Meghan and Prince Harry are moving to the U.S./Canada - OFFICIAL

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The product placement has begun

https://people.com/royals/meghan-markles-whale-tail-necklace-from-her-first-charity-visit-in-canada-has-symbolic-meaning/amp/?xid=amprecirc1

Same deal as she had with Jennifer Meyer but does not have to do it under the table anymore.


I’m so glad you brought this up. In the group picture (posted up thread) is is wearing a gold necklace with a round pendant. In lipids from the same event and released the next day she the whale on. What’s the deal?


Did you read the article? It’s written right in the article the difference. When she wore the round necklace it was in the morning. When she arrived at the second meeting, the artist gifted Meghan the necklace and thanked her for bringing awareness to the indigenous tribe. BTW, the article also states that at both events, it was the staff who took those pictures and twitted the visit out. No paparazzi to be found for all the fonts claiming Meghan called the paparazzi to follow her around.


She met with “Justice for Girls”, nothing to do with tribal awareness, and no they did not gift her a $1600 necklace. But the gallery owners advertised it all over Instagram and People devoted a whole article to it. Either you are daft or you don’t understand how product placement works.


So you didn’t read the article? I mean go read the first few sentences. Then eat your crow.


Got it, you are just daft. FYI she is suing the other jewelry designer who “gifted” her several items in exchange for press.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:William's mother was a Kindergarten teacher....


Cute!


dp I know it says that she was a Kindergarten teacher but, my British friends ( who are teachers) effectively said she was a nanny. At 19, I highly doubt she was a teacher. Being a nanny is fine but, my friends went to Uni to be teachers and Diana did not.


I think Diana was properly a kindergarten aide.

She was of a class of women who were expected to marry well and the last of a generation for whom university education was not expected for upper class women. And she apparently wasn't very bright, academically. The kindergarten job was one of those nice little jobs you did before marrying a nice man and settling down into a nice country life.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Has this been posted here yet? An interesting analysis of the constant bickering evident in this thread.

https://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2020/01/meghan-markle-kate-middleton-royals-culture-war/604981/


That's a great article.


+1 This explains why I want to defend both Kate and Meghan.


Excellent read.


+3, great article. I don't feel one way or another about Kate since I've never followed her or the British royal family, although recently have been interested in Harry and Meghan and I feel bad about the racism and cattiness Meghan has faced. In general, I think most people don't consider themselves on a "team" and just support other women (some on this thread are an obvious exception). A lot of projection from women here who analyze their every move, appearance, clothing, etc. and then draw unsupported conclusions about their character (also, Kate vs. Meghan as "traditionalism" vs. "modernity"). I wish we as women spent our time in more productive ways, vs. picking apart celebrities.

Closing paragraph:

"But all women lose when women’s lives are boiled down to these simple binaries: selfless mother against ruthless careerist. Meghan is a mother too. Kate has political interests, such as mental health and early-childhood education. Both have nannies and live in homes worth millions. Not everything they do is “sending a signal” or “making a statement”; some of their personal choices are just that: personal choices. By focusing only on the differences between them, we lose sight of the institutions—the royal family and the architecture of misogyny—that constrain them both."
Anonymous
Oh no! Meghan's mom is selling her out to the tabloids too!

https://people.com/royals/doria-ragland-says-daughter-meghan-markle-will-always-be-okay-says-source/

Tsk tsk.
Anonymous
Maybe the Brits are waking up. Too little, too late. It would take a massive change in their entire racial system to undo this.

"The analysis - which appears to support Duchess Meghan's argument that she has faced highly critical treatment in the British press - found that of the 843 articles in 14 print newspapers since mid-May 2018, 43% were negative. Just one in five (20%) were positive..."



https://www.theguardian.com/global/2020/jan/18/meghan-gets-more-than-twice-as-many-negative-headlines-as-positive

Meanwhile the ratio for Kate is 4/5 positive while doing zero to accomplish it. Kate could be grocery shopping with a bodyguard and the paper will rave 'Future Queen just like commoners!"
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Oh no! Meghan's mom is selling her out to the tabloids too!

https://people.com/royals/doria-ragland-says-daughter-meghan-markle-will-always-be-okay-says-source/

Tsk tsk.


