Meghan and Prince Harry are moving to the U.S./Canada - OFFICIAL

[Anonymous]

^^royal not total

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I think was a good outcome for the Queen in this horrible situation. . She was smart to let them keep HRH but not use it because that way when they divorce (and they will) you can bring Harry back in. Smart to also make sure he always has a U.K. home and I predict Megan goes there zero. Also if they do something wacky everyone will know they are not representing England. Also like that they have to pay back the money spent in Frogmore. Will see what the future holds and hopefully they make it but it will be hard. He is essentially no longer royal and will have to find something to do. She will be fine and back to making bad tv

Harry was born a prince. He will always be royal.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think was a good outcome for the Queen in this horrible situation. . She was smart to let them keep HRH but not use it because that way when they divorce (and they will) you can bring Harry back in. Smart to also make sure he always has a U.K. home and I predict Megan goes there zero. Also if they do something wacky everyone will know they are not representing England. Also like that they have to pay back the money spent in Frogmore. Will see what the future holds and hopefully they make it but it will be hard. He is essentially no longer royal and will have to find something to do. She will be fine and back to making bad tv

Harry was born a prince. He will always be royal.

Essentially not.

[Anonymous]

If they are not on the balcony for various high profile events and walking to church together on holidays their cache diminishes. It will now be on Harry to make a relationship and not the other way around. Power balance got skewed with their demands. The Queen is like a boss!!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:My take on all of this is that the truth about Andrew must be much, much worse than is public yet.

I don’t think this is about Andrew, or solely about him anyways. The Queen is a savvy crisis manager, the more she acts as a loving, caring, understanding and generous grandmother, the more she invalidates their claims. I am not saying her sentiments are not genuine, they could very well be, only that her approach here benefits her image and that of the RF.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think was a good outcome for the Queen in this horrible situation. . She was smart to let them keep HRH but not use it because that way when they divorce (and they will) you can bring Harry back in. Smart to also make sure he always has a U.K. home and I predict Megan goes there zero. Also if they do something wacky everyone will know they are not representing England. Also like that they have to pay back the money spent in Frogmore. Will see what the future holds and hopefully they make it but it will be hard. He is essentially no longer royal and will have to find something to do. She will be fine and back to making bad tv

Harry was born a prince. He will always be royal.

Not in title

[Anonymous]

The really put themselves at a diss advantage (lol) when they put in their website how things were going to be in the future. It was rude and a total reach. They got bad advice. You don’t tell the queen you are going to be a part time royal

[Anonymous]

Almost 300 pages. It's like counting down to New Year's Eve.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:My take on all of this is that the truth about Andrew must be much, much worse than is public yet.

I don’t think this is about Andrew, or solely about him anyways. The Queen is a savvy crisis manager, the more she acts as a loving, caring, understanding and generous grandmother, the more she invalidates their claims. I am not saying her sentiments are not genuine, they could very well be, only that her approach here benefits her image and that of the RF.

I never thought the Queen was the issue. It’s the press. She should have done more to restrain them though.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:My take on all of this is that the truth about Andrew must be much, much worse than is public yet.

I don’t think this is about Andrew, or solely about him anyways. The Queen is a savvy crisis manager, the more she acts as a loving, caring, understanding and generous grandmother, the more she invalidates their claims. I am not saying her sentiments are not genuine, they could very well be, only that her approach here benefits her image and that of the RF.

I never thought the Queen was the issue. It’s the press. She should have done more to restrain them though.

"Never complain, never explain." It works, but not instantaneously.

Meghan was too impatient.

[Anonymous]

I had it on good authority that if they relinquished their titles all the MM haters would chill. That’s what happened right??

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I had it on good authority that if they relinquished their titles all the MM haters would chill. That’s what happened right??

Exactly.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Maybe Meghan can add an asterisk: the commoner formerly known as royal

So instead of "Sussesroyal" will it be "SussexCommon"? Sounds like an apartment complex.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I had it on good authority that if they relinquished their titles all the MM haters would chill. That’s what happened right??

Who is this “good authority”?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I had it on good authority that if they relinquished their titles all the MM haters would chill. That’s what happened right??

Exactly.

They won’t settle for anything less than divorce.

The possibility that she might be happy deeply triggers them.