Meadows "Coup" PowerPoint

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I still can’t believe Dan freaking Quayle saved us

I can. I went to college in the Midwest and- though I hated it there- I would have placed my bets on Mike Pence to love his country, do the right thing and then walk off the stage just like a farmer tilling the back forty

What saved America was that NYC mob money man like Drump had no standing in the end to a midwestern boy

[Anonymous]

Remember when Chuck Grassley said he was going to be presiding over the Senate on 1/6?

Ya, he knew.

[Anonymous]

Why doesn’t Pence pull the Hero card here? I can’t stand the guy but he did do the right thing on Jan 6. Does Trump/Russia have something on him? I’m a Dem and actually am astonished that Pence manned up and saved our country on Jan. 6 along with the Capitol Police.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Why doesn’t Pence pull the Hero card here? I can’t stand the guy but he did do the right thing on Jan 6. Does Trump/Russia have something on him? I’m a Dem and actually am astonished that Pence manned up and saved our country on Jan. 6 along with the Capitol Police.

Because he fears for his life, and likely trump has something on him or his brother.

[Anonymous]

So how soon will we hear every single Congressional correspondent from NYT, WaPo, NBC, CBS, ABC, Fox, Politico, PunchBowl, Roll Call, and everywhere else asking Republicans whether they were in this meeting? Because I don’t want to hear anything else out of their seditious mouths except for an answer to that.

Or is everyone still just following Joe Manchin around?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:So how soon will we hear every single Congressional correspondent from NYT, WaPo, NBC, CBS, ABC, Fox, Politico, PunchBowl, Roll Call, and everywhere else asking Republicans whether they were in this meeting? Because I don’t want to hear anything else out of their seditious mouths except for an answer to that.

Or is everyone still just following Joe Manchin around?

They’re just going to follow Joe Manchin around, rewarding him for his stubbornness and for hastening the end of America.

Who GOP senators in what meeting? No one cares! CRT or caravans or something!! That’s more important! Biden won’t give us interviews!! Bad man! Bad party! GOP good, save America from extremism! <— is what “journalists” sound like these days.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Remember when Chuck Grassley said he was going to be presiding over the Senate on 1/6?

Ya, he knew.

Vaguely. Do you remember where you read it?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why doesn’t Pence pull the Hero card here? I can’t stand the guy but he did do the right thing on Jan 6. Does Trump/Russia have something on him? I’m a Dem and actually am astonished that Pence manned up and saved our country on Jan. 6 along with the Capitol Police.

Because he fears for his life, and likely trump has something on him or his brother.

+1 are you kidding? Trumpsters would send him death threats. Some of the 1/6 already wanted to "get to him". Plus, his political life as a R would be over. That's why he hasn't said much else about 1/6.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Remember when Chuck Grassley said he was going to be presiding over the Senate on 1/6?

Ya, he knew.

Vaguely. Do you remember where you read it?

Not PP but he said it and his office walked it back later.

[Anonymous]

He walked it back when he realized his octogenarian brain said the quiet part out loud.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Remember when Chuck Grassley said he was going to be presiding over the Senate on 1/6?

Ya, he knew.

Yeah, reading this in hindsight...

[Anonymous]

What's upsetting is that the presentation makes a lot of allegations without ever acknowledging that these issues had been reviewed by CISA and determined not to have influenced the outcome of the election.

I don't think it's bonkers to note that using foreign ballot counting software or hardware comes with risks that need to be weighed. But it is bonkers to move forward on overturning an election based on a theoretical risk after it had been reviewed and found to be a non-issue in this particular election.

Also, the PowerPoint presentation itself is crazy. The double exclamation points, the dramatic "the end" last slide. I was left kind of speechless.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Why doesn’t Pence pull the Hero card here? I can’t stand the guy but he did do the right thing on Jan 6. Does Trump/Russia have something on him? I’m a Dem and actually am astonished that Pence manned up and saved our country on Jan. 6 along with the Capitol Police.

You've answered your own question. Whose hero would he be? Democrats hate him regardless of his actions on that day.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:What's upsetting is that the presentation makes a lot of allegations without ever acknowledging that these issues had been reviewed by CISA and determined not to have influenced the outcome of the election.

I don't think it's bonkers to note that using foreign ballot counting software or hardware comes with risks that need to be weighed. But it is bonkers to move forward on overturning an election based on a theoretical risk after it had been reviewed and found to be a non-issue in this particular election.

Also, the PowerPoint presentation itself is crazy. The double exclamation points, the dramatic "the end" last slide. I was left kind of speechless.

The software reads dots on paper, or provides a paper receipt. There is no fraud available with the Dominion systems. ES&S is the system that has online servers that are totally hackable. Why hasn't the GOP wanted to look into those? You know, the ones used in Ohio, Kentucky, South Carolina, etc.?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:What's upsetting is that the presentation makes a lot of allegations without ever acknowledging that these issues had been reviewed by CISA and determined not to have influenced the outcome of the election.

I don't think it's bonkers to note that using foreign ballot counting software or hardware comes with risks that need to be weighed. But it is bonkers to move forward on overturning an election based on a theoretical risk after it had been reviewed and found to be a non-issue in this particular election.

Also, the PowerPoint presentation itself is crazy. The double exclamation points, the dramatic "the end" last slide. I was left kind of speechless.

Was any “foreign ballot counting software or hardware” actually used?