
Ultimately this is what we’ll be doing. I can’t wait to hear everyone scream about how we’re sending the wrong message to our kids about what a priority school is though. |
This is so let them eat cake. So you'll travel for those 7 day "long weekends" even though your kid is technically supposed to be present in the morning? And travel all of the 13 existing long weekends that have been put in place for holidays and teacher workday? that's a lot of travel. Unfortunately, both spouse and I are employed so we cannot take off that much. It must be nice to be unemployed. |
I’m not who you’re quoting, and I am employed, but what’s the alternative here? Do the morning rush and drop off just to turn around and get the kids again, but take time off work anyway? I can’t see why I have to do that to myself or my kids for a stupid choice made by FCPS without input from parents. I’m going to have to take the time off anyway, I may as well be doing something enriching and enjoyable with my kids. But, again, I had better not hear a single word about how parents and teachers are a partnership or how we need to support our schools. |
Or maybe Loudoun will learn to make the announcement over the summertime instead of the school year. |
YOU are making the decision to pull/keep your child out. YOU. There may very well be an option for you to keep your kids at school on Mondays. Teachers don’t really care whether or not you support them. It’s the preference that you do, but we won’t lose sleep over, if it if you don’t. |
FCPS only has itself to blame. All the random holidays and work days send the message. My kid is in a lower performing middle school. After the SOLs, the school changes the schedule to build in extra time to work with the majority who failed. Those who passed are supposed to spend those weeks doing self directed learning. My kid and most of their friends got the message loud and clear. They had almost daily doctors appointments or illnesses because reading at home is preferable to Lexia or just staring into space for those finished with Lexia |
And there may very well not. If there was a great plan with lots of qualified supervision and genuine enrichment I bet we would have heard all about it by now, don’t you? I don’t think teachers need to lose sleep. I think they need to realize how hollow calls for their “support” sound when yet another misogynistic policy comes down from FCPS. |
Their entire school board was voted out. I think they’ve learned not to alienate the parents. |
Mandated by who? If it's FCPS drop that shiz |
I’ve thought this too. I don’t expect FCPS to survey us about things like the school calendar. I think about the times they have and they get so many differing opinions it’s like having too many cooks in the kitchen. Where we’ve lived before, the districts just put out the calendar for the following school year. They make changes and nobody says “boo” about it. It is what it is. |
Once again: teachers don’t make these policies. Let me write it again because we know repetition helps concepts stick: teachers don’t make these policies. So why are you attacking teachers? Guess what? They don’t make these policies. And teachers are parents, too. These schedules impact them as parents, as well. |
Do people not understand that when workers are remote, they are still....wait for it....working? When I telework, I can't leave my house to go get my kid and then care for them all afternoon. Maybe you have a six year old who can entertain themselves for three hours, and a boss who doesn't care if you're actually working, but I have neither. |
And neither do the teachers who have to stay for training. Somehow they still need to get their kids home, etc. Your problem isn’t unique. |
I'm not pretending it is....? Multiple people can be disrupted by this for different reasons. |
I can repeat concepts as well: teachers receive priority placement in SACC. This does not impact them equally to other parents. I’m not attacking anyone. I’m saying don’t ask for “support” when demanding more from parents who don’t get special status and whose views aren’t being considered. It’s a bad look. |