Meadows "Coup" PowerPoint

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:And amazingly, there are people in this forum who defend them and will continue to support them politically.


I struggle to understand this, but after watching Fox News or OAN for a few minutes on nights that we watch TV news, I can maybe sort of understand why. For example, last night while MSNBC was covering, news related to the Jan. 6 Commission, OAN was airing footage from Jan. 6 that was completely devoid of any of the violence that occurred that day--it literally was just shots of peaceful crowds walking to the Capitol and orderly lines of protesters walking through one of the large halls inside the Capitol. And the commentary accompanying that serene footage was about how Dems were making a big deal about a mostly peaceful protest that "got out of hand" for a few hours. I just don't see how a democracy is possible when its citizens live in two very different realities with two different sets of facts.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:And amazingly, there are people in this forum who defend them and will continue to support them politically.


I struggle to understand this, but after watching Fox News or OAN for a few minutes on nights that we watch TV news, I can maybe sort of understand why. For example, last night while MSNBC was covering, news related to the Jan. 6 Commission, OAN was airing footage from Jan. 6 that was completely devoid of any of the violence that occurred that day--it literally was just shots of peaceful crowds walking to the Capitol and orderly lines of protesters walking through one of the large halls inside the Capitol. And the commentary accompanying that serene footage was about how Dems were making a big deal about a mostly peaceful protest that "got out of hand" for a few hours. I just don't see how a democracy is possible when its citizens live in two very different realities with two different sets of facts.


I’ve been saying this for months.
The RWNJ networks have been exclusively airing the same 5-6 min loop of footage from Jan 6.
They don’t show any violence. Their audience is completely ignorant to what occurred.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:And amazingly, there are people in this forum who defend them and will continue to support them politically.


I struggle to understand this, but after watching Fox News or OAN for a few minutes on nights that we watch TV news, I can maybe sort of understand why. For example, last night while MSNBC was covering, news related to the Jan. 6 Commission, OAN was airing footage from Jan. 6 that was completely devoid of any of the violence that occurred that day--it literally was just shots of peaceful crowds walking to the Capitol and orderly lines of protesters walking through one of the large halls inside the Capitol. And the commentary accompanying that serene footage was about how Dems were making a big deal about a mostly peaceful protest that "got out of hand" for a few hours. I just don't see how a democracy is possible when its citizens live in two very different realities with two different sets of facts.


I’ve been saying this for months.
The RWNJ networks have been exclusively airing the same 5-6 min loop of footage from Jan 6.
They don’t show any violence. Their audience is completely ignorant to what occurred.


If I recall correctly, to deal with Holocaust-deniers in Germany, it took forcing people to watch footage or walk past the unearthed mass graves to convince them.

There is something about how the mind works. I'm sure it is self-protective. It's a good reason to avoid echo chambers for yourself -- you don't want to be like this. I listen to right-wing talk radio about 1/2 the time just to know what is going on, and because this effect (hard to challenge entrenched beliefs, often just doubling down) isn't specific to any particular belief. I think it's just the way the mind works.
Anonymous
jsteele wrote:Before former White House Chief Staff Mark Meadows stopped cooperating with the January 6 investigation committee he turned over several documents. One of them was a PowerPoint presentation detailing steps to prevent Joe Biden from being declared the winner. A few pages of the document have been publicized on social media and various news outlets, but I haven't seen a detailed description of just how bonkers the entire presentation really is. You can download the PowerPoint from here:

https://www.mediafire.com/file/g79xlbwbubqzm5b/Congressional_Election_Fraud_Briefing_4JAN2021_v20Diseminationpptx.pdf/file

Right off the bat, the document lists these taking points:

● The Chinese systematically gained control over our election system constituting a national security emergency
● The electronic voting machines were compromised and cannot be trusted to provide an accurate vote count
● To restore confidence the “failsafe” of counting the paper ballots must be used to determine who won the election for President, Senators, Congressional Representatives
● Hand counts reported by the media are not really hand counts and easily subverted

On Page 11 it has a crazy diagram outlining the alleged fraud that includes foreign actors injecting false data from a server in Frankfurt, Germany. This is full one QAnon-level stuff. Page 15 continues the QAnon type allegations with a timeline beginning with Hugo Chavez "creating" Smartmatic. It even manages to rope in Trump lackey Ric Grennell as part of the plot.