It sounds like her mom is defending her daughter to the press. Her mother said her grandson is “the cutest” and Meghan is a strong woman. It sounds like her mom didn’t like her dad selling her out and stepped up to defend her daughter. Good for them!

There is nothing in the article except words of support from Doria Ragland.

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Oh no! Meghan's mom is selling her out to the tabloids too!

https://people.com/royals/doria-ragland-says-daughter-meghan-markle-will-always-be-okay-says-source/

Tsk tsk.


It sounds like her mom is defending her daughter to the press. Her mother said her grandson is “the cutest” and Meghan is a strong woman. It sounds like her mom didn’t like her dad selling her out and stepped up to defend her daughter. Good for them!

There is nothing in the article except words of support from Doria Ragland.



I agree. Her mom is being supportive.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Maybe the Brits are waking up. Too little, too late. It would take a massive change in their entire racial system to undo this.

"The analysis - which appears to support Duchess Meghan's argument that she has faced highly critical treatment in the British press - found that of the 843 articles in 14 print newspapers since mid-May 2018, 43% were negative. Just one in five (20%) were positive..."



https://www.theguardian.com/global/2020/jan/18/meghan-gets-more-than-twice-as-many-negative-headlines-as-positive

Meanwhile the ratio for Kate is 4/5 positive while doing zero to accomplish it. Kate could be grocery shopping with a bodyguard and the paper will rave 'Future Queen just like commoners!"


OK: "The Duchess of Sussex gets more than twice as many negative headlines as positive ones, according to Guardian analysis of articles published between May 2018 and mid January 2019."

Why such a specific data range? Let's go back to when we first started hearing about Kate as a romantic partner. It was not all positive. And if 43% is negative, then 57% is positive. What is the ideal ratio?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Maybe the Brits are waking up. Too little, too late. It would take a massive change in their entire racial system to undo this.

"The analysis - which appears to support Duchess Meghan's argument that she has faced highly critical treatment in the British press - found that of the 843 articles in 14 print newspapers since mid-May 2018, 43% were negative. Just one in five (20%) were positive..."



https://www.theguardian.com/global/2020/jan/18/meghan-gets-more-than-twice-as-many-negative-headlines-as-positive

Meanwhile the ratio for Kate is 4/5 positive while doing zero to accomplish it. Kate could be grocery shopping with a bodyguard and the paper will rave 'Future Queen just like commoners!"


You should read the Atlantic article. But I think you're afraid to.

Shrugs. Meghan was fresh meat. Just like Kate had been before. But Kate toughened it out. Meghan would have too had she the stamina. I also think that the way Meghan handled it made it worse. Especially the discrepancy between her "woke" progressiveness and demanding extreme privilege at the same time caused a lot of people to start seeing her as hypocritical, and that resulted in sharpening criticism. I do think she really didn't understand how it would come across in the British presses.

She likely didn't realize what she was getting into and what she needed to do to manage it or balance it.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Maybe the Brits are waking up. Too little, too late. It would take a massive change in their entire racial system to undo this.

"The analysis - which appears to support Duchess Meghan's argument that she has faced highly critical treatment in the British press - found that of the 843 articles in 14 print newspapers since mid-May 2018, 43% were negative. Just one in five (20%) were positive..."



https://www.theguardian.com/global/2020/jan/18/meghan-gets-more-than-twice-as-many-negative-headlines-as-positive

Meanwhile the ratio for Kate is 4/5 positive while doing zero to accomplish it. Kate could be grocery shopping with a bodyguard and the paper will rave 'Future Queen just like commoners!"


I really thought Meghan would be able to ignore the gossip papers. I’ve seen many celebrities interviewed who are shocked by the things being said because they pay no attention.
Anonymous
My take is that Meghan is far from a gold digger. She left the royal life and is capable of making her own money regardless of A list/ C list. It’s a living. She practically rescued Harry from a stuffy dysfunctional family with zero warmth. I mean, they are covering for a pedophile. I can’t imagine Harry is ok with that. I like Kate too and don’t get the ‘teams’ thing. I think Harry has likely always wanted out of that life and his new family gave him the courage to break free. Good for him. There was always talk about his mom trying to expose the boys to normal life. I see this as part of her legacy for him.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Oh no! Meghan's mom is selling her out to the tabloids too!

https://people.com/royals/doria-ragland-says-daughter-meghan-markle-will-always-be-okay-says-source/

Tsk tsk.


