're not partisan at all.