How is the Supreme Court confirmation going to go?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Senator Boof didn't ask one question, rather lectured about dark money on the right. He ignored all the Soros money on the left.

Whitehouse? I thought he did a great job. What's the point of questions? Again, Lindsey made very clear how the GOP will vote. They said they'd vote yes before POTUS gave a nominee!!!

Please cite 'all the Soros money'.

For those who want to see Whitehouse's presentation, the whole thing is on Aaron Rupar's twitter feed.

A quick search Google search of "Soros backing Attorney General races" brought up at least 6 different races since 2016.

Attorneys General run for elected office. Judges don’t, or at least they’re not supposed to.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:
What a giant waste of time this is.

+1

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
What a giant waste of time this is.

+1

Why is a hearing for one of 9 Justices on our highest court a waste of time?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Senator Boof didn't ask one question, rather lectured about dark money on the right. He ignored all the Soros money on the left.

Whitehouse? I thought he did a great job. What's the point of questions? Again, Lindsey made very clear how the GOP will vote. They said they'd vote yes before POTUS gave a nominee!!!

Please cite 'all the Soros money'.

For those who want to see Whitehouse's presentation, the whole thing is on Aaron Rupar's twitter feed.

Or, refer to this.......

What is more telling is everyone reading these DCUM posts look at the time stamp of both the Fox headline and the mocking “ conspiracy drawing :
These posts were made - including the Fox push back- while Senator Whitehouse was still speaking
While he was speaking - Fox News is trying to undermine him

Wow ! He must really be threatening to someone ....AND how revealing is it that seems Fox responds to push back without any editor at Fox even deliberating ? It’s pretty damning evidence that Fox is not a news organization, but a propaganda arm of Citizens United corporate dark money

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
What a giant waste of time this is.

+1

Why is a hearing for one of 9 Justices on our highest court a waste of time?

She’s unqualified, she’s lying - and unless Graham or Lee ends up in the hospital and can’t vote, she’s getting confirmed. The GOP is anti democracy.

[Anonymous]

Why does Klobuchar always sound like she’s on the verge of tears?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:^^ It doesn't exist. But we do know Obama care is front and center, since that is the way these hearing should be conducted of course.

It does exist! She rolled her eyes yesterday at Roe v Wade.

Saw it live with my own damn eyes.

Link to this or shut up. She did not roll her eyes at anyone. Mazie Hirono, however, did indeed roll her eyes - at Barrett. Start around 11:07 and zoom in for a clear shot of Hirono sighing heavily and rolling her eyes in an incredibly rude way when ACB speaks of her gratitude to RBG.

Her remarks were thoroughly banal and worthy of eye-rolling.

Oh, please. If a Republican senator had done that to a Democratic nominee, your head would be exploding.

[Anonymous]

Has anyone questioned her about the specifics of her academic publications and rulings?

[Anonymous]

[Anonymous]

Is she getting pissed now..lol

[Anonymous]

According to the Economist, she is least popular SC nominee in recent history:

https://www.economist.com/graphic-detail/2020/10/12/amy-coney-barrett-is-the-least-popular-supreme-court-nominee-in-recent-history

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:According to the Economist, she is least popular SC nominee in recent history:

https://www.economist.com/graphic-detail/2020/10/12/amy-coney-barrett-is-the-least-popular-supreme-court-nominee-in-recent-history

Well, she did say that it's ok to use the n-word at work...

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:^^ It doesn't exist. But we do know Obama care is front and center, since that is the way these hearing should be conducted of course.

It does exist! She rolled her eyes yesterday at Roe v Wade.

Saw it live with my own damn eyes.

Link to this or shut up. She did not roll her eyes at anyone. Mazie Hirono, however, did indeed roll her eyes - at Barrett. Start around 11:07 and zoom in for a clear shot of Hirono sighing heavily and rolling her eyes in an incredibly rude way when ACB speaks of her gratitude to RBG.

She did yesterday. It was when Booker was talking.

Enjoy being enslaved by ACB!!!!!

Link to it. I made a claim and backed it up with a link. If you can’t manage that, it’s clear you’re lying.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:According to the Economist, she is least popular SC nominee in recent history:

https://www.economist.com/graphic-detail/2020/10/12/amy-coney-barrett-is-the-least-popular-supreme-court-nominee-in-recent-history

Well, she did say that it's ok to use the n-word at work...

What??? Cite on that?

[Anonymous]

Bam. ACB nailed Klobuchar with RBG’s own words. Nicely done.