The document provides these recommendations:

● Brief Senators and Congressmen on foreign interference
● Declare National Security Emergency
● Foreign influence and control of electronic voting systems
● Declare electronic voting in all states invalid
● LEGAL & Genuine Paper ballot counts or Constitutional remedy delegated to Congress

The most concerning part of this is the point about declaring a national security emergency. It is amazing to see how high in the Trump administration this brain-rot and coup-plotting rose.


Does Smartmatic have servers in other countries?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
jsteele wrote:Before former White House Chief Staff Mark Meadows stopped cooperating with the January 6 investigation committee he turned over several documents. One of them was a PowerPoint presentation detailing steps to prevent Joe Biden from being declared the winner. A few pages of the document have been publicized on social media and various news outlets, but I haven't seen a detailed description of just how bonkers the entire presentation really is. You can download the PowerPoint from here:

https://www.mediafire.com/file/g79xlbwbubqzm5b/Congressional_Election_Fraud_Briefing_4JAN2021_v20Diseminationpptx.pdf/file

Right off the bat, the document lists these taking points:

● The Chinese systematically gained control over our election system constituting a national security emergency
● The electronic voting machines were compromised and cannot be trusted to provide an accurate vote count
● To restore confidence the “failsafe” of counting the paper ballots must be used to determine who won the election for President, Senators, Congressional Representatives
● Hand counts reported by the media are not really hand counts and easily subverted

On Page 11 it has a crazy diagram outlining the alleged fraud that includes foreign actors injecting false data from a server in Frankfurt, Germany. This is full one QAnon-level stuff. Page 15 continues the QAnon type allegations with a timeline beginning with Hugo Chavez "creating" Smartmatic. It even manages to rope in Trump lackey Ric Grennell as part of the plot.

The document provides these recommendations:

● Brief Senators and Congressmen on foreign interference
● Declare National Security Emergency
● Foreign influence and control of electronic voting systems
● Declare electronic voting in all states invalid
● LEGAL & Genuine Paper ballot counts or Constitutional remedy delegated to Congress

The most concerning part of this is the point about declaring a national security emergency. It is amazing to see how high in the Trump administration this brain-rot and coup-plotting rose.


Does Smartmatic have servers in other countries?

Which states did Smartmatic run elections for in 2020?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:And amazingly, there are people in this forum who defend them and will continue to support them politically.


I struggle to understand this, but after watching Fox News or OAN for a few minutes on nights that we watch TV news, I can maybe sort of understand why. For example, last night while MSNBC was covering, news related to the Jan. 6 Commission, OAN was airing footage from Jan. 6 that was completely devoid of any of the violence that occurred that day--it literally was just shots of peaceful crowds walking to the Capitol and orderly lines of protesters walking through one of the large halls inside the Capitol. And the commentary accompanying that serene footage was about how Dems were making a big deal about a mostly peaceful protest that "got out of hand" for a few hours. I just don't see how a democracy is possible when its citizens live in two very different realities with two different sets of facts.


I’ve been saying this for months.
The RWNJ networks have been exclusively airing the same 5-6 min loop of footage from Jan 6.
They don’t show any violence. Their audience is completely ignorant to what occurred.


If I recall correctly, to deal with Holocaust-deniers in Germany, it took forcing people to watch footage or walk past the unearthed mass graves to convince them.

