Meghan and Prince Harry are moving to the U.S./Canada - OFFICIAL

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She's back to looking like the woman Harry fell in love with. I'm happy for her.

Can't wait til she walks the red carpet in the latest fashions too.

Are these recent? Is her mom visiting in Canada?

Her mom visited over Christmas. Unclear if she’s there now, but it’s satisfying to see refute all those posters who claim Meghan and Doria have a rift and Doria was shut out of Archie’s first Christmas.

These are from 2017. Her mom did not visit over Christmas. They saw her at Thanksgiving, but oddly she flew in her Pilates instructor instead of mom for emotional support.

So with her dramatic escape from England and her son’s first Christmas, her mother wasn’t even there with them in Canada. Effectively MM has zero relationship with ANYONE from her family. All of her friends are new celebrity friends formed after her association with Harry. Pretty much tells you all you need to know about her.

Thank God she doesn't have anything to do with that mentally ill group of people called her "family." Except for her mother, to a noe they are the kind of people anyone rational would be urging her to become estranged from, for her own good and for the good of her new baby. Do you have no sense whatsoever PP? Or do you always encourage people to stay in close relationships with abusers?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The product placement has begun

https://people.com/royals/meghan-markles-whale-tail-necklace-from-her-first-charity-visit-in-canada-has-symbolic-meaning/amp/?xid=amprecirc1

Same deal as she had with Jennifer Meyer but does not have to do it under the table anymore.

I’m so glad you brought this up. In the group picture (posted up thread) is is wearing a gold necklace with a round pendant. In lipids from the same event and released the next day she the whale on. What’s the deal?

She was wearing the round pendant and then swapped for this. Probably paid for placing both.

Yes, she's desperate for money. Oh, no, I'm sorry she's a gold digger.

Those pictures were NOT from the time the story describes. Morons.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The product placement has begun

https://people.com/royals/meghan-markles-whale-tail-necklace-from-her-first-charity-visit-in-canada-has-symbolic-meaning/amp/?xid=amprecirc1

Same deal as she had with Jennifer Meyer but does not have to do it under the table anymore.

I’m so glad you brought this up. In the group picture (posted up thread) is is wearing a gold necklace with a round pendant. In lipids from the same event and released the next day she the whale on. What’s the deal?

She was wearing the round pendant and then swapped for this. Probably paid for placing both.

Ha ha! What a scam artist! In the end, she and Trump are two peas in a pod!

You and Trump, more like it, since you're both too stupid to read. The pics posted were not taken at the time of the story posted. D'oh.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The product placement has begun

https://people.com/royals/meghan-markles-whale-tail-necklace-from-her-first-charity-visit-in-canada-has-symbolic-meaning/amp/?xid=amprecirc1

Same deal as she had with Jennifer Meyer but does not have to do it under the table anymore.

I’m so glad you brought this up. In the group picture (posted up thread) is is wearing a gold necklace with a round pendant. In lipids from the same event and released the next day she the whale on. What’s the deal?

She was wearing the round pendant and then swapped for this. Probably paid for placing both.

Ha ha! What a scam artist! In the end, she and Trump are two peas in a pod!

You and Trump, more like it, since you're both too stupid to read. The pics posted were not taken at the time of the story posted. D'oh.

From the article: Earlier in the day (and wearing a different necklace, indicating the whale pendant was gifted at the later Justice for Girls visit), Meghan visited Downtown Eastside Women’s Centre, where she discussed “issues affecting women in the community.”

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The product placement has begun

https://people.com/royals/meghan-markles-whale-tail-necklace-from-her-first-charity-visit-in-canada-has-symbolic-meaning/amp/?xid=amprecirc1

Same deal as she had with Jennifer Meyer but does not have to do it under the table anymore.

I’m so glad you brought this up. In the group picture (posted up thread) is is wearing a gold necklace with a round pendant. In lipids from the same event and released the next day she the whale on. What’s the deal?

Did you read the article? It’s written right in the article the difference. When she wore the round necklace it was in the morning. When she arrived at the second meeting, the artist gifted Meghan the necklace and thanked her for bringing awareness to the indigenous tribe. BTW, the article also states that at both events, it was the staff who took those pictures and twitted the visit out. No paparazzi to be found for all the fonts claiming Meghan called the paparazzi to follow her around.

