Tysons Corner Casino -- Foregone Conclusion Now?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Spanberger needs to veto this quickly before it hijacks the redistricting effort. The longer the casino is out there the more it hurts her bigger efforts.

Prediction: Spanberger will not veto or sign the legislation.

If she doesn’t veto it by April 13, then the legislation passes even without her signature. If she does nothing, she is a bigger coward than I thought.

Tick tock, Spanberger.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Spanberger needs to veto this quickly before it hijacks the redistricting effort. The longer the casino is out there the more it hurts her bigger efforts.

Prediction: Spanberger will not veto or sign the legislation.

If she doesn’t veto it by April 13, then the legislation passes even without her signature. If she does nothing, she is a bigger coward than I thought.

Tick tock, Spanberger.

She supported it. She will let it pass even if she doesn’t sign it. Why can’t people comprehend that?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Spanberger needs to veto this quickly before it hijacks the redistricting effort. The longer the casino is out there the more it hurts her bigger efforts.

Prediction: Spanberger will not veto or sign the legislation.

If she doesn’t veto it by April 13, then the legislation passes even without her signature. If she does nothing, she is a bigger coward than I thought.

Tick tock, Spanberger.

She supported it. She will let it pass even if she doesn’t sign it. Why can’t people comprehend that?

Point out one instance where she has explicitly said she supports the casino? I don’t necessary thing you are wrong that she won’t veto the bill, but I cannot think of any example where she commented on it.

[Anonymous]

She will sign only bills that are in her best interest from a political standpoint. All others she will let pass without signature saying it is the will of the good people of Virginia.

No spine just goes with the flow.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Go live by a casino and tell me crime doesn’t go up. As someone who used to work with studies and data, they can all be cherry picked to the narrative you want. In reality, casinos have a lot of problems and were designed to lift up depressed areas, the trade off was crime and increased costs for that area. That may have been a good trade off if they area wasn’t doing well, but Tysons? You can show me any study you want, in 5-10 years this casino will be very problematic for not only Tysons but NoVa. But then the developers and unions are happy because they got their money. Now NoVa will be stuck with the problem. For anyone dependent on the financial spoils that the casino will bring in, you are wrong. Just watch and see how Richmond will give nova less money out of the total pot and we will have higher expenses to support this casino for the benefit of said Marylanders. For anyone supporting this bill they either need to take their blinders off or ask comstock to up their money to buy you off. It’s going to ruin a lot of people who support it.

It’s going to tank the political careers of local Democrats who claim to oppose the casino if Spanberger doesn’t veto the bill. It will also reduce the willingness of people to vote in favor of the redistricting amendment. It’s stunning that the Democrats do not realize the wound they are inflicting on themselves right now.

led by Democrat Scott Surovell

a SLIMY divorce lawyer working for his daddy's law firm.

https://virginiamercury.com/2026/03/04/virginia-legislator-pushes-casino-proposal-that-many-in-his-wealthy-county-detest/

that is what Democrats have become.

and they still dont understand why workers have migrated to republicans

Surovell has found a way for Fairfax County to find its schools. He has your best interests at heart. Once we have a casino, the state legislature can cut off all school funding.

hold on there

a divorce lawyer working for his daddy's firm is worried about fairfax counties families????

that is rich

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Spanberger needs to veto this quickly before it hijacks the redistricting effort. The longer the casino is out there the more it hurts her bigger efforts.

Prediction: Spanberger will not veto or sign the legislation.

If she doesn’t veto it by April 13, then the legislation passes even without her signature. If she does nothing, she is a bigger coward than I thought.

Tick tock, Spanberger.

She supported it. She will let it pass even if she doesn’t sign it. Why can’t people comprehend that?

Point out one instance where she has explicitly said she supports the casino? I don’t necessary thing you are wrong that she won’t veto the bill, but I cannot think of any example where she commented on it.

Spanberger accepted $100,000 from Christopher Clemente, the CEO of Comstock Holding Companies, the developer pushing for the Tysons project. Winsome Earle-Sears, ac words $105,000 from a PAC funded by the same developer. By accepting the money from Clemente, Spanberger signaled her support for the casino though she said she wants to see a gambling commission to go with it. It is all political jockeying and making room for plausible deniability in any event. Having someone from your own party pushing for this casino makes it more likely she will let it pass without signing the bill.

[Anonymous]

Governor Spanberger vetoed the casino bill!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Governor Spanberger vetoed the casino bill!

She must be more worried about that approval rating than I thought.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Governor Spanberger vetoed the casino bill!

So many extremey confident posters proven wrong! Love our new Governor!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Governor Spanberger vetoed the casino bill!

She must be more worried about that approval rating than I thought.

It’s hysterical how all you dipshits need to now create some new narrative for her actions.

Maybe she was following DCUM and you convinced her.

[Anonymous]

Fabulous news!

[Anonymous]

Yayy she vetoed it. I’m am so happy about this. She at least has some integrity and respect for what voters want.

[Anonymous]

“I have worked on this legislation for four years. I will not stop. Northern Virginia workers and families deserve the economic opportunity that every other region of this Commonwealth already has access to. We will be back."

- Scott Surovell

[Anonymous]

Hopefully she will also veto the unconstitutional assault weapons ban and save VA money by fighting a losing SC battle.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:“I have worked on this legislation for four years. I will not stop. Northern Virginia workers and families deserve the economic opportunity that every other region of this Commonwealth already has access to. We will be back."

- Scott Surovell

He is such a turd. Glad to see him flushed down the toilet for a while. Someone needs to primary him.