There is something about how the mind works. I'm sure it is self-protective. It's a good reason to avoid echo chambers for yourself -- you don't want to be like this. I listen to right-wing talk radio about 1/2 the time just to know what is going on, and because this effect (hard to challenge entrenched beliefs, often just doubling down) isn't specific to any particular belief. I think it's just the way the mind works.


This makes sense, PP. There HAS to be some reason why millions of Americans voted for Trump twice and continue to believe the Big Lie. I can't bring myself to listen to RW radio, but I do watch RW TV regularly (a few minutes is all I can take) to keep up with their unique spin on the "news of the day." It provides really helpful insight.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:I guess the 1/6 Commission will need to hold prime time streamed/televised hearings to tell the story. No one is going to read the 10,000 word report with 100,000 sources and appendices.


I understand the Commission is doing a real, live investigation here, which they don't want to get distracted from by the media circus of televised hearings. I also think they using the secrecy of the investigation to their advantage to get people to come in and talk, for fear that they'll be the ones left holding the bag.

BUT it's time for some televised hearings, before the country gets distracted further.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I guess the 1/6 Commission will need to hold prime time streamed/televised hearings to tell the story. No one is going to read the 10,000 word report with 100,000 sources and appendices.


I understand the Commission is doing a real, live investigation here, which they don't want to get distracted from by the media circus of televised hearings. I also think they using the secrecy of the investigation to their advantage to get people to come in and talk, for fear that they'll be the ones left holding the bag.

BUT it's time for some televised hearings, before the country gets distracted further.


What's the use? Fox/OAN won't air the televised hearings or, if they do, they will do so with hugely negative commentary and spinning. And they will continue personal attacks on Schiff and other committee members as a distraction. So, per usual, half the country won't learn the facts related to that day.
Anonymous
Anonymous
I mean some of the news networks responsible for this impregnable right wing echo chamber could be criminally implicated here. But it’s a very tough line of attack to make and maintain credibility as arbiters of free press. So, I suppose the real press in this country, that isn’t compromised, needs to work harder to breakthrough your those captured audiences. I don’t know how.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:How is this just HAPPENING and we're all just like, well Republicans are prbly gonna win in 2022!


Also just imagine if Nixon were caught bugging the Watergate today. People would be like, shrug.


Fox News would be running stories alternately claiming it didn’t happen, it was a false flag operation, and Nixon was totally justified in doing it. The mainstream media would publish stories about how Democrats also sometimes record conversations.


And Trump would call the Democrats stupid for not having an unpickable lock on their doors.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:If I recall correctly, to deal with Holocaust-deniers in Germany, it took forcing people to watch footage or walk past the unearthed mass graves to convince them.

There is something about how the mind works. I'm sure it is self-protective. It's a good reason to avoid echo chambers for yourself -- you don't want to be like this. I listen to right-wing talk radio about 1/2 the time just to know what is going on, and because this effect (hard to challenge entrenched beliefs, often just doubling down) isn't specific to any particular belief. I think it's just the way the mind works.

You keep doing that. Some of us have plenty of maga friends and family and don’t need any more exposure to right wing stuff.

I’ve been saying since the early Trump years that these people would need to be walked past the semi-metaphorical bodies they’ve helped kill, but you’re right that their news silo has so far prevented them from seeing anything.
Anonymous
Great thread by Bob Costa synthesizing all the reporting and providing a timeline.

Anonymous
I still can’t believe Dan freaking Quayle saved us
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:They're not "insane." They're evil.


Just corrupt, power hungry and immoral- like MOST regimes in Human history

Our Constitution was written by people who grew up under dictators and had just fought to free themselves.

The sad truth is that in a LOT of countries might rules and corruption is deeply systemic- just look at Central & South America

THAT is where Trump leads.

Meadows should be charged with Treason and spreading 2020 election falsehoods should be a felony just like in Germany its a felony to publicly state that the Holocaust didn't happen
post reply Forum Index » Political Discussion
Message Quick Reply
Go to: