+1 to your questions. Also, is this the same daughter and SIL who allegedly took her to dinner the night (?) before she went missing? They picked her up or did they meet her at a restaurant and she drove? |
Your family member sounds really professional. |
They literally just released a statement saying they believe she has very much alive. |
In your family member's opinion. Until we know, we don't know. |
|
Any time anyone refers to "third world countries" in the context of poor or developing countries, it's like one is actually bragging about being incredibly dumb and uneducated.
Congrats, much stupid very dim Finland and Sweden are "third world countries" by the original, correct definition of the term. Also, whoever has the family member "working the case" ... they actually suck at their job and you are even worse for running to the internet with whatever information they feed your slack-jawed maw that you can't keep shut |
| I thought they said without her medicine she would not survive after 2 days. |
It’s heart medication. That’s an estimate. You can very much live longer than that, but your well-being would be very impacted. Other organs will start to be impacted. |
|
https://x.com/pimasheriff/status/2019065207457489020?s=46&t=R3AX3c486LFdeZpFtkN_eA
The sheriffs office put an official statement out that there is no person of interest identified. I’m not sure if this is a smoke screen or real. |
The Cleveland police said the same thing about the dentist case even while they were already focused on the ex-husband. |
They’ve obviously cleared the sister and boyfriend. Between their cell phones location, security camera of them coming home and not leaving, data from their vehicles, etc. Shame on people who are dragging him because of how he “looks weird “or “looks creepy” or“is he foreign?”. People need to check their unconscious bias. |
| It is 100% a smokescreen |
I’m pretty sure the idea is that the brother in law is behind the kidnapping, not that he necessarily did the kidnapping himself. And you have zero basis to say they have been cleared because no information has been put out about their cell phone locations, security cameras, etc. |
Where does it say they were cleared? Violent crime is statistically more likely to be committed by someone known to the victim (about 60–75% of cases) rather than a stranger, it has nothing to do with with his race or looks. |
| I feel like now that information about the brother in law’s possible involvement is out there, if they really have something on him it is only a matter of time before they arrest him. They can just keep him under surveillance if it’s not known he’s a suspect and see if they learn something useful, but now that it’s out there is little value in that. |
Not the owner. |