The evil step sisters do not care about the facts. They only want proof that the prince made the wrong choice when he didn't marry them instead of MM. Sad, wrung-out bitches.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The product placement has begun

https://people.com/royals/meghan-markles-whale-tail-necklace-from-her-first-charity-visit-in-canada-has-symbolic-meaning/amp/?xid=amprecirc1

Same deal as she had with Jennifer Meyer but does not have to do it under the table anymore.

I’m so glad you brought this up. In the group picture (posted up thread) is is wearing a gold necklace with a round pendant. In lipids from the same event and released the next day she the whale on. What’s the deal?

Did you read the article? It’s written right in the article the difference. When she wore the round necklace it was in the morning. When she arrived at the second meeting, the artist gifted Meghan the necklace and thanked her for bringing awareness to the indigenous tribe. BTW, the article also states that at both events, it was the staff who took those pictures and twitted the visit out. No paparazzi to be found for all the fonts claiming Meghan called the paparazzi to follow her around.

I can’t believe she’s being demonized for supporting indigenous artists while doing classic royal “work” on environmental issues. Seriously I feel like I’m in the twilight zone.

I seriously wonder if Samantha Markle is here. I'm sure she scours the internet for threads about her sister and posts on them. Why wouldn't a crazy like that do so?


Crazy MM haters see what they want to see. The live in the Twilight Zone very happily.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The product placement has begun

https://people.com/royals/meghan-markles-whale-tail-necklace-from-her-first-charity-visit-in-canada-has-symbolic-meaning/amp/?xid=amprecirc1

Same deal as she had with Jennifer Meyer but does not have to do it under the table anymore.

I’m so glad you brought this up. In the group picture (posted up thread) is is wearing a gold necklace with a round pendant. In lipids from the same event and released the next day she the whale on. What’s the deal?

Did you read the article? It’s written right in the article the difference. When she wore the round necklace it was in the morning. When she arrived at the second meeting, the artist gifted Meghan the necklace and thanked her for bringing awareness to the indigenous tribe. BTW, the article also states that at both events, it was the staff who took those pictures and twitted the visit out. No paparazzi to be found for all the fonts claiming Meghan called the paparazzi to follow her around.

I can’t believe she’s being demonized for supporting indigenous artists while doing classic royal “work” on environmental issues. Seriously I feel like I’m in the twilight zone.

I seriously wonder if Samantha Markle is here. I'm sure she scours the internet for threads about her sister and posts on them. Why wouldn't a crazy like that do so?


Crazy MM haters see what they want to see. The live in the Twilight Zone very happily.

I seriously wonder if Samantha Markle is here. I'm sure she scours the internet for threads about her sister and posts on them. Why wouldn't a crazy like that do so?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The product placement has begun

https://people.com/royals/meghan-markles-whale-tail-necklace-from-her-first-charity-visit-in-canada-has-symbolic-meaning/amp/?xid=amprecirc1

Same deal as she had with Jennifer Meyer but does not have to do it under the table anymore.

I’m so glad you brought this up. In the group picture (posted up thread) is is wearing a gold necklace with a round pendant. In lipids from the same event and released the next day she the whale on. What’s the deal?

Did you read the article? It’s written right in the article the difference. When she wore the round necklace it was in the morning. When she arrived at the second meeting, the artist gifted Meghan the necklace and thanked her for bringing awareness to the indigenous tribe. BTW, the article also states that at both events, it was the staff who took those pictures and twitted the visit out. No paparazzi to be found for all the fonts claiming Meghan called the paparazzi to follow her around.

I can’t believe she’s being demonized for supporting indigenous artists while doing classic royal “work” on environmental issues. Seriously I feel like I’m in the twilight zone.

I seriously wonder if Samantha Markle is here. I'm sure she scours the internet for threads about her sister and posts on them. Why wouldn't a crazy like that do so?


Crazy MM haters see what they want to see. The live in the Twilight Zone very happily.

I seriously wonder if Samantha Markle is here. I'm sure she scours the internet for threads about her sister and posts on them. Why wouldn't a crazy like that do so?

I think its just a lot of unhappy women whose husband wouldn't lift a finger to do 1/10th of what Harry has done for Meghan or vice versa.