It sounds like her mom is defending her daughter to the press. Her mother said her grandson is “the cutest” and Meghan is a strong woman. It sounds like her mom didn’t like her dad selling her out and stepped up to defend her daughter. Good for them!

There is nothing in the article except words of support from Doria Ragland.



Her mother talked to someone who spoke to the press. It's hard to avoid but never comes across positively. Earlier, her mother is quoted as supporting their decision to exit, which is supportive but also critical of the Royal Family, which is the only reason any of us even know who Meghan is.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:My take is that Meghan is far from a gold digger. She left the royal life and is capable of making her own money regardless of A list/ C list. It’s a living. She practically rescued Harry from a stuffy dysfunctional family with zero warmth. I mean, they are covering for a pedophile. I can’t imagine Harry is ok with that. I like Kate too and don’t get the ‘teams’ thing. I think Harry has likely always wanted out of that life and his new family gave him the courage to break free. Good for him. There was always talk about his mom trying to expose the boys to normal life. I see this as part of her legacy for him.


Now he has moved on to the normal life of an influencer.

Ugh.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Oh no! Meghan's mom is selling her out to the tabloids too!

https://people.com/royals/doria-ragland-says-daughter-meghan-markle-will-always-be-okay-says-source/

Tsk tsk.


It sounds like her mom is defending her daughter to the press. Her mother said her grandson is “the cutest” and Meghan is a strong woman. It sounds like her mom didn’t like her dad selling her out and stepped up to defend her daughter. Good for them!

There is nothing in the article except words of support from Doria Ragland.



Her mother talked to someone who spoke to the press. It's hard to avoid but never comes across positively. Earlier, her mother is quoted as supporting their decision to exit, which is supportive but also critical of the Royal Family, which is the only reason any of us even know who Meghan is.


That "tsk tsk" poster is just a super-bitch who interprets absolutely anything to do with Meghan Markle as negative, even her mother saying, through someone else, that she was a strong woman and her baby was the cutest. The PP is mental.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Oh no! Meghan's mom is selling her out to the tabloids too!

https://people.com/royals/doria-ragland-says-daughter-meghan-markle-will-always-be-okay-says-source/

Tsk tsk.


It sounds like her mom is defending her daughter to the press. Her mother said her grandson is “the cutest” and Meghan is a strong woman. It sounds like her mom didn’t like her dad selling her out and stepped up to defend her daughter. Good for them!

There is nothing in the article except words of support from Doria Ragland.



Her mother talked to someone who spoke to the press. It's hard to avoid but never comes across positively. Earlier, her mother is quoted as supporting their decision to exit, which is supportive but also critical of the Royal Family, which is the only reason any of us even know who Meghan is.


That "tsk tsk" poster is just a super-bitch who interprets absolutely anything to do with Meghan Markle as negative, even her mother saying, through someone else, that she was a strong woman and her baby was the cutest. The PP is mental.


This.

I love that article. Doria praised her daughter while speaking in passing to someone else who just shared it with the press. Far different from Thomas Markle calling up TMZ and GMB to be a hateful SOB.

I also love Meghan's new life in Canada. It's clear she was isolated in Britain (emotionally and physically) and its SO much easier for people to get up to Canada - especially from LA - than on a 11-hour direct flight to London.

You wanted to know where her friends are? They're by her side.

Meghan has also been surrounded by the support of close friends who have come to visit her in Canada. She was seen picking up her friend Heather Dorak, a pilates instructor in L.A., on Thursday at the Victoria International Airport. Meghan’s former Suits co-star Abigail Spencer went on a New Year’s Day hike with Meghan and Harry. And actress Janina Gavankar snapped the adorable photo of Archie that appeared on the Duke and Duchess’ holiday card. Meghan’s good friend Jessica Mulroney, who lives in Toronto, was also on-hand to watch Archie while Meghan and Harry traveled to the U.K. to make their big announcement.
Forum Index » Entertainment and Pop Culture
Go to: