Trump and Hegseth’s war crimes trials are going to be EPIC. |
| Targeting civilians is a war crime. |
💯 agree with you. Cold blooded murder and he doesn’t care. |
Have you seen the videos? What kind of fish do you catch going 70 mph? |
So you murder people going 70 mph? They were trying to get away from the US military. What about killing US citizens crossing the border? Why can’t they be killed by Trump? I guess you would be okay killing a civilian driving 70 on the beltway, criticizing Trump or Israel? Just kill anyone you want to. |
Or what kind of fishing are you doing in a submarine? |
Oh. It is now? Nobody but Rand Paul cared back in March 2013. But ok. Sure. Now we care. Both the Democrats the Republicans considered him unhinged and no one was willing to say that yeah, maybe we should not do this - for thirteen hours. And his issue was even clearer cut - U.S. Citizens, on American soil. It took THIRTEEN HOURS for people to get their heads out of their asses and agree that maybe that wasn't an insane ask. Anyone acting like this stuff is new, or out of left field? Wake up. |
Just make more stuff up. 56 people murdered because they were fishing try to feed their family or refugees fleeing to a better life. Killing civilians is a war crime. Doing it with no war is just murder. |
Actual, serious question for you, that I would really, really appreciate your making a serious answer: If these are simple fishermen “just trying to feed their families” , as you insist, how did these “simple fishermen” who are just trying to feed their families afford a 40-something foot speedboat with 2 or 4 outboard motors, costing around half a million dollars? Because boats are expensive. I know - I’ve owned them most of my life. And the ones I’ve seen getting blown up cost more than the average American home. How are these humble fishermen just trying to feed their families able to afford boats like this? I have no trouble feeding my family at all, and I can’t afford a $500,000 boat. Can you please explain this? |
I can’t, and they probably were drug boats, but that honestly doesn’t matter. You are completely missing and/or ignoring the point. The problem is that there was NO evidence presented, NO evidence of crime committed in the US, and NO trial or due process. The US is repeatedly going into International waters to blow up boats with only the assumption that they are coming to the US with drugs. If there is so much evidence to support it and proof that these boats were trafficking drugs and truly headed to the US, then why for god’s sake would they not just present it? Alternatively, wait for them to arrive and arrest them or execute them AFTER they enter the states with drugs. At least then, they would have evidence. It’s pure idiocy! |