Sour grapes.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The product placement has begun

https://people.com/royals/meghan-markles-whale-tail-necklace-from-her-first-charity-visit-in-canada-has-symbolic-meaning/amp/?xid=amprecirc1

Same deal as she had with Jennifer Meyer but does not have to do it under the table anymore.

I’m so glad you brought this up. In the group picture (posted up thread) is is wearing a gold necklace with a round pendant. In lipids from the same event and released the next day she the whale on. What’s the deal?

Did you read the article? It’s written right in the article the difference. When she wore the round necklace it was in the morning. When she arrived at the second meeting, the artist gifted Meghan the necklace and thanked her for bringing awareness to the indigenous tribe. BTW, the article also states that at both events, it was the staff who took those pictures and twitted the visit out. No paparazzi to be found for all the fonts claiming Meghan called the paparazzi to follow her around.

She met with “Justice for Girls”, nothing to do with tribal awareness, and no they did not gift her a $1600 necklace. But the gallery owners advertised it all over Instagram and People devoted a whole article to it. Either you are daft or you don’t understand how product placement works.

[Anonymous]

I'm just a regular woman. How is this whale tail necklace different than the Jennifer Meyer issue? Or is this also problematic?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The product placement has begun

https://people.com/royals/meghan-markles-whale-tail-necklace-from-her-first-charity-visit-in-canada-has-symbolic-meaning/amp/?xid=amprecirc1

Same deal as she had with Jennifer Meyer but does not have to do it under the table anymore.

I’m so glad you brought this up. In the group picture (posted up thread) is is wearing a gold necklace with a round pendant. In lipids from the same event and released the next day she the whale on. What’s the deal?

Did you read the article? It’s written right in the article the difference. When she wore the round necklace it was in the morning. When she arrived at the second meeting, the artist gifted Meghan the necklace and thanked her for bringing awareness to the indigenous tribe. BTW, the article also states that at both events, it was the staff who took those pictures and twitted the visit out. No paparazzi to be found for all the fonts claiming Meghan called the paparazzi to follow her around.

The evil step sisters do not care about the facts. They only want proof that the prince made the wrong choice when he didn't marry them instead of MM. Sad, wrung-out bitches.

Facts don't play a part in this. Make believe is much more fun.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The product placement has begun

https://people.com/royals/meghan-markles-whale-tail-necklace-from-her-first-charity-visit-in-canada-has-symbolic-meaning/amp/?xid=amprecirc1

Same deal as she had with Jennifer Meyer but does not have to do it under the table anymore.

I’m so glad you brought this up. In the group picture (posted up thread) is is wearing a gold necklace with a round pendant. In lipids from the same event and released the next day she the whale on. What’s the deal?

Did you read the article? It’s written right in the article the difference. When she wore the round necklace it was in the morning. When she arrived at the second meeting, the artist gifted Meghan the necklace and thanked her for bringing awareness to the indigenous tribe. BTW, the article also states that at both events, it was the staff who took those pictures and twitted the visit out. No paparazzi to be found for all the fonts claiming Meghan called the paparazzi to follow her around.

She met with “Justice for Girls”, nothing to do with tribal awareness, and no they did not gift her a $1600 necklace. But the gallery owners advertised it all over Instagram and People devoted a whole article to it. Either you are daft or you don’t understand how product placement works.

So you didn’t read the article? I mean go read the first few sentences. Then eat your crow.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Has this been posted here yet? An interesting analysis of the constant bickering evident in this thread.

https://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2020/01/meghan-markle-kate-middleton-royals-culture-war/604981/

That's a great article.

+1 This explains why I want to defend both Kate and Meghan.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:William's mother was a Kindergarten teacher....

Cute!

dp I know it says that she was a Kindergarten teacher but, my British friends ( who are teachers) effectively said she was a nanny. At 19, I highly doubt she was a teacher. Being a nanny is fine but, my friends went to Uni to be teachers and Diana did not.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Has this been posted here yet? An interesting analysis of the constant bickering evident in this thread.

https://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2020/01/meghan-markle-kate-middleton-royals-culture-war/604981/

That's a great article.

+1 This explains why I want to defend both Kate and Meghan.

Excellent read.