Forum Index
»
Entertainment and Pop Culture
Whoa. Do tell. |
+1 oh yeah. For sure. But I guess she was willing to overlook that for $$$$ |
Not sure what became of it but it was in the news: https://www.usatoday.com/story/life/people/2018/03/30/pippa-middletons-father-law-david-matthews-arrested-charge-raping-minor-1990-s/474647002 |
Definitely. It’s the perfect place for someone with no real skills or intellect. She sure is pretty, though. |
| If we could harness the schadenfreude Meghan’s mediocrity is generating, our energy problems would be over. |
Who wouldn’t. When they were playing tennis, they both looked like they wanted a post court set of steamy sex. |
So is Kate’s though. Pippa’s husband is kind of a butter face. |
The pedo FIL is supposedly the reason that Kate and Piipa aren’t photographed together in public these days. |
She seems to have good social skills, needed for PR and non-profit work. |
To be fair, so does Meghan Markle, only she complains and diverts focus to self more than a person in such roles should. |
| Has a faithful and loyal husband. |
Yes but then would you count Meghan and her mom as social climbers as well? |
DP, but i would. I don’t see any problem with what Kate and Meghan did. |
So then you mean she doesn't have good social skills |
DP and I do think Meghan and her mom are strivers but I don't think Meghan is in the same category as Diana and Kate, both of whom I think married with the specific intent to marry into the royal family and become royals. Whereas I think Meghan is an opportunist who has always looked for ways to earn more money or gain more social status, whether through her acting career, her influencer website, or social media. I think Meghan genuinely fell for Harry and then looked for ways to make that work "synergistically" for her because that's how her brain works -- how does this play into my brand? how do I pivot my career to work with the BRF and this relationship? I don't think becoming a Princess was her ultimate goal, but she did seek to exploit it (and still does) to her benefit because I think she's always looking for more financial security and social leverage. Whereas for Kate/Diana, the marriage and becoming Princess was the thing. In both cases because their families wanted/needed them to, but Kate was obviously much better prepared for the role and I think ultimately wanted the public-facing and responsibility side of it, whereas I think Diana just wanted the clothes and the parties, at least at first (eventually I do think she appreciated the way her position allowed her to help people she cared about, and overlooking her work with AIDS patients or land mine survivors shortchanges her, even if it's okay to acknowledge she was pretty shallow and not terribly intellectual most of